Content from our friends over at Best Southwest Citizen
Monday, August 4, 2008 , Updated
Former Lancaster mayoral candidate embroiled in home rental scam
The problems in the housing market have struck communities throughout the nation, including in the Best Southwest. Police believe two local men took advantage of the housing bubble burst by renting out homes they didn’t actually own or have any right to be in.
On July 28 Cedar Hill police arrested Jackie Lewis, a local pastor they believe was a running a rental scam in unoccupied homes. In one case they believe Lewis drilled into the locks on a pre-foreclosed home and leased it as if he owned it. Detective Steve Lafferty said police can currently link Lewis to one residence but he is a suspect in several fraudulent purchases or leases in Lake Ridge.
They are also pursuing the link between Lewis and Morris Mosley, a flamboyant fixture in Lancaster politics who DeSoto police arrested several weeks ago for similar charges. Mosley is also a minister and his fiery speeches in Lancaster elections and public forums are often not far from sermonizing. Victims in this case told police they paid Mosley $1,150 a month in rent at three separate residences over an eight-month span. That family realized they’d been duped when they moved into a residence on a Thursday and that Saturday two realtors came by to show the home.
Mosley told police he had permission from the owners to take possession of the property, but officials didn’t believe him. During the hotly contested May election, Mosley ran for mayor on a platform promising economic development. He promised to use his business experience to bring Fortune 500 companies to Lancaster. Fortunately for Lancaster voters, they didn’t buy into Mosley’s platform and instead elected local businessman Marcus Knight. Cedar Hill police expect to indict Mosley on charges soon.

Pegasus News content partner - Best Southwest Citizen
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
- »Students nationwide react to reductions in state funding; Southern Methodist University sees no backlash
- »Freshman at Southern Methodist University wins C-USA weekly award
- »Chef-owner of now closed Dallas City Market opens Petaluma Cafe in Cedar Hill
- »Bailey's Prime Plus steakhouse opening in Uptown Village at Cedar Hill on April 29
- »Cedar Hill man shoots would-be car thief dead
-
»Southlake man thinks he was tricked, overcharged by Ticketmaster subsidiary
-
»Carrollton-based T.G.I. Friday's investigating alleged snake head incident
-
»West Virginia sues Irving debt settlement company
-
»Lancaster voters made right choice in not electing Morris Mosley
-
»Richardson-based Credit Solutions of America accused of fraud
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|

interestedcitizen, says:
Why is it that preachers got involved in this scam?
Does it have something to do with opposition to "evil capitalism?" Is this taught in "liberation theology" classes? Is there, in the minds of these preachers, the idea that foreclosure is a form of taking from the poor, and that these scams are a way of taking property back for the oppressed masses? Do the preachers think it is immoral for houses to remain empty in the face of homelessness, held by the money lenders, who seek profit in the form of interest and capital appreciation? Do the preachers feel morally justified in taking that empty housing and turning it over to people who would otherwise be homeless?
If these preachers feel morally justified in what they are doing, how can they, in good faith, charge rent, which is just like usury, without, in turn, making a financial investment in the form of a loan?
If these preachers were truly motivated by a moral philosphy, wouldn't they simply occupy these houses for their tenants and let their poor tenants live there for nothing? Wouldn't they, also, feel a burden to preserve the property while they were occupying it, since abusing the property of others is a form of stealing, in violation of the commandment, "thou shalt not steal?"
Do not these preachers act immorally, making a return on investment that is infinite in size, given their zero investment, while the so called "greedy capitalists" are limited in the return on investment they can get by what the market is willing to pay? Do these pastors fail to realize that capitalists and lenders build wealth slowly, through risk and hard work? Do they not understand that when capitalists take risks, they are just as likely to lose wealth as gain wealth? Do they not understand that, even when capitalists take risks, risk involves hard work, preparation, study, and sometimes sweat and labor?
Or does this represent the naked greed of the pastors involved? Do the preachers lack any moral philosophy to guide their actions? Is this simply a way the preachers amass power and wealth for themselves? Is this completely self serving, or is it an outgrowth of a delusion brought on by a moral philosophy emphasizing the duty to occupy this earth, to intervene on behalf of the poor, and to make sure that no property is withheld from the market when there are people who need it? Or is this simply a means by which these pastors take advantage of the poor and unsuspecting? Do the preachers abuse their positions of trust to take advantage of the poor?
If these pastors are driven by naked greed, how many more of them and their kind are out there? How can we know when people are driven by pure greed, even while they use slogans and gain power that lead us to believe they are driven by a willingness to be self sacrificial?
Is anyone in this world truly driven by self sacrifice, or can we trace all efforts to be beneficial to desire to acquire wealth, power, and status, with the ultimate goal of ensuring our long security?
Anonymous
1 year, 3 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
momzilla, says:
Discouraging, isn't it?
But there are people out there called to self-sacrifice and who are humbly serving others the best way that they know how in the course of their daily lives. The thing is that these are not typically self-aggrandizing so you might not know their names or recognize them on the street.
Rule of thumb: If they go by the title "Reverend" or "Pastor" in the course of their secular activities, they are suspect.
Anonymous
1 year, 3 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal