Jump to: site navigation, content.

Friday, January 11, 2008 , Updated 11:26 a.m., January 14, 2008

UPDATED x2: HGTV Dream Home in Tyler on the block Saturday


The prize doesn't do you much good when you can't pay the taxes and it's a buyer's market. UPDATE: The house sold for $1.325 million, while the contents (and some things from elsewhere) sold at really high prices.

(Scroll down for update on the actual sale.)

Dream Home or nightmare?

Beard Auction

Dream Home or nightmare?

Every year, April avidly follows and repeatedly enters the HGTV Dream Home competition. They build a ridiculously amazing house, furnish it, throw in a car and some extra prizes and give the whole thing away.

The sad truth, though, is that seven of the nine winners have had to sell the house because they couldn't afford the tax burden. HGTV always builds these monstrosities in restricted communities that have all kinds of covenants that prevent the winners from using them for commercial purposes like Bed & Breakfasts -- eliminating any hope of holding on to the prize.

See the original tour

HGTV: Tyler Dream Home

Perhaps the saddest example yet goes on the auction block in Tyler this weekend. The Tyler home, given away in 2005, was by far the biggest and nicest one yet. The Chicago family who won moved to Tyler and tried to make a go of it. But the $600k / year in property taxes and upkeep has become too much, so they went to an auctioneer to avoid foreclosure.

By my math, since the house is expected to sell for about a third of retail, this family's going to come out behind anyway. Nice prize. I imagine HGTV makes out like a bandit on the sponsorships on this deal, excites thousands of entrants, and then this happens year in and out.

We're probably going to go check out the house and auction tomorrow. But I'm no longer so eager to see us win such a prize.

UPDATE: We went to the auction Saturday, where there were roughly 500 people about. (The Tyler Telegraph says 1,200, but I don't buy it.) Three of them were there to bid on the house; about half were there to bid on the contents; and the rest seemed just generally curious. There were crews from several local (to Tyler) TV stations as well as a reporter and photog from the AP. Don Cruz, the homeowner, was there too.

With one notable exception, things were really well organized -- there was a bank of porta-potties; a concession with barbecue and drinks; and a quickly moving line to tour the house.

The only problem was that the auction folks were really strict about your path through the home, but only after you'd gone a direction from which they mandated no return. We checked out the ground level and then, seeing a long line to go upstairs, went to check out the downstairs/pool/boathouse area. Only when we tried to go back upstairs were we told that once down you couldn't go back up. And with short time until the beginning of the auction, we were S.O.L. on checking out the upstairs.

In person, the house was less impressive than it had been on TV. It was not nearly as private as it had looked, with tiny vacation cabins within 50 yards of the front door and a restaurant and clubhouse for the surrounding development as a next-door neighbor. The materials and decor inside weren't anything spectial. And, who really needs seven bedrooms and a separate boathouse? That said, the view was remarkable.

The home itself was the first thing to be auctioned. Wesley Beard, the auctioneer, was a flamboyant pro of the highest order while still keeping things down home. (He came off like our own Mark-Brian Sonna playing an East Texas Auctioneer.) He started out with a long, bid-building speech, from which one could glean:

  • Despite rumors that had been going around in the community, the family did have full title to sell the house and the fact that the city still owned the land and leased it back meant nothing, as that's SOP for all Lake Tyler property. There was a Title agent on site and the owners were paying for title insurance.
  • The house is on the tax rolls for $1.8 million
  • Bids would require 10% down and would have until January 28 to close, without mutual extension by both parties.
  • Contrary to reports that the property taxes and fees are onerous, the annual property tax is $25,000 and the land lease is $700 per year. (We figure the problem was likely a mortgage taken out to pay the income taxes and operating expenses on the seven-air-conditioner monstrosity.
  • Tyler is a wonderful city for such a home and an ideal place for a millionaire to live and profit by the purchase and eventual resale of this home. The city is mysteriously recession-proof, and property values defy gravity.
  • There is also an opportunity to buy all the surrounding property in "The Reserve at Lake Tyler" development, thus solving the lack of privacy we noted. See, the developer is in bankruptcy, and the whole project is up for sale.
  • We should not feel sorry for the Cruz family, who got to live in their dream house for two years and are now happily back home in Chicago. So we shouldn't feel as though a decision to bid was tantamount to picking at the bones of the unfortunate.
  • However, once over that hump, when determining how high to bid, we should feel sorry for the Cruz family who had gone through the financial wringer on this deal.
  • There are a couple minor encroachments (oops!) including the dog pen.

With all that behind, Beard went to work selling the house. I really wish I had clued in and turned on my recorder sooner, because this was an Oscar-worthy performance that was equal bits tent revival, snake oil sales, aw-shucks fumbling, cheerleading, telethoning and sales 101. It was Art. If I ever have to auction off anything, I know who I'm calling.

I did finally tune in for the end, which you can listen to below:

The final bid

The winner at $1,325,000, was one red-sweatered Rick Mullins, who did not wish to speak to the media. He did, however, stay around to bid on some of the furnishings and appointments, including another $1,900 for the custom doghouse.

Then Beard started auctioning the contents of the house, and then some -- There were a number of items, including an interminable parade of oriental rugs, that didn't look like they were part of the Dream House. Locals confirmed that Beard had brought the rugs, as well as a number of other items from his warehouse in Jacksonville, in an effort to capitalize on the large crowd.

We were hoping to pick up some of the wicker pool and patio furniture, which went late in the auction, so we were there for most of it-- A good four hours.

Perhaps Tyler does have an unusually resilient economy after all -- We were surprised at the prices that the bidders (most of whom seemed to be locals) were paying. Not-terribly-attractive framed prints were going for $500. Wicker baskets and glassware that looked like it came from World Market went for $40-$50. It's hard to tell what the homeowners got because of the outside items, but our back of the napkin estimate was around another $30k.

The best bargains were on unusually large pieces of furniture, presumably because the market was limited by the number of people with the space for it. We struck out on the patio furniture, because we couldn't rationalize paying north of $1,000 for a three-piece set with cushions that already needed reupholstering. I did botch buying some snazzy office chairs at a steal price of $250. He who hesitates is lost, especially at the tail end of an East Texas auction.

UPDATE 2: Through a little research, we think we've learned a bit about the purchaser. There is a Rick Mullins in Westlake who does business in Tyler would appear to have the means to make such a purchase. Mike Bullock called his office this morning and they wouldn't confirm he was the purchaser, but they also didn't deny it. Our new friends at the Tyler Telegraph confirmed that the buyer was from the area. Plus, public records searches don't turn up any other good Rick Mullins candidates around.

Still researching, but in the meantime, the in-between time, here's some things that the Rick Mullins in question said to the Dallas Morning News in a poorly-packaged web sidebar to a piece on broker disclosures.



Share: 
del.icio.us Digg DZone Facebook Fark Google Google Reader Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter YahooBuzz YahooMyWeb YCombinator


Mike Orren, verified:

An emailing, non-comment-posting reader doesn't share my sympathy for the "winners":

*"Those people who won the HGTV Dream House are fools! They should have struck while the iron was hot and sold the house coming out like bandits. Why would they think they could live in a house they couldn't afford? Why would they fight the zoning laws? Why wouldn't they recognize they were given a gift for prosperity?*"

*"I have compassion for them that someone smarter didn't tell them they were fools!"*

My problem is that the whole point of the contest is to get this great, wonderfully livable house -- that almost no one could live in.

AND that (correct me if I'm wrong, tax-savvy peeps), they get taxed on the whole value of the prize package. (I'm talking income, not property.) But there's a pretty narrow universe of people who would buy a $4.5 million home in Tyler, meaning that it's sure to sell for less than that, even if it's sold immediately.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

littlekinder, anonymous:

Didn't a weird mini-version of this happen when Oprah gave her whole studio audience free cars? It seemed a lot of people couldn't keep them because they couldn't pay the tax on it... or something like that.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Alex Bentley, staff:

Google ads are great -- right underneath this warning tale of a story is ... yep, an ad to enter the next HGTV Dream House Giveaway! If you click on that ad after reading the story, then you're <a href="http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2008/jan/08/intoxicated-burleson-man-drives-car-mailbox-home/">a moron</a>.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Alex Bentley, staff:

Okay, that ad's not really for HGTV -- just a sneaky ad masquerading as something else. Now who's the moron? On another note, here's a story about Oprah's "gift", littlekinder: http://www.nbc5.com/news/3750669/deta...

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

littlekinder, anonymous:

So it's still true... no such thing as a free lunch... or car... or house...

Next you'll be telling me not all lotto winners live happily ever after.

It's weird when we materialistic Americans can't even be... materialistic.

Taxes - blech.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Billusa99, anonymous:

You're right, Mike... they would have owed (income) taxes on 35% of the home's value when they won it. Just like winning millions in Vegas or the lottery, except there is no cash cupboard in a house to pay it with.

Keep in mind it's not in Tyler proper -- it's on the lake outside of there so maybe someone will acquire it for a vacation home.

And, I agree... it was the coolest house they have done so far, bar none!

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Lisa Lawrence Merritt, verified:

So what was the result? How did the auction go?

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

John Meyer, staff:

Ting - according to <a href="http://www.tylerpaper.com/article/20080112/NEWS08/781759181">this article</a> in the Tyler paper, the auctioneers hammered down on a $1.3 million bid.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

April Powell, staff:

Actually, the exact bid was $1,325,000. I think Mike has more details, with photos, to come . . .

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Scott Doyle, verified:

Just read this.

I'd happily take a new car or house, regardless of the tax burden. I wouldn't be moving in to the home or driving the car, though. You're boned on the car for income tax (just sell it and take the difference), but I'm pretty sure you can keep the home as an investment property. So long as you don't move into it, hold for a year and have it taxed as a <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/itax/tips/20010305a.asp?caret=1">long-term capital gain</a> rather than income.

Per article above, if the home doesn't depreciate over the year you have to hold it, it's a 15% long-term capital gains tax instead of 35% income tax. Even if it does depreciate, 25% capital gains tax versus 35% income tax...a lot more goes scenario, i.e. if the property depreciates they'd still have a gain since they paid nothing for the house but it effects various amounts used in the taxation process.

Considering they got $250k (bump that down to $162,500 after taxes) up front, that should have helped them considerably with ad valorem (property) taxes and minimal utilities of a vacant house. I'm guessing that $600k figure included the income tax burden, b/c property taxes are generally not more than 3% (or even 2.5%) - meaning less than $70k a year.

Of course, vacancy isn't the best idea (especially in Tyler, bleh) so you could surely find tenants to rent rooms and pay a property manager to live there, ensuring nothing gets out of hand. I figure the rent of others would essentially pay the property manager and utilities, the $162,500 would easily pay for property tax over the year and a half you hold it (one year leases, half a year to sell), and you bank at least two thirds of the sale on a $2.2M house after various fees and long-term capital gains tax.

I'm no professional so don't take any of this and run with it, emailing me when you screw up your life - I'm just saying there are better ways to go about this and still make some good money off the deal. Even if they only netted $1M after consulting a professional rather than just moving in, they could get a very nice (more affordable on the overhead costs) home...and not face foreclosure.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Mike Orren, verified:

*"You could surely find tenants to rent rooms and pay a property manager to live there, ensuring nothing gets out of hand."*

There are city restrictions that specifically prevented them from renting the property to multiple tenants.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Scott Doyle, verified:

Meh, could still afford security measures, property taxes, and minimal utilities while vacant with the $250k (or whatever it would have been after taxes). Only have to hold it for a year; could keep it on the market all year under the condition they close no earlier than x-date. Even without being able to lease to multiple tenants, surely some family would pay around $1,200 / month to live there and pay their own utilities - that would probably cover insurance and only leave them with property taxes.

I maintain that had they approached this from an investment standpoint rather than moving in, they would have banked.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Mike Orren, verified:

The AP sent out a reporter and a photog who stayed almost as long as I did. Wonder what the "cost" of that was:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedconte...

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Alex Bentley, staff:

Mike, think you may have a problem with that audio -- sounds like the Chipmunks on speed.

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Mike Orren, verified:

Sounds OK on my machine?

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Mike Orren, verified:

For those having chipmunk audio problems, here's the raw file:

http://media.pegasusnews.com/mp3/Misc...

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Mike Orren, verified:

The things you learn from referrer logs:

There are apparently homeowners on Lake Tyler who do own their land, but all of the older developments are like this one:

http://boards.hgtv.com/eve/forums/a/t...

Also, now-former homeowner Don Cruz has his own website here:

http://www.doncruz.net/

5 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

DigitalHiccup, anonymous:

Sadly, once again HGTV reaps in all the awards and money on the monstrocity Dream home from hell that no one can keep and the poor winner has to suffer the tax extremes and other costs HGTV heaped on the winner.

You would think that HGTV would build a Nice comfortable AFORDABLE home, on purchased property with reasonable furnishings.

The fact that all these suppliers donate the most expensive furnishings and kitchen appliances, etc to get advertising from HGTV is a ruse to the contest and a false glimpse of what a winner would receive. Oh, the winner will receive it alright!! Hope they are not bending over when HGTV hands over the keys because the term FANTASY fits the sweepstakes to a "T".

When will HGTV learn,? They never will! They are making too much money from the donations and the fans and the commercial interests. None of which benefit the Winner of the dream house.

It is a farce in the worse way.

Dean

3 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

tsole2, anonymous:

hgtv comes out a winner in all this mess, read behind the story!!!!!!!!!!

3 years, 4 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

shldtn647, anonymous:

Agree with comments on managing the property. Get something free and people do not know how to manage it. Make them pay and they will find a way.
Right, if you see you cannot afford the taxes, upkeep, etc. sell it right away and buy a cheaper home. Are people really this stupid? Even people on The Price Is Right sell something, if they can't pay the gift taxes........... No tears from me

3 years, 3 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

roger_hutchison, anonymous:

I believe HGTV should prequalify anyone winning these beautiful homes prior to awarding the actual prize. This could easily be made a part of the contest rules and would promote a better image for the program. The sweepstakes is a brilliant marketing concept and would seem to be attractive to a wider viewing audience if there were more winners that could actually afford to live in, maintain and keep their prize. Respectfully Submitted, Roger Hutchison

2 years, 11 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

beatricegordon, anonymous:

SEVERAL MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY ENTER THIS DREAM HOME GIVE AWAY EVERY YEAR ALTHOUGH WE ALL HAVE NO INTENTION OF MOVING THERE TO LIVE. WE ALL UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MEARLY AN OPPORTUNITY AND NOT A FREEBEE. OF COURSE IT WOULD HAVE TO BE SOLD. VISIT IT SELL IT AND COME AWAY WITH A LITTLE BIT OF MONEY FROM YOUR WINNINGS. SAY LA VE

2 years, 6 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

jlschenkkan, anonymous:

Yes, c'est la vie! There has to be a better way - I doubt that any of the houses really appraise for the amount HGTV assigns to the house. Surely the taxes reflect the real value, not the hyped-up one. That being said, property taxes and upkeep would prevent all but the richest winners from keeping the house, anyway.

1 year, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

cjmoore751, anonymous:

This is a common problem with getting "something for nothing" just like the extreme home makeover recipients, many of them have lost their homes due to formidable high taxes, operating expenses, etc... and the really sad thing is they loss the land that it was on which is usually theirs to begin with. These giveaways should include taxes, and insurance paid by the generous sponsors of these giveaways. That might make it truely a gift.

1 year, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

 Find out how to share this comment with Facebook

See more stories in:


Faved or commented on by...

Related events

Latest comments...

Former Dogfish Head brewer will take reins as Deep Ellum's brewmaster

Scott, that's on me. You are right, and thanks for the correction.


Check out this Texas A&M yell leader Ken doll

Wow, a KenĀ® doll that is both missing genitalia AND anatomically correct!


Check out this Texas A&M yell leader Ken doll

"Rally round, Aggies! KenĀ® doll joins the Texas A&M cheer squad in a white jumpsuit and red athletic


Stay connected