Friday, February 1, 2008
Will pre-paid phone limits aimed at crime fighting inadvertantly hurt poor Texans?
Email
|
Print
|
Tell us your story
|
Comments (7)
|
State Sen. John Carona (R-Dallas), said during a news conference this week that he wants to file legislation to “go after” gangs by clamping down on pre-paid cell phone purchases:
Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas, said during a news conference at Dallas police headquarters that gang members are able to coordinate their crimes on phones that they simply throwaway. Unlike conventional phones, police are unable to trace conversations and determine ownership of so-called pre-paid phones that are becoming increasingly popular for gang members to use to communicate with one another.
Carona and Dallas police chief David Kunkle said law enforcement officers are becoming increasingly concerned about the number of “transnational gangs” that are committing crimes throughout the state, many of them organized through the use of prepaid cellphones. The gangs are crossing the border of Mexico into Texas, where drugs and street violence have become more prevalent.
Of course, this sounds like a good idea. We all want to clamp down on gang activity. However, there are two flaws. The first is in the statement above: “Unlike conventional phones, police are unable to trace conversations and determine ownership of so-called pre-paid phones…”
That isn’t 100 percent true. Calls made with a pre-paid cell phone, and pre-paid cell phone records can be subpoenaed just like every other cell phone record. Yes, tracing ownership may be more difficult, but you can still trace, using towers the calls bounce off, roughly where the calls are being made.
The second problem is this:
Carona said that during the next legislative session he will introduce a bill that will require people to provide identification before they can buy a prepaid cellphone.
This is yet another hit on the poor. There are many poor Texans for whom pre-paid cell phones are their only means of communication, as they have either insufficient credit or no permanent address to actually obtain home telephone or regular cell phone service. In addition, the ID barrier will prevent many Texans who legitimately use pre-paid cell phones for communication from being able to get them. The argument here is similar to the one that goes with Voter ID.
It seems a bit of an overkill to require an ID to get a pre-paid cell phone. The same thing could be accomplished by requiring that pre-paid cell phone companies must collect the name of every person who buys their product in Texas, without the ID requirement. After all, if a gang member is going to use the cell phone for criminal purposes, then they’ll probably use a fake ID to purchase it anyway. And, what about the Internet? You can buy a pre-paid cell phone on the Internet. And, I’m not sure the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution would allow the Texas Legislature to restrict the sale of pre-paid cell phones over the internet to Texas residents.
Clearly, it is no solution to this problem. It is just another thing that looks like a good crime fighting measure which really doesn’t amount to much.

Pegasus News content partner - Capitol Annex
Related stories
- Week-in-view: Won’t you be ours? (Feb. 7, 2008)
See more stories in:
Find...
Today
GlamAmour's Bewitching Burlesque Remember Abe Weinstein's Colony Club? How about Jack Ruby's Carousel? Dang, you're old. (And dirty!) Hearken back to the golden days of Dallas burlesque with women who tease to please. More info
Blogs
- Deli-cious irony
Square Pegs - I so wish we had laser eyes
Square Pegs - Why I think the ecomomy is even scarier than I thought
Square Pegs
Latest comments
- TravisRex on Dallas' old Parkland Hospital complex will soon reopen as office buildings: I wonder if SWAT and the DEA will still use it for training exercises? I suppose the receptionists w...
- lisagetti on State Fair vendor shows a random act of kindness: Yes, Rich and I loooovvve the Chili Parlor; now even more so! Go Tom! They have been showing us kind...
- Mike Orren on Why I think the ecomomy is even scarier than I thought: *Auto makers have struggled in the past months but they are nowhere near the bottom. The next year i...
- xdavidwattsx on Why I think the ecomomy is even scarier than I thought: Agreed. Auto makers have struggled in the past months but they are nowhere near the bottom. The next...
Latest reviews
- Collin Gouldin on Ricky Ray's BBQ: The food was pretty good, but maybe they should stick to catering… The store front wasn’t very org...
- 1concernedcitizen on Fat Joe's Pizza (Allen): Believe me as an overweight person I know good pizza and I promise you the pizza was nasty. I am not...
- 1concernedcitizen on El Fenix Mexican Restaurant (Dallas / Inwood & Lemmon): Raise the flag and bring more of those great desserts…...

Comments
Scott Doyle Verified
It seems a bit of an overkill to require an ID to get a pre-paid cell phone. The same thing could be accomplished by requiring that pre-paid cell phone companies must collect the name of every person who buys their product in Texas, without the ID requirement.
I'm sure gangsters obey the honor system at every opportunity.
At least online there's a record of the transaction - be it on a card or online account of some sort, so you could at least make the connection of what accounts they're buying phones from. Even if they're using a stolen account, I doubt they shotgun random mailing addresses to get 'em.
I'm not saying the legislation should go through...just sayin' let's be realistic. Obviously you're not straight gansta.
8 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Billusa99 Anonymous
Only in Texas: have to buy a cell phone and be registered with it. But, you can buy a gun at a gun show, carry it in your glove box now, all is copacetic.
Corona is watching HBO's Wired too much.
8 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
EdWeirdness Anonymous
By "trans-national" do you mean international, or simply gangs from other states also? Simply allowing Dallas police to interact with ICE as so many other cities and towns have done might be a better way to address international crime. Arguably, if 10% (I suspect the real number is substantially higher, but I really don't have the facts) of crime is committed by illegal aliens, addressing illegal immigration and enforcing our existing laws would offer the best chance of reducing "tarnsnational gang related crimes". I guess it just makes better "politically correct" sense to punish, intrude on, or inconvenience everyone than make an effort to address the "real problem"?
8 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
OpusthePoet Anonymous
I don't want the gov't to know everything I say and do. Just because what I'm doing is legal and aboveboard today doesn't mean that it will always be that way in the future, and I don't want to just hand that information over to the "Man". Gov't should fear the people, not people the gov't.
8 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
So...you're saying you'll be doing illegal things in the future, and the "Man" shouldn't be able to track your shadiness? Am I missing something?
8 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
DC Anonymous
It's called privacy.
8 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
Right, but you're not exactly preventing something like this from being enacted if you're admitting to shadiness.
Counterproductive ITT.
I actually just like the term shady and its derivatives, so carry on.
This Carona character sure is getting his name out there on PegNews, though. I see what he did there.
8 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Post a comment
(Requires free PegasusNews.com account.)