Thursday, February 28, 2008 , Updated
Obama generates cheers, boos at Duncanville rally
Stating his support of a crackdown on employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens, Senator Barack Obama spoke on topics ranging from immigration policy to Hillary Clinton to George W. Bush on Wednesday (Feb. 27), as he addressed a crowd of supporters packed into a Duncanville school gymnasium.
Obama mostly garnered cheers during his speech, but at one point generated a round of boos - noting that, after the handover of the presidency, George W. would be coming back to Texas.
posted by JM
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
- »UPDATED: Owners of Cherry Pit in Duncanville head to court to challenge citations
- »Duncanville police search for man who shot and killed a woman
- »Money laundering added to charges against owner of Cherry Pit in Duncanville
- »TxDOT seeking public input on design of frontage roads on Interstate 20 in Duncanville
- »Barack Obama returns for encore appearance on Wednesday, this time in Duncanville
-
»George Bush moves into Dallas home, oh joy, oh ring the bells
-
»Lake Highlands dance team will perform at Texas-centric inaugural ball
-
»Dallas entrepreneurs cash in on Obama fever
-
»Obama won national election, but Richardson chose McCain
-
»Dallas-based Southwest Airlines adds extra flights for Presidential Inauguration
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|

xdavidwattsx, says:
I'm curious as to why Bush AND Cheney feel the need to move to Dallas. One of them is bad enough.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Alex Bentley, says:
Damn it, don't tempt me into making an inappropriate joke this early in the morning!
Okay, this is cleaner:
<img src="http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/O/c/bush_dick_hands.jpg">
Staff
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
Knowing this pair is coming to Dallas reminds me of the old days in San Francisco when you would get a call from the Free Clinic...that someone you have slept with had gonorrhea and syphilis.
Verified
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
xdwx... Bssh follows Cheney for the same reason Charlie McCarthy never went anywhere without Edgar Bergen.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
Taking cheap shots at Bush is easy and unintelligent.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
xdavidwattsx, says:
It's easy but I don't know about unintelligent.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
viva_la_malcriada, says:
"Taking cheap shots at Bush is easy and unintelligent."
You forgot "therapeutic."
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
and childish
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
pnewsgal, says:
...and protected by the First Amendment...for the time being...
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
And highly overdue.
Verified
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
and boring
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
Yes, for 7 years...boring. On that we all agree.
Verified
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
CastleHills, says:
Of course no one on the right ever takes cheap shots at the Clintons.
nooooooooo, never.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
It's not about right vs. left, it is about civil discourse.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
luniz, says:
which in case you hadn't noticed, isn't really something that applies to discussing politicians.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
If you want to change things it has to start somewhere.
I am only taking a cue from B. Obama who (it seems) wants to take the high road.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
luniz, says:
I don't think any of us feel any need to take a particularly high road with regard to Mr. Bush, whom many of us regard as emblematic of the worst kind of people in charge of the most powerful institutions affecting our daily lives. Perhaps if he had dealt with the American people honestly from the beginning he'd be treated better; instead he's squandered any goodwill or benefit of the doubt that most evil, baby hating, secular humanists would be willing to extend.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
Does that (diatribe) make you feel better?
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
luniz, says:
just trying a little civil discourse...I guess you're willing to criticize others for not engaging, but not willing to engage yourself. typical republican...
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
First I am Libertarian, not Republican. Second I am very willing to engage on issues and policy, but not argumentum ad hominem.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Rawlins Gilliland, says:
Please: A moratorium on 2007's 'in' expression 'ad hominem'. Otherwise I will scream like Rick Perry (about gay Boy Scouts).
I miss the good old days when 'ad hominem' was thought to me a kind of seasonal candied corn sold in third world countries to vacationing liberals. Or a feminist denunciation of male advertisers.
Like 2006's word 'gravitas'. That was once a cheap French sauce but Matt Lauer used it to describe the fight between Rosie O' Donnell and Star Jones and the rest became com-box history.
Verified
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Billusa99, says:
"Fool!," bobdon000. "You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia,' but only slightly less well known is this: 'Never go in against an Avatar when wit is on the line.'"
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bobdon000, says:
Rawlie: A little history lesson is due you.
It was 2000 (for the 2001 elections) not 2006, when the word "gravitas" became over-used.
Mostly by media types to describe George Bush, although the Republican party used it frequently to ascribe the foreign policy experience of Dick Cheney.
Anonymous
1 year, 9 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal