Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Dallas City Council to try to ban smoking in bars
Email
|
Print
|
Tell us your story
|
Comments (39)
|
Drinking and smoking will no longer be kissing cousins, at least in public, if the Dallas City Council has their way. Legislation to ban smoking in bars is likely to be put before the council by August, and if approved, could go into effect by the end of the year.
Mayor Tom Leppert, Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Dwaine Caraway, and Council Members Pauline Medrano and Ron Natinsky are quoted as being in favor of the ban. One possible piece of good news for smokers is that those who support the ban aren't sure yet if they will include pool halls, tobacco shops, cigar bars and hookah lounges in the legislation.
Posted by Alex B.
Related stories
- Proposed Dallas smoking ban a sticky issue for gay bars (Aug. 15, 2008)
See more stories in:
Find...
Today
The Trains at NorthPark Oh, no! Godzilla got into the Northpark train exhibit! But don't worry, the engineers will have it back up and running in time for your mall visit. And now, BEFORE the big holiday rush, is the best time to see them, before hundreds of drooling children take over the enclosure after Thanksgiving. More info
Blogs
- Merry KKKhristmas
Square Pegs - The Ethicist visits the Barnett Shale
Square Pegs - A holiday gift for your election-enthused loved ones
Square Pegs
Latest comments
- RussJFK on African American Legal Association responds to Hispanic community leader's racial comments: American_Patriot, I have met with Bill Clinton before and we did not have to discuss this irrational...
- Jason Rice on African American Legal Association responds to Hispanic community leader's racial comments: ch0 it was a tough room and you had a hard warmup act. The “Valhalla” line woulda worked on a two be...
- RussJFK on African American Legal Association responds to Hispanic community leader's racial comments: CHO—Me too man, I got too excited, angry. Gosh this blogging, commenting gets to be “too much” some...
- ch0 on African American Legal Association responds to Hispanic community leader's racial comments: Twas merely an apparently misguided attempt at “the humor”, Mr. Russ. I offer no real explanation fo...
Latest reviews
- SportingNewsGrill on Sporting News Grill (Arlington): great food good service. Drink specials Great!!...
- djyosh on ROCC: I was there this past Friday for a late happy hour, it was great. They had a jazz band that provided...
- Joel Woiton on Twisted Root Burger Company: I visited this place this past weekend. I had the mushroom swiss burger and it was pretty good. My o...


Comments
xdavidwattsx Anonymous
Do it, do it, do it, do it, do it!
Other cities, states and entire countries have gone down this road with success.
5 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
James Scott Verified
I think it's obvious there would have to be a provision for hookah lounges (assuming, you want any hookah lounges to stay in business), but isn't "pool hall" a little generic? What exactly constitutes a "pool hall"?
5 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
snowboard9 Anonymous
Make it happen. It's a verifiable health hazard. Quit listening to businesses that cater to nicotine addicts. What do expect them to say? What is Dallas waiting for? Good grief.
These days you can't even eat at outdoor cafe's without a smoke cloud nearby. I'd get rid of that privilege too if it was up to me. Perhaps outdoor smoking when it's over 90deg or below 60deg. That's fair, right?
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Pavel Lishin Verified
I don't believe this will happen, and I won't cry when I see someone light up in a bar. But it would be nice coming home and not smelling like grandma's ashtray. :(
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Tracy Yost Verified
Hiya all,
There is no logic in defense of banning smoking in bars, that when followed to all of it's natural conclusions, does not also lead to banning sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places, banning McDonald's, Krispy Kreme AND Starbuck's, television,automobiles...
There has to be a line drawn somewhere, to separate "what we want our city council to protect us from", from "what we would rather decide for ourselves, thank you very much".
I'm told that this "legally" comes down to mostly a right to work issue - that is, a person should be able to acquire and enjoy a job at any place that "hires people", without health hazards. But the legal reality is that there are distinct criteria for determining "job discrimination" and smoking status is not one of them. Neither is there a category for "alcohol consumer".
There are a handful of companies now that will not hire people who are smokers (and it would also legal for them to refuse to hire non-smokers). What do you think would happen if those same companies decided they would refuse to hire alcohol consumers ? (well besides that would be bad if they were a charter bus company ...) ... I'm pretty sure that idea would fly like a pig.
My points are these:
1) what we know from prohibition is that not only can we not prohibit it, we need to give the alcohol consumers a place to consume in the aggregate, i.e. a tavern.
2) the same logic applies to tobacco consumers.
3) smokers and non-smoker's alike deserve to be able to spend their discretionary time in places that allow or disallow smoking. (as per current ordinance).
4) I love northern CA, but would much rather see a good blues show in north Texas.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Pavel Lishin Verified
Tracy - I don't think that banning fatty foods is a natural consequence. Me scarfing down a burger doesn't harm your health. (Alcohol might, if I decide to drive drunk and run you off the road, though.)
In regard to your points - the prohibition is not an apt comparison. They're not banning cigarettes altogether - only smoking in bars.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
ch0 Anonymous
Smoking in bars is cool.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Tracy Yost Verified
wow u totally didn't get it Pavel.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
DC Anonymous
We're getting to the pot - kettle level interaction, here.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
So DC, what's your wager on how many pool tables an establishment must have before it can be considered a pool hall?
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Rick Yost Verified
The point that you folks don't understand (obviously) is that when I smoke a cigarette in my bar, you are not affected at all.
You are only affected if you come to my bar. (are you still with me or should I slow down?) You have the choice to go wherever you want to go- you don't have to come to my bar- where we smoke. You don't have to be around cigarette smoke at all if you don't want to be. (are you still with me?)
However, even though you know you don't ever- EVER have to come to my bar- where we smoke- it still irritates the sh*t out of you that we still do it here. So you just can't help but penalize us- because you can.
Should I say that again- you never have to come to our establishment- but you still don't want us to be able to make the choice to smoke. How selfish is that?
What gives you the right to say what I can, or can't do in my own business?
YOU NEVER HAVE TO EVER SET FOOT IN OUR PLACE AND YOU STILL ARE DETERMINED TO MAKE US DO WHAT YOU WANT US TO. (yes, this time I was yelling)
Because you refuse or ignore your right to make a choice- you're depriving me of my right to make a choice. Amen!
Thanks for the memories folks, the memory of freedom I used to have of living in this society. Thanks for nothing!
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Jason Rice Verified
I think we should also tell Rick what to wear. He seems to long for that kind of "guidance."
Hey - I hate smelling like smoke. I don't hang at bars generally. But people - where does this "good for you" crap end? Right at YOUR doorstep.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
I never need to ride in your car either, but you still can't drive as fast as you want to.
I never need to go on your property, but you still can't dump oil all over the ground.
You never needed to open a bar!
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
How 'bout them Cowboys?
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
xdavidwattsx Anonymous
I think what's lost in translation here is that because smokers are too lazy to walk 5 feet out the door of the establishment they'd just rather non-smokers not even patronize their establishment. Seems pretty logical. Then again, when were smokers ever logical?
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Rick Yost Verified
Sorry folks, I had to vent. Didn't mean to bring the thread down with so much common sense. "My bad!" However, no one's come up with an intelligent counter to my post. You won't!
Our bar won't fold because of a smoking ban. We Yosts are survivors.
It's all a matter of principle to me. Remember principles? Before the era of Enron, Iraq, and Katrina, they used to be a big deal in America. They still are to me.
Peace
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
xdavidwattsx Anonymous
How bout this for principle:
I'd like to be able to have a beer or see a show, in a bar or club, without increasing my odds of dying from lung cancer.
Really crazy, I know.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
snowboard9 Anonymous
Yost, better to have given you last input as a courtesy to a losing argument but I like your spunk! Even though you appear to be be judging your own 'intelligent post contest' I submit the following:
Smoking is a verifiable health hazard for public places. Regulation of public places is a part of 'living in the big city' as it were. Regulators are doing there part.
I also support handicap access for businesses. Granted they can wheel themselves to a 'handicap friendly' places only but it's better the other way around.
I would agree, however, that society is exerting it's preference for a more healthful quality of life. If it's any consolation, you guys can smoke and pollute the air in all the outdoor areas - a bummer for us in the spring and fall. However, don't get too comfy with that loophole either. :-)
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
Believe me, snowboard9, you're wasting your keystrokes.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
momzilla Anonymous
Personally, I worry more about nasty people who don't wash their hands after using the toilet. Smoke I can easily avoid by not going to places where it is permitted. But it is impossible to tell when I touch that doorknob if the last person who touched it transferred a virus or bacteria. And handshakes? Forget it! When are we going to start enforcing handwashing? We can have a whole city bureaucracy and undercover agents photographing perpetrators and issuing fines in public rest rooms.
It's in the interest of public health, y'all!
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
momzilla Anonymous
Come to think of it, while we're being healthy and all, let's ban children under, say, six from all public swimming areas. Good grief. I shouldn't have to swim in other people's kids' excrement.
Oh, and 80s music in public places and while waiting in a telephone queue ... just because it makes me sick.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
xdavidwattsx Anonymous
I'd be content just to ban children altogether.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Jason Rice Verified
Dang it X*X! You're gonna wipe out my lawn service. I finally got the lower middle class to buy in here with mediocre education , but if you reduce the supply, it won't drive the price of unskilled labor down and my plans of affordable retirement - though short of world domination - will be foiled.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
momzilla Anonymous
I don't think we need to go that far. A leash law for the ones who aren't demonstrably obedienced trained wouldn't go amiss ... especially in Walmart today.
3 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
What's next?
Someone telling smokers they can't litter all over the place where ever their whimsies compel them??!?!?!
I would be content with smokers and their filthy behaviors being driven into underground smoke easies, as someone had mentioned around here.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
I'd be content if they got this bitch over with and made a decision: To ban, or not to ban.
Doyle's patience is dwindling at an increasing rate. Won't someone PLEASE think of the horsie. =(
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Jason Rice Verified
Dead horses only got one use, son.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
ch0 Anonymous
We should ban you freedom-hating pinko libs from America! This great nation under God was founded on smokin tobaccy!
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
ch0 Anonymous
We should ban you freedom-hating pinko libs from America! This great nation under God was founded on smokin tobaccy!
And don't forget the slaves growing it. I can't believe liberal government got in my business and said I can't do what I want to with MY slaves!
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Kevin Kunreuther Verified
Foists daze banns toe-bakky, nekst daze banns de al-key-hole, nekst daze banns sir-tanz lifes muse ick. Wisht we cudz banns daze wunz doo-in de banns in de foist playst.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Rick Yost Verified
I'm going to regret this but... XdavidX- "I'd like to be able to have a beer or see a show, in a bar or club, without increasing my odds of dying from lung cancer."
Then go do it dude! There's a thousand smoke-free places available to you.
Momzilla- "Smoke I can easily avoid by not going to places where it is permitted." One of the only intelligent things posted here. Thank you.
Clay213- "I would be content with smokers and their filthy behaviors being driven into underground smoke easies, as someone had mentioned around here." So would you frequent these 'smoke-easies'? Is that kinda like a 'speak-easy'- kinda like...a bar?
I love your posts man, they're always so whimsical.
One of these days you folks are going to lose the right to do something you care about.
I'm grinning now in anticipation.
I'm done.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
Cue 'I don't care about anything comments'
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
Whimsical or psychopathic? I'm going to have to take up Doyles "You're dead to me." approach.
Rick - It's your place, you pay the bills. No question you should be the one making the rules. Just like your home.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
jtmbls: Please keep running your mouth.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
DC Anonymous
So, this thread has had pretty much the same run as all the others. Blah blah why is it I cannot spray compressed CO into your face, but it's ok if it comes out of a stick, etc etc etc, because then we'll have to ban flashlights and the terrorists win!
I love how the smoking contingent tries to pull the 'smoking ban is going to cost you your civil liberties' argument, but it's not like we've seen "Smokers Against the Patriot Act" or "Smokers Unite To Oppose Government Wire Tap Program." Convenient hypocrisy.
Cutting out the smoke could make Dallas a nicer place to be, but you can't reason with an addict.
Aaaannd now, for the coveted last word of the thread award: nominations?
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
Oh and by the way Rick and Tracy - I've sent out the evite for the upcoming Shawn Pittman show (so excited!) and will be bringing a big group, none of whom will try to tell you how to run your business. I can't wait to meet you both!
Clay213 - Please walk into a busy intersection. Dead to me.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
xdavidwattsx Anonymous
DC, you can't reason with any sucker willing to spend 5 bucks a day to actually shorten their lives (and stink). Perhaps that's why 80% of the US decided it was pretty stupid to smoke and that their time, effort and money was better spent elsewhere.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Pavel Lishin Verified
DC - I think the problem is that we keep appealing to platonic ideals, which have no place in the world. Rick and Tracy (to name the most vocal opponents) are speaking of the right to self-determination, pursuit of happiness, etc., without being oppressed by the government. Myself and others are talking about the government doing it's job - namely, protecting its citizens from harm. Take their viewpoint to the illogical extreme, and you've got drunk drivers dumping gasoline into rivers. Take my viewpoint to the extreme, and you have a nation of citizens locked up in padded rooms with a tiny window overlooking a drawing of a happy sun.
But none of us want the philosophies we're invoking to be carried anywhere near that far, so let's all quit clinging to them like bloody steak salesmen to a raft in shark infested waters.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
Ahhh…There’s that logic thing again…Pavel, you give mohawks a good name.
3 months ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Post a comment
(Requires free PegasusNews.com account.)