Jump to: site navigation, content.

Local stuff that matters to you.
Did you know about Hard Night's Dayplaying at Barley House tomorrow?
News & events for
Thursday, December
3

Friday, May 11, 2007

Farmers Branch Mayor Bob Phelps talks

Bob Phelps

Bob Phelps

— Talk about pressure, and you’re talking about 69-year-old Farmers Branch Mayor Bob Phelps.

“The big issue is immigration,” Phelps said. “The May 12 election is based on that. Other than that, our city has done well, with lots of good years to show for it. I feel that Ordinance 2903 is bad for the city, because it’s costing the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“The immigration deal has really soured the situation. Hopefully, things will settle down after the election, and we can get back to taking care of our city and the needs of our citizens.”

Phelps said that when he was growing up he was a shy child and never served in a leadership role.

“I got talked into running for city council in 1986,” he said. “I just decided it would be good to serve our community.”

In 2008, Phelps will be up for reelection. Farmers Branch officials serve three-year terms and there are no term limits. This is his fourth term and at the end of the term he will have served 12 years as mayor and nine years as a councilman. He was appointed as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustments in 1984 and served two years.

Farmers Branch City Council Meeting

  • Mon
  • May
  • 21st
  • 6PM

During Phelp’s tenure, several outstanding programs have been implemented in Farmers Branch, one being the Dividend Program.

“Back when times were good and we had extra money, we decided to lower the tax rate and were able to pay a dividend to all our taxpayers for two years,” Phelps said. “We won recognition from the Kennedy School of Government for innovation in government.”

Another significant program was the pay-as-you-go plan.

“In the early 1990s we decided to start a “pay-as-you-go plan,” wherein we set aside money for landfill machinery and a fire engine in lieu of selling bonds to pay for it,” said Phelps.

“After we accomplished that, we started setting aside money for city buildings. A new fire station, as well as an administration building on the west side of city hall, is currently under construction. In August, we will be substantially debt free, not having sold bonds since 1986.”

Some other accomplishments are the construction of the Farmers Branch Justice Center, Senior Center, Recreation Center and establishing the Renaissance area.

“I like being mayor because over the years I’ve been able to serve our citizens and work for our community,” said Phelps.

“Since we don’t get paid, you have to enjoy it. I’m the longest serving councilman and mayor in the history of Farmers Branch.”

Care about your neighborhood?

Here at Pegasus News, we think there's nothing more important than what happens right on your street. (Yeah, we're talking to you.) If you want to make sure your neighbors know what's happening, whether it's a garage sale, a community meeting, a car burglary, a cleanup or a home sold -- we'll help you get that information out there.

You can submit stories, photos or video from your neighborhood here.

Or, drop us a line and we'll help you decide how best to spread the word.

Phelps was born in Oklahoma; married his high school sweetheart, Dee, in 1955 and at age 19 they bought their first home in Farmers Branch in 1957.

He started to work for State Farm, having his own agency, in 1963 and retired Dec. 31, 2006, after winning many trips and awards over a 43.5 year period.

For hobbies, the mayor likes to travel, fish and hunt. Aside from his wife, Dee, his family consists of a son, Rob, a daughter, Kim, three grandchildren, and two great grandsons.

“Bob Phelps is the most honorable, hardworking mayor I know,” said Councilman Charlie Bird. “He exemplifies high integrity in his personal, business and political life. His contribution to the City of Farmers Branch is unequalled by any other person in the city.

“He is an outstanding resident of Farmers Branch, Texas and the United States, as well as being a sincere, conscientious mayor. He always tries to do what is right and best for the City of Farmers Branch.”



  • Staff
  • Verified User
  • Anonymous

EdWeirdness, says:

The very first thing that FB voters do following Saturdays election, is to initiate a recall of this moron!

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Mike Orren, says:

Thanks for joining the conversation, Ed. But can you give us the detail driving your description of the Mayor?

Staff

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Sanders Kaufman, says:

I didn't realize that Phelps was the motivating force behind Farmer's Branch's truly conservative government.

While other city mayors have been asking for loans and handouts to build their infrastructure, he's been saving up for it - and then only actually buying it after the city had the money on hand.

It's just too bad that his city is now over-run by anti-immigrant, White Separatists.

Verified

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

sar1776, says:

I'm getting about darn tired of you biggots out there calling those of us who actually live in Farmers Branch, and who want our Federal laws enforced, racists. I expect our Federal government to uphold our laws and when they don't, I expect our State and Local governments to do it for them.

I am married to someone from Mexico, so don't go calling those of us supporting the anti-illegal alien bill as "white separatists." That does nothing more than show your ignorance.

Signed, a Farmers Branch resident

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

powen37, says:

I just had a discussion about illegal immigrants in the U.S. the other day. I get labeled as a racist because I want the laws upheld, but when I ask fellow employees if the tables were turned and we went south to look for work then its not ok. Why is that? I mean it would be the same and the answer is well you were not born there so why should you have the same rights. No kidding so why the double standard? Thanks, Confused in Carrollton

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Sanders Kaufman, says:

Farmers Branch's minority of anti-immigrants are being insincere when they say that all they want is the federal rules to be enforced.

Indeed - the border bigots are proposing a whole mess of rules - including prohibition against using Spanish words in certain situations.

This isn't an attempt to enforce federal law. It's just another way for bigots to express their lack of regard for our Guest Workers.

Fortunately, here in the US, we've been learning how to deal with this kind of White Supremacist attitude for many, many generations.

So while this kind of insincerity may work on their fellow bigots - it's not likely to fool the great majority of Americans who tolerate, and even employ, our Guest Workers.

Verified

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

powen37, says:

AP) Voters in Farmers Branch decided today whether to repeal or approve an ordinance prohibiting landlords from renting apartments to most illegal immigrants.

The ban was being approved by a 3-to-1 margin after early votes were counted.

Voters in the Dallas suburb are the first in the nation to vote on a regulation requiring apartment managers to verify that renters are U.S. citizens or legal immigrants before leasing to them.

If voters approve the ban, opponents plan to seek a restraining order to stop the city from enforcing it and try to get the case to trial.

Council members first approved the ban in November, saying the federal government has failed to address illegal immigration.

Sounds like the minority won and the "guest workers" didn't.

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Crispin Reedy, says:

Racism, hm, that's actually a bit too kind of a word for this ordinance. Let's call it what it really is: FASCIST.

Proof of citizenship to rent an apartment? That's WAY too close to "Papers please!" for me. What's next? You have to show proof of citizenship to buy food at the grocery store? How about official Farmers Branch roadblocks on each road into the city where people have to show their passport and state their business for entering the city?

CITIZENS! We must submit to the control of the state for the better good of all!

And I would bet you a nickel that tonight, citizens in Farmers Branch will go out to eat in restaurants that employ illegal immigrants in their kitchens (and pay them terribly) and they will go to sleep in houses which were built by illegal immigrants (for low wages). It's the dirty little secret of this area in general-- cost of living is low because LOTS of businesses employ illegal immigrants. Oh, but FB doesn't seem to MIND that ... just so long as they sleep somewhere else. Outside the city limits.

Fascist Farmers Branch. It even has that nice alliteration thing going.

Verified

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

jefmelch, says:

It seems to me the people most protected by enforcing immigration laws are themselves immigrants.

There are a limited number of apartments, or jobs, or seats in schools, for anybody, citizens or immigrants. Call these social "slots". It's like musical chairs. A lot of slots, but more people cirling around looking for a slot than there are slots. The legal immigrants face quotas, fair or unfair, that limit the number of such people who can even join the circle. So a limited number of Nigerians or Somalis or Thais or Burmese or Hatians are in contention for apartments in Farmers Branch.

The illegals face a legal quota as well. But they have ignored it. So people who bypass the US consulate in their homeland, bypass checkpoints at airport of departure, bypass entry points in the United States, all show up in the queue loooking for jobs, and apartments, in Farmers Branch.

Failure to enforce the immigration laws grants special advantage to non-citizens from nations proximate and continguous to the United States over those from nations distant and separated by geography.

You can argue that immigrants of European bloodstock and speaking Latinate language SHOULD be preferenced over those of non-European stock and other language groups. But if you do, don't try to call ME the racist.

Don't pull the "diversity" argument on me either. A diverse community would include the Haitians and Thais of other skin tone. But these legal immigrants are now shut out by the illegals comprising the second largest racial demographic group in this country.

A "majority privilege" line of attach won't work either. The US no longer has a racial majority. All races comprise a minority, and the question is only how much of a plurality any one group can muster. The best way to avoid any one group oppressing the rest is to ensure all immigrants of all races -- playing by the rules -- add to the population in fair numbers.

Now, the question of whether a small suburb should or can enforce a law that the federal government cannot is a fair one. But let's broaden that question too. Should a local police force or a county sherriff be responsible to enforce federal narcotics laws? Should the city enforce the federal Fair Housing Act on apartment owners? Does a city have any duty to enforce American with Disability Act rules by echoing federal law in the local building code? Does the police force in Waco have any jurisdiction over the Branch Davidian's violations of the regulations of the ATF?

I suggest that the town is in a BETTER posture to enforce such laws in a fair and humane manner than out-of-town federal marshalls. But you may disagree...

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Crispin Reedy, says:

May I point out how completely idiotic it is to assume that there is a rental housing shortage in Farmers Branch? Please show me your sources that prove that there is one.

Verified

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

vincent442, says:

Racist?! Nobodys talking race here..merely enforcing the rule of law. Are you not aware that legal immigration already is at a 50+ year high and that our cities are becoming increasingly Dicksenian slums? Add to this the spectre of uncontrolled illegal immigration and you get an increasingly ugly picture of environmental degradation and a depleted social service system. Clearly immigration is a necessary and vital component to the future economic,cultural and social welfare of this Nation. Moreover the diversity inherent in a rich immigrant mix ensure that America in the future will remain a beacon of hope to the world and a powerful magnet to the best and brightest of those abroad to take up stakes and try their luck here.However like a utility pipeline it is a flow that must be managed with care lest there be floods or droughts. Thus it is incumbent upon us as a Nation to strictly enforce a fair worldwide quota system to properly manage influx levels.

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Sanders Kaufman, says:

What the anti-immigrant mob needs to understand about this country is that we are looking for ways to get them INTO our society, not to exclude them from it.

Beyond that, it's dishonest to say that this is "merely enforcing the rule of law". In fact, what the anti-immigrant is calling for is a whole bunch of NEW laws to FURTHER criminalize our invited, welcome and needed guest workers.

The Nationalists had their chance. They got organized, held demonstrations and lobbied their representatives. Unfortunately for them, organizing sociopaths to demonstrate against our workforce did more to expose the lunacy of the anti-immigrants than it did to make us hate our guest workers.

Perhaps the anti-immigrant libertarian/republican types just need to get MORE organized. Something like a "National Sociopath" party. They could campaign on the promise of rounding up the jews... I mean Mexicans... and sending them away to prison camps in foreign countries.

Verified

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

kirk, says:

Vincent442:

What "rule of law"?

Please see Brown v. Board of Eduction for clarification about your error in alleging that Farmers Branch is "merely enforcing the rule of law."

You might also check out the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states “No state [may]… deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Even though you say Dallas and surrounding areas are "becoming ... Dickensian slums," the public libraries still provide access to documents containing U.S. laws.

Anonymous

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

Email Print 13 Comments Contribute

See more stories in:


Quantcast