Friday, July 6, 2007
Lancaster’s Cedar Valley College approves “Climate Commitment” greenhouse gas reductions
Lancaster TODAY
Lancaster TODAY is the premier source of community news for the Lancaster area
Cedar Valley College President Jennifer Wimbish has signed the American College & University Presidents Climate Commitment (ACUPCC), joining more than 250 other colleges and universities in formally committing to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and education and research on climate change.
The ACUPCC was formally adopted recently at a summit of higher education leaders in Washington, D.C. Cedar Valley College signed the Commitment on May 27, making it one of the first community colleges in Texas to become a part of this exciting initiative.
“Global warming is a defining challenge of our time,” Wimbish said. “Human activities contribute to the problem, and working together humans have the capacity to solve the problem. That means taking serious action today to stop adding global warming pollution to the atmosphere. Cedar Valley College is committed to leading the way.”
As part of Cedar Valley College’s commitment, Wimbish will create a comprehensive institutional action plan to move towards climate neutrality. In addition, the college will immediately take or continue to take the following actions:
- Adopt green standards and components for new buildings built on campus;
- Continue the paper recycling program on campus and expand the program to include other items;
- Recycle groundwater for irrigation of the campus;
- Encourage a greater use of ENERGY STAR certified products;
- Encourage use of public transportation;
- Continue the implementation of a flexible work schedule during the summer.
These efforts build on Cedar Valley’s ongoing commitment to sustainability, which include expanding its Energy Efficient Green Building Institute (EEGBI).
The EEGBI was created in 2005 by the encouragement of the U.S. Department of Energy Building America program, Residential Energy Services Network and the U.S. Green Building Council.
The inception of the EEGBI made Cedar Valley College one of the first higher education institutions in the nation to offer programming to meet the emerging need for workforce training in the area of green building and energy efficiency.
Guided by a panel of experts who serve on the advisory committee, the EEGBI offers a variety of educational programs and resources focused on energy efficiency, healthy buildings and sustainable communities.
Thanks to the leadership of Rep. Helen Giddings and Sen. Royce West during this past legislative session, $50,000 was authorized to support the work of the EEGBI.
The EEGBI’s efforts are consistent with ongoing work to reduce global warming, and include developing training programs and education, awareness activities and resources that will promote the national and state agenda for the conservation of energy use in buildings, the use of environmentally responsible building technologies leading to improved air quality, and the development of sustainable communities.
The Presidents’ Climate Commitment is the first such effort by any major sector of society to set climate neutrality — not just a reduction — as its target. This undertaking by America’s colleges and universities is inspired by efforts like the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, the U.S. Climate Action Partnership and other collective efforts by states and businesses.
“Colleges and universities must lead the effort to reverse global warming for the health and well-being of current and future generations,” Michael Crow, president of Arizona State University and chair of the ACUPCC Steering Committee, said. “On behalf of all the signatories, I welcome President Wimbish to the commitment; we are honored and pleased to have her join us.”
The ACUPCC is a high-visibility effort to address global warming by garnering institutional commitments to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions and to accelerate the research and educational efforts of higher education to equip society to re-stabilize the earth’s climate.
Under the guidance and direction of university presidents, the Commitment is being supported and implemented by the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education, Second Nature and ecoAmerica. For more information, visit presidentsclimatecommitment.org.
Email
|
Print
|
1 Comment
|
Contribute
|
-
»Dallas County Community College District sets record fall enrollment
-
»Cedar Valley College’s Family Music Theatre reveals 2009 spring musical
-
»Six Dallas-area colleges and universities open theater productions this week
-
»Nine Dallas County Community College students named LeCroy Scholars
-
»Cedar Valley College awarded $400,000 from U.S. Dept. of Education
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|
- »Favoriting contest: South Pacific at the Winspear
- »In defense of the Dallas Morning News' new GM plan
- »Free your mind, and the rest will follow
- »Commenting contest: Home for the Holidays Musical at Palace Theatre Arts Center in Grapevine
- »Special event: Join Teresa for a special Chef's Tasting at Masaryk


interestedcitizen, says:
Using energy efficiently is a good idea, but often, government policies actually reward people for wasting energy.
Consider public buses. On the surface, they seem efficient. One motor, one vehicle, and enough room for perhaps 40 people. Think more deeply. The bus weighs more. The motor is more powerful. We really need to know the weight of the vehicle per seat. Then we need to know the number of units of fuel burned per person per mile.
Now, consider the fact that the bus is rarely full. In fact before it picks up its first passenger and after it picks up its last passenger, it runs completely empty, making it far less efficient than a private passenger vehicle with just one occupant.
Consider the fact that the bus doesn't run directly between a point of origin and an intended destination. A private passenger vehicle is more efficient in that respect because it doesn't have to travel far out of the way in order to generate sufficient passengers to make it worthwhile.
Now consider the actual cost of providing public transit. Private transit pays for itself. The huge public subsidies of public transit are at least an indicator that energy resources are not being used efficiently. That is, it is quite possible that public transit actually wastes more energy than private transit.
Use the term "David Lawyer" in a web search. You will find an article that makes a very good case that public transit uses energy less efficiently than private passenger vehicles. It isn't politically correct to say so, but the science does appear to support the conclusion that political correctness is leading us down a blind alley.
The "Live Earth" extravaganza is an example. How much electricity did they waste amplifying the sound? How much energy did people waste traveling to and from that unnecessary production? I don't think it is as much about saving energy as much as it is about taking control of people's lives. I think it is really about world domination. A few people, of whom Al Gore is one, want a world body to control all of us. We're fools to buy into it.
Anonymous
2 years, 4 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal