Construmentalism
November 10
, 2009
Win Galbraith, Ph.D., PhD in Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, and Theology, University of Pittsburgh; M.A. Theology, Western Seminary in Holland, Mich.; B.S. philosophy and physics, MIT. Formerly interim department chair, University of Pittsburgh, regional campus, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, and Religious Studies.
David Hume pointed out that if the various sciences are drawing universal conclusions from particular premises they are using invalid logic. Kant asked “How is science possible?” Perhaps we should modify that question to “What is it that science is doing?” Since past theories have all proved false, should we conclude that the current crop of theories will also prove false? Or are we making progress? What implications, if any, can we draw from Thomas Kuhn’s work? Here are the answers.
Information from the official website
Related Organizations
Places to eat:
Drink Specials:
- Chili's Grill & Bar: 11 am - 11 pm: $2.25 (16 oz) & $3.25 (23 oz) domestic drafts, $3.99 margaritas, $2.50 wells, $3 house wine
- »Video: Texas Instruments, based in Dallas, displays DLP Pico technology
- »Dallas women make it work with one Little Black Dress
- »A male Yorkie mix is missing in North Dallas
- »Pinkberry debuts Dallas store on Thursday night
- »Grill on the Alley at Galleria Dallas introduces gluten-free menu for lunch and dinner
-
»Kids and family events in Dallas-Fort Worth, November 26-December 2
-
»Movie review: Red Cliff (Chi bi)
-
»Theater review: Port Twilight or The History of Science (A Chronicle of Folly, Wisdom and Madness)
-
»Newt's Nook opens at Animal Guardians sanctuary in Celina
-
»Photo gallery: Living in Gratitude at South Side on Lamar (November 24)
