Friday, May 11, 2007 , Updated
Restaurant Review: Tradicion
Tradicion Puts The “X” in Mex!
Over here at the Law Reviewers’ home office – which is actually not really an office, but an old DFW airport monorail AirTrans car that was taken out of service in 1989 and is now on cinderblocks in a lot behind a warehouse off of Industrial Boulevard, no, the other warehouse – we’re always thinking. “What new and unique restaurant has opened recently?” “What category of food have we not reviewed in a while?” “Does this milk smell spoiled to you?” “Who cares?” “Where is the nearest emergency room?!?” The only other thing we’ve wondered about lately is why aren’t there more places serving authentic Mexican cuisine around town? Dallas is saturated with good-but-greasy traditional Tex-Mex joints (pun intended). But what if your last remaining open artery is screaming for enchiladas that aren’t going to send you to Medical City (“The Happiest Place on Earth.”)? If you don’t want the three hour adventure that is Ciudad or the teenage hangout that is Taco Diner, we give you Tradicion (4334 Lemmon Ave, 214-520-5974). According to some guy at some place, it’s the brainchild of the owner of Avila’s on Maple Avenue, which is one of Dallas’ greatest gems that you should never go to when we go so as to create a wait for a table. In fact, forget what we just wrote.
The Law Reviewers
Two local attorneys applying their trained legal minds to the world of culinary arts (or at least it's sorta like that).

Anthony Lowenberg with Hermes Sargent Bates.
.

Michael Anderson with Bracewell & Giuliani
Hey, we’re regular folk; just like you, we put our pants on two legs at a time, too. But sometimes we like things a little more exciting. A little more exceptional. A little more extraterrestrial… okay, maybe not so much. Tradicion delivers. On our recent lunch visit, Tradicion’s lunch menu was filled with Tex-Mex staples such as enchiladas and tacos. Next to the staples were more unusual (but getting usual-er) dishes like ceviche and other traditional Mexican dishes like sopes – basically, mini-Mexican pizzas made from corn meal dough (and if you call them gorditas, we’ll throw a Chihuahua at you!). We went a little overboard on the appetizers and ordered three types of ceviche, as well as guacamole. The guacamole was excellent, if not distinguished. The ceviche was very good – not quite on par with the sophisticated ceviche dishes at Stephan Pyles – but they’re good enough to satisfy a craving and fit into a budget (OK, so we forgot to write down prices and there’s no menu online yet – more on the cost below). We also tried one of the aforementioned sopes filled with pork, lettuce and crema (cream), which, although small, made for a tasty and nicely textured little snack.
For entrees, the soft taco plates were excellent. The chicken tacos were filled with shredded, marinated chicken and came with greaseless pinto beans and rice. The brisket in the brisket tacos was tender and had a gentle smokey flavor that left us wishing more than two came in an order. Fortunately, we save our wishes for more important things like hoping Britney and K-Fed will patch things up. The taco plates were also served with sides of fresh onions, cilantro and jalapeños. The pork guiso (or pork stewed in tomatillo sauce), on the other hand, was a little too chewy and the sauce didn’t infuse the meat with its flavors the way other guisos we’ve tried at places around town have. We had the flan for dessert, which was solid with a nice vanilla flavor and creamy texture. The bill for three people, with four appetizers, three entrees, a couple of sodas and a dessert came to $20 per person, including tip. We could have easily gotten away with $10 per person if we weren’t such gluttons.
We’re not going to lie to you – after all, we’re lawyers (natch): we hope Tradicion succeeds. The building Mr. Avila chose is apparently cursed by the ghost of failed restaurants past who, instead of jangling chains and showing you visions of Bob Cratchit and Tiny Tim, rattle you with visions of past restaurant failures like Standard and Temptations (both Law Reviewers features, uh-oh!). The building most recently housed Fusion, which apparently fused the best elements of bad service and bland, overpriced sushi; not to be confused with Law Reviewer-favorite Fuse, which combines Tex-Asian cuisine in an urban setting with dog biscuits in place of the welcome mints. The staff at Tradicion was eager to please, and we would have liked to have seen more than three tables occupied during the lunch hour on a Friday. The bar in the corner, which now serves ceviche instead of sushi, had us hoping that someday it would host people waiting for a table on some Saturday night (we haven’t been for dinner yet, but we’re worried it looks like the lunch scene). We don’t like to make threats, but if you don’t go to Tradicion and tell your friends and relatives about it, we’ll use this space to publish that you are responsible for the tainted wheat gluten infesting our nation’s pet food. Yes, you. As Nancy Grace would say, prove to me you’re not guilty!
So, on our highly contagious, rapidly declining five-gavel scale, where one gavel is a series of painful injections with a large-gauge needle and five gavels is a handful of Flintstone’s chewable vitamins, we give Tradicion four gavels, or a swig of Nyquil and a beer (to take the edge off). Vamanos a Tradicion y viva la revolution! (por favor?)
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
- »Photo gallery: 2009 Dallas YMCA Turkey Trot
- »DISH at Ilume bringing chic dining to Cedar Springs in Dallas
- »Theater review: Port Twilight or The History of Science (A Chronicle of Folly, Wisdom and Madness)
- »Savor Dallas adds recipes and chef demos to website
- »Video preview: Adolphus Children's Parade
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|


bobdon000, says:
Law Reviewers:
I recommend you post pictures of the food and establishments you review.....remember "a picture is worth a 1,000 words..." thanks.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
The Law Reviewers, says:
What? Those headshots don't make you hungry? Point taken, bobdon000. We'll see about sneaking a camera into a future review.
Verified
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ms_ery, says:
I think TG should promise not to try a court case if you two don't try to review any more restaurants.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
twisteddog, says:
zing.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
The Law Reviewers, says:
[Slow clap] Well done, ms_ery (if that is your real name). As writers who appreciate a well crafted ripost, we applaud your clever turn of phrase, but we believe it was either Kirkegaard or Dick Van Patten who once said, "Don't hate, reciprocate!" While we readily admit to not being professional retaurant reviewers (that would require someone to actually start paying us), we do loves us some food and we're not ashamed to let people know what we think about the places where we eat it. So, you're going to have to get used to our reviews, and we hope you don't find the size of them intimidating. We look forward to your constructive criticism in the future. Game on! Sincerely, The Law Reviewers
Verified
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Teresa Gubbins, says:
i'd like to offer my personal testimony, i mean, testimonial, for the law reviewers' reviews. as befits my profession, i'm highly critical, not just of restaurants, but also restaurant critics; so this is no small praise for me to say that, so far, the law reviewers have nailed it correctly for me on pretty much every review they've written. i agree with their assessments, i like their style. in fact, i'd give their reviews the full 5 gavels, whatever the heck that means.
Staff
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
The Law Reviewers, says:
Thanks, TG! You're check is in the mail. ;)
Verified
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ms_ery, says:
I might agree with their restaurant assessments, on this one at least since I am familiar with its sister Avila. But did this review really you much about the food? They had three -- 3! --types of ceviche and didn't describe a single one. Actually, they didn't mention a single ingredient. What made one ceviche different from another? A few shrimp or scallops, one would presume.
I also think they put themselves too much in the review, and since posting my original comment, I've looked at some of their earlier stuff. It is all "we" heavy. I know they are baby reviewers, so their allusions to themselves were perhaps understandable when they began their column. However, it is now time to get rid of some of those personal adjectives. Let the restaurant and its food be the main subject.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
zing, zing, zing.
Having had the pleasure of eating there, wearing pants, of course, I can attest to the greatness of the food.
However, I was there in another life, before I was pronounced a weasel. And, weasels are known to eat anything put in front of them. So, it's me and twisteddawg now with the animal comments, and what do we know... ;-)
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
The Law Reviewers, says:
ms_ery, You have to understand it's tough being as awesome as we are. We'll try harder not to mention ourselves as much as we do, which is very like us. In summary, we are awesome. Oh, and ceviche is made from fish. And believe it or not, we've actually been writing reviews for a couple of years now (just not for Pegasus News). Oh yeah, and the Easter Bunny, not real. Sorry if that also comes as a shock. Check out our website: www.lawreviewers.com if you don't believe us -- about our reviews; for more on the Easter Bunny, check out your local public library or this season's hilarious Easter South Park episode. Peace.
Verified
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Teresa Gubbins, says:
you guys are cracking me up. in defense of ms_ery, she was a bona-fide "professional" -- one of the very best, in my humble opinion -- for many years.
that said, ms_ery, i find the law reviewers to be a refreshing alternative to the usual pompous reviews with their deadly cliches (see: "my dining companion," "swimming in a pool of gravy," "melted in the mouth like butter," and the ubiquitous use of "ubiquitous"). they approach the task with a sense of humor (in my book, humor = intelligence). they do more than report, they entertain. (which is good, because if they were reporting, they'd have mentioned that there were FIVE ceviches at Tradicion, not three. gotcha, law reviewers!)
do they talk about themselves a lot? possibly. then again, i'm not sure there's such as thing as "too much law reviewers"
Staff
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
twisteddog, says:
In defense of the lawyers, they're lawyers. So the best they can be is mildly funny and marginally informative. If you ignore them, they'll probably get bored and go away.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ms_ery, says:
In regard to the two lawyers's sense of "humor," I can only quote one of the best, certainly wittiest, reviewers of all time, though her subjects were plays and books, not restaurants: "Faithful reader threw up."
(Actually, I didn't check my source, the collected works of Dorothy Parker, and I think she may have been talking about a too-precious book that used a lot of baby-talk, so the actual quote was: "Faithful reader frew up."
Either way, the message stands.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ms_ery, says:
PS to the pair of lawyers: I know ceviche is fish (or other seafood). I also know it is of Peruvian origin, and often it goes by a different name in Mexican restaurants. The questions still stand: What made you order three versions and how did they differ?
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
^ zingarama.
I have two younger brothers that are lawyers. That's not funny at all.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
The Law Reviewers, says:
twisteddog: Not bored, just tiredhead. We're looking forward to checking out Olivella's based on your and WhitneyTM's good reviews.
ms_ery: Here are the answers to all of your questions -- What 3 ceviches did we order? We had the shrimp and lobster ceviches and some other funky fish that was either sea bass or sea bass's cousin Vinnie. What made us order them? Our dining companion... uh, we mean the guy who came along with us to eat lunch, wanted to order one and so did we and one plus one plus one makes three (or so we learned from Saturday morning tv). How did they differ? We recall the sea bass-y fish had a chewy texture that worked well with the citrus element, the shrimp had a nice piquant edge to it and the lobster was more mellow and earthy tasting. Did we order the Code Red? You're God Damn right we did!
Billusa99: Word.
Verified
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Chad Jones, says:
Hey, you people play nice. The Law Reviewers are good stuff. You'll be hard-pressed to find anywhere else two guys (let alone lawyers) who take time out of their busy, paperworked lives to craft <b>pro bono</b> reviews of local cuisine--and who actually make those reviews worth reading.
Verified
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
twisteddog, says:
What? Did somebody say something? Hello? I thought I heard something...
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
Hey, Chad, play nyce. She did first. Solo, no backup!
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
twisteddog, says:
I'd rather have pro bono lawyership than restaurant reviews.
For instance, is it OK to shoot a constable who jumps out of the bushes and tries to give me a traffic ticket when said constable is charged only with process serving (that costs something like $60 bucks to the person who needs to have something served -- is that crazy or what)?
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
UptownMatt, says:
We had dinner at Tradicion two weeks ago. Very good food - finally Ricky has a restaurant that serves margaritas! Heard that Avila's w/b getting liquor license amended to do so too. Food at Tradicion was excellent, servers still working out the kinks. Enjoyed the ceviche; marinated filet was very good and 'not another texas steak'. Nice to have a difference from Avilas, but same good attencion of family owners.
Understand lunch menu is closer to Tex-Mex than dinner - look forward to trying that soon.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
okme2, says:
Do you guys do parking tickets?
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ms_ery, says:
Re Chad Jones comment: The Pegagus staff is beginning to sound as thin-skinned as D's Front Burner.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rudy_G, says:
Law Reviewers, please allow Michael to work more and stop posting here. How can I get elected President if he is not billing?
Rudy G.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ms_ery, says:
Ooops! I misspelled Pegasus, a big journalistic transgression. Forgive me, people.
Anonymous
2 years, 6 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal