Friday, February 2, 2007
Perry signs order requiring anti-cancer vaccine for girls
Using his executive privilege, Gov. Rick Perry signed an order on Friday requiring that female students be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer.
By making it an executive order, Perry sidesteps opposition from conservatives and parents' rights groups. The order makes Texas the first state to require the vaccine, called Gardasil and recently licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for use in girls and women 9 to 26 years old.
Merck, the manufacturer, is funding efforts to pass similar laws across the country, for use on girls as young as 11 or 12.
According to Channel 11, Merck doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through an organization called Women in Government, to which Perry has a number of personal ties. Merck also contributed $6,000 to his re-election campaign.
Girls can refuse the vaccine if their parents file an objection on religious or other philosophical grounds.
Posted by T.G.
Email
|
Print
|
5 Comments
|
Contribute
|
-
»The Grape in Dallas deemed best burger in Texas in yet-another best burger list
-
»Deceased exoneree's family hopes Governor Perry will issue posthumous pardon
-
»Rick Perry owes Bobby Jindal prime rib after Texas loses college world series
-
»Dallas is fifth on recession-proof city list, says Brookings Institution study
-
»Deadline for "Don't Mess with Texas" TV commercial submissions is June 28
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|

twisteddog, says:
Too bad there's no vaccine for idiocy.
Anonymous
2 years, 10 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Mike Orren, says:
This one certainly snuck up on me -- And I thought the commercials were creeping me out.
<object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hJ8x3KR75fA"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hJ8x3KR75fA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" wmode="transparent"></object>
Good overview of the arguments on both sides here: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/f...
Here's a con-piece: http://www.whosplayin.com/xoops/html/...
Don't know why it's the governor's job to play nanny on this one?
Maybe this is why: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedit...
*But the move drew criticism from conservative groups, which noted that the governor had accepted campaign contributions from the vaccine's manufacturer, Merck & Co.*
*"All Merck wanted was a mandate so the insurance companies would have to pay for this. Follow the money," said Cathie Adams, president of the Texas Eagle Forum, an organization that promotes socially conservative government policies.*
More on Perry as a sweetheart of the pharmaceutical industry: http://www.publicintegrity.org/rx/rep...
Oh, and Merck's head lobbyist in Texas? Perry's former chief of staff: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-n...
At 3 doses per girl, ranging from $120-$200 per dose, and 365,000 girls per year, Merck just racked up a $131 million annuity minimum.
But there's a lot more than that at stake for Merck. Insurance companies currently don't cover Gardasil. A state, particularly a big state like Texas, mandating the vaccines means that insurance companies are likely to add it to their roster of covered treatments -- increasing adoption in the 49 civilized states where it is not mandatory.
Enforcement on this (not at Merck's expense, I'm sure) will be a nightmare.
No doubt HPV and cervical cancer are serious problems. But there are a lot of unanswered questions still about the effectiveness of Gardasil. And the money trail here doesn't leave me feeling at all certain that Perry has the well being of Texas women first and foremost in his mind.
Staff
2 years, 10 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Mike Orren, says:
As expected, lots of people are crying foul, led by Lewisville Republican Jane Nelson:
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/conten...
Staff
2 years, 10 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
jenn, says:
Why do conservatives cheapen their legitimate gripes with this legislation (specifically cost and the questionable relationship between Perry and Merck) by bringing up the "moral/religious" debate? I don't want to listen to anything they have to say when they even obliquely intimate that somehow this vaccine is going to turn a bunch of 12-year-olds into sex fiends.
Anonymous
2 years, 10 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Mike Orren, says:
<embed align="middle" allownetworking="external" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#006699" flashvars="config=http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/xml/data_synd.jhtml?vid=82235%26myspace=false" height="325" name="comedy_player" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" src="http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/syndicated_player/index.jhtml" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="340">
Staff
2 years, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal