Content from our friends over at Richardson City News
Tuesday, April 1, 2008 , Updated
Dallas County Republican sheriff candidates show different levels of ethics
Law enforcement involves character at many levels. In these days and ages character does make a difference. The people should look closely at those who would stretch the limits of legality, especially when selecting a top law enforcement official. Consider the character difference between Lowell Cannaday and Jim Bowles, both seeking to replace Lupe Valdez as Dallas County Sheriff.
Section 255.006 of the Texas Election Code clearly states a candidate commits an offense if they engage in misleading use of an office title, and that the word "for" must be present indicating the office sought and that it must be at least 1/2 the print size of the name of the printed name of the office sought. Compare the campaign signs of the two candidates that appeared around the County Monday and judge for yourself. In a side by side comparison, Cannaday wins the ethics question. Bowles' party-neutered sign suggests his Republican roots may have been planted in sandy soil, where Cannaday's 30-year record with the party is more of a stone castle fortress of conviction. In any case, one would expect a top law enforcement official with a little experience to know and abide by the rules of the road.
Pegasus News content partner - Richardson City News
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
- »Theater review: The Santaland Diaries
- »Photo gallery: 2009 Dallas YMCA Turkey Trot
- »Concert review: Puscifer at Palladium Ballroom in Dallas (November 24)
- »DISH at Ilume bringing chic dining to Cedar Springs in Dallas
- »Theater review: Port Twilight or The History of Science (A Chronicle of Folly, Wisdom and Madness)
-
»Dallas County DA Craig Watkins, wife Tanya need to rethink political consulting
-
»Swine flu vaccine production going slowly in Dallas County
-
»Dallas district attorney Craig Watkins learns the golden rule of politics
-
»Catfight between Dallas County district attorney, commissioners presages 2010 elections
-
»Dallas County to launch new prescription drug savings program
|
an event
|
a restaurant
|
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
|
a deal
|
a pet
|
TexasPatriot, says:
Technically, you are correct. However, you must remember that Jim WAS the sheriff longer than many of your readers have been alive. He lost in the primary three years ago and even with the time lapse, many of his supporters still think of this election as a RE-election of a man who served Dallas County for many many years.
In this case, I don't think that the issue is of any real legal consequence. Jim and Lowell are both good and qualified men and I wish them both good fortune regardless of who wins the run off election.
Respectfully, Tony Smith, The Texas Patriot
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
allisonlgriffin, says:
I think the wording and font choice on the signs is more than "technical" -- it speaks volumes about the character of the former sheriff.
If he was running purely on his merits, he wouldn't feel the need to hide "former" with a tiny font. Instead, with a little trickery, he is hoping that name ID alone and the suggestion that he is somehow the incumbent being challenged in the primary will carry him through.
If Dallas County voters take 90 seconds to do their research, they'll remember why he is the FORMER sheriff and why we don't a repeat performance of the debacle four years ago.
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
Ahhh, local politics and another perfect example of why nobody pays attention to it until something goes terribly wrong.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
John McClelland, says:
"For" is too small. Also "re-elect" is misleading in the fact in that it implies he is the current office holder. That is a Class A misdemeanor.
The only difference is whether or not someone wants to persue the complaint with the Texas Ethics Commission and spend months waiting for them to do anything. I knew of someone a year ago who violated ยง 255.007, but I didn't want to spend the time to file the complaint.
Though I think the main problem here is when someone thinks they're above the law and dismiss allegations when they are clearly in the wrong.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
*but I didn't want to spend the time to file the complaint.*
Not to mention, it's this kind of nit-picky BS getting blown up in the media that turns people away from local politics.
I hate myself for reading this article in its entirety.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
TexasPatriot, says:
I've known Lowell Cannaday and Jim Bowles both casually for many years and have always respected them. Lowell won the run off and I believe that he will be a great sheriff. Congratulations to Lowell!
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal