Wednesday, April 2, 2008 , Updated
North Richland Hills nipple-ring wearer gets award
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Mandi Hamlin, 37, of North Richland Hills, who got the Transportation Security Administration to change a procedure after they roughed her up because of her nipple rings, received an award from the Women’s Leadership Exchange, a networking/professional group. Called the Bold Spirit Award, it honors women who take action that has a positive impact on others.
If Hamlin's protest has put even a slight chink in the silly, territorial, gropey attitudes of the TSA, then she is definitely a hero.
Posted by T.G.
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
-
»American Airlines launches wi-fi widget to allow travelers to find wi-fi equipped flights
-
»Dallas Fort Worth Airport expects 4.1% increase in Thanksgiving 2009 travel
-
»Fort Worth-based Allied Pilots Association expresses support for striking Finnair pilots
-
»Dallas-based Southwest Airlines confirms passengers are not superstitious
-
»American Airlines CEO reaffirms commitment to retain Japan Airlines as long-term partner
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|

Rawlins Gilliland, says:
If any man on this planet qualifies as a feminist advocate I most certainly do.
But to applaud this women being praised as a hero because she was self-centered enough (on a bad day) and clueless enough (on a good one)...to be wearing any metal on one's person going through (duh) metal detectors at airports after 9/11 (duh) then what’s next? Someone being praised and honored as a hero because they attempted to take a full sized bottle of Prell shampoo through security when for two years the 2-3 ounce rule applies? Reward the wench we wore metal gladiator boots that could not be removed without a special key that was left at home? Touted as a feminist rebel because they wore an under-wire bra and refused to let the security people scan her breast area?
Maybe we can all be rewarded for all the times any of us have been self-important and held up the line at the airport because we either could not read what the 'new (6-7 years) rules' are. Or when we simply refused to believe they applied to us. Let's call it the Dumb-and-Broad Rebel Trophy to be awarded (natch) by the ever-protective-of-victimized-women icon Gloria Allred.
*Yes the same women who not that long ago testified that men falsely accused of fathering a child by a woman who knowingly falsely accused him under oath........ should still pay child support because said male 'accepted that the child was his'. Yep, that's the woman who 'awarded' Ms. Hamlin for her 'brave' defiance of metal detection federal airport laws in a time of war.*
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Ashley Lyell, says:
I really do see your point, but at the same time she offered to be pulled aside and show them the nipple rings and the TSA refused - said she had to take them out before she could board. That's the point where I see them taking it way too far. If they had let her step out of line and show an agent, problem fairly averted. But forcing her to remove them? What good does removing them do in this situation versus a patdown? Especially when they didn't force her to remove her navel ring. Are the terrorists creating bombs out of nipple rings specifically now?
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rick Yost, says:
You know, I think it's great that this chick forced the TSA to change their ways, but a hero she's not. An idiot maybe.
I knew the last time I went through airport security I'd be asked to put my watch, phone, keys, and pocket change into one of those little baskets. It's a 'metal' thing! That's why when I travel I don't wear my 'helmet-stud'.
And that whole thing with the pliers makes me shudder.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
Ashley. I understand what you say, and yes, it makes sense. But none of us should be wearing our metal body piercings when going through a metal detector we clearly knew we would be put through at any world airport.... NONE of this is new. What was new to this women was, contrary to what she thought, the rules and laws we all must follow when we fly in the 21rst century applied to her. The piercings she wears are her business. Except when she attempts to wear them when in line at an airport security. At which point it becomes everyone's problem.
PS: Returning home recently from Fresno, the middle aged woman in front of me began screaming when, after insisting that she had ‘no liquids’ in her carry on, and it being taken off the X-Ray line and checked and ….voila……. tons of jars and bottles of cosmetics and makeup and juices, etc. She screamed as they confronted her,,,,,,,,,,,she who had lied……… and cried as they confiscated her face cream that she insisted cost her $300. (It was clearly not working). We were all delayed, she created a ruckus.... and I finally let her have it and the entire crowd applauded. (Me. Not her.)
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Ashley Lyell, says:
I agree with you - people need to know about all of the new rules and regulations before they fly. Face cream lady sounds insane and she has no excuse for her behavior whatsoever. Before October 2007, I hadn't flown in 5 years. Nerd that I am, I went on the TSA website to see what I had to stuff into a plastic bag (do they honestly suspect people of making liquid eyeliner bombs?) so I could be prepared and not cause any problems with my lack of knowledge.
What really bugs me about this entire fiasco is how it was handled by the TSA - they caused a bigger scene than she did by refusing to let her step into a private screening area and show the piercings. People just lift up their shirts to show navel piercings all the time, no problem. Why was THIS situation so different to the TSA agents? Just bugs me, that's all - I'm all about consistency.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
My bet this that because this issue was her breasts, the potential for ramifications in a litigious society was too dicey to do a 'look see'. Translation: She'd show her breast piercing(s) and then she would get a call from Gloria Allred and be on GMA talking about the woman agent who 'violated' her by 'making' her show her breasts. Take that one to the bank. Almost.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
Ashley obviously hates America.
I can see where both sides are coming from. If I were one of the security peeps, I certainly wouldn't let anybody by if the detector goes off...I'd also give unlikely suspects the evil eye every chance I got. No stone goes unturned, granny! (I don't think I'd have a job very long, btw)
I applaud this lady for enacting the change she felt necessary and leaving it at that, rather than suing Boeing for making planes she had to go through TSA to get on.
Who cares if she gets some ridiculous award? If this story motivates other people to whine about the TSA, Rawlins will surely yell at them anyhow. All is well in the universe, imo.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
OK everyone -- CHILL! You are all arguing from a complete lack of knowledge of what happened.
She did NOT alarm the mag unit -- she cleared it. Body piercings typically do NOT set off the mag unit. For anyone that travels a lot and reads, this is COMMON knowledge. For example, earings do NOT alarm a mag unit.
She was sent to secondary for another reason, where she was wanded. Said wand being super-sensitive. THAT'S what alarmed. TSA was totally out of bounds on this matter and that's why they are changing procedures for this.
'nuff said...
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
Postscript: I'm American Platinum and traveled, shall we say, a bunch, and have, yes, more than once seen piecings set off alarms although it's been a while. Kennedy (NYC) and Heathrow (London) to name two. But according to my cousin who works for American, it's, like earrings, etc; a crap shoot if and when they do...so I would (guess) it has something to do with size (see? Size matters!) since sometimes a regular belt of mine will set off an alarm while other belts with metal buckles don't.
My bottom line: Instead of this woman raising her blouse, I'm automatically raising my eyebrow at any 'hero's' award given by the Al Sharpton of pseudo-feminism, Gloria Allred.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
DC, says:
Based on my experience over the last 3 weeks, I can say that nipple rings alone will not set off the gate detectors at LAX, MIA, DCA, and YMQ.
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
tmi, DC.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
DC, says:
I could take Miami off the list, if you like.
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
TSA regulations indicate that standard procedure for piercings is a pat-down, with the OPTION of removal of the piercings instead of the pat-down. Hamlin wasn't informed of this option, and was instructed that she had to remove the piercings if she wanted to fly.
From TSA:
Statement on Alleged Improper Screening at Lubbock, Texas News & Happenings March 28, 2008
TSA has reviewed the circumstances related to the screening of a passenger with body piercings that occurred recently in Lubbock, Texas. It appears that the Transportation Security Officers involved properly followed procedures in that incident. They rightly insisted that the alarm that was raised be resolved. TSA supports the thoroughness of the Officers involved as they were acting to protect the passengers and crews of the flights departing Lubbock that day.
TSA has reviewed the procedures themselves and agrees that they need to be changed. In the future TSA will inform passengers that they have the option to resolve the alarm through a visual inspection of the article in lieu of removing the item in question. TSA acknowledges that our procedures caused difficulty for the passenger involved and regrets the situation in which she found herself. We appreciate her raising awareness on this issue and we are changing the procedures to ensure that this does not happen again.
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
OpusthePoet, says:
All I have to say is I haven't been able to fly since my hip was put back together with 3.3 Lbs of stainless steel, raising a complaint about it got me on the "no fly" list so that even now that the hardware is sitting on my dresser instead of inside my leg I can't clear security.
Anonymous
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
Clearly if you'd have gone behind the curtain and taken it out rather than complaining, you wouldn't be in this predicament.
Verified
1 year, 7 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal