Jump to: site navigation, content.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Theater Review: Losing Daniel

Email Print Tell us your story Comments (11)

Losing Daniel

  • When: Saturday, Oct. 18, 2008, 8 p.m.
  • Where: Art Centre of Plano, 1039 East 15th Street, Plano
  • Cost: $15
  • Age limit: Not available

Losing Daniel is a world premiere of a local playwright opening this week in Plano. The plot revolves around a “rediscovered” play of an internationally famous author whose influence is so great that even 20 years after leaving New York, he has enough pull to control the casting of a specific lead on Broadway to fill his hero’s role. The actor cast locally just happens to be fresh off the farm in Texas and resembles to a tee the role’s namesake, Daniel, the dead son of the playwright lost in a car crash at age seventeen. Yes exactly the age of the chosen green actor. If at first this seems a bit pat and a far stretch, the premise provided is the playwright’s own obsession with Providence and second chances.

Before going further, I should clarify that I am a friend of the playwright and therefore have a much longer familiarity with the text and a bias to see it succeed. That confessed, it doesn’t in this production. Fortunately, the audience was composed primarily of people like me, friends of the author who were there “to see a good show” and that can make for a good time and forgive a myriad of sins.

The set designed by director John Mallory Land gives a nice first impression, filling the space obliquely with warm modern blonde wood but contradicted by the dark heavy furnishings that you wouldd expect in a “Southwestern” Colorado mountainside retreat. It has everything you think you need for a set: levels, three distinct acting areas and a nice cozy fireplace front and center stage. That said, had it not stated the director designed it, the use of it would lead me to believe the set designer never even met the director. One single exit forces interminable scene changes and entire costume changes occur right onstage. The only option was full cast exeunt the one door stage left, all change and file back in.

Opening night was a bad night for tech overall with a cued cell phone ringing and ringing through the exposition – ignored by the cast so we know it’s a gaff. Then when the action stops and people start looking at each other…. Finally a cell phone call comes in and the phone is answered to the sound of a bird squawking. Let’s just say that pretty much set the tone for slow and misplaced sounds and lights throughout – yes, the bird reappears at the most dramatically awful times, like preceding a first kiss.

So at least we can look at a good promising cast. The playwright is played by local veteran Ray Gestaut, his wife by venerable local mainstay Juli Erikson, and our budding young acting sensation by a rising star from Collin College, Chad Halbrook. The cast is filled out with “the agent from Broadway” tasked with producing this new classic played by Nicole Metcalf and her assistant/niece and the actor’s love interest played by Elizabeth Robinson. Juli Erikson delivers the most watchable performance. It’s a daunting role and she does well enough with it. The size difference between petite Ms. Erikson and towering Gestaut is just worsened by horrible misuse of the levels of the set and pedestrian blocking. While much of the stress of the exposition lay in the need for the drawling Texas beginner to convince that he can lose the accent, the half of the cast twanged like a Fredricksburg banjo --- not seasoned New Yorkers. Finally, an injury that brings the actor back to Colorado to recuperate and learn playwriting at the master’s hand is so poorly physicallized by young Mr. Halbrook that it becomes comic: “limping” with a deliberation that was painful to watch. Overall the acting was uneven, made worse by the immediate convention that all important and emotional lines were delivered “Out the Window” directly to the audience in a five foot swath of downstage that was also supposed to be a towering flagstone fireplace. When they weren’t being “dramatic at the fireplace/window”, the stage business of “hand games” to make the playwright and actor seem “buddies” was downright childish.

On the up side, lighting designed by Plano Stages resident whiz kid Jason Fehrm is frankly the best I’ve seen in the space in over 15 years. Good solid work, save the one shaky follow spot used to suggest an out of town location for a phone call from New York.

As I said, I had definite need to like this production, and while I enjoyed moments of Juli Erikson’s performance, the bulk of the production, while acted against a beautiful if impractical set, was overreaching and uneven – and technically underprepared, with a run time of 134 minutes.

Losing Daniel, produced by Teatro delle Muse, runs through October 26 at the ArtCentre Theatre. Purchase tickets online or by calling 972-424-MUSE.

Jason Rice is a local theater director and producer and a founder of Bucket Productions in Dallas and Rover Dramawerks in Plano – and an avid PegasusNews fanatic.


Related stories


See more stories in:

Comments

FinalWord Anonymous

One must wonder why a critic who refers to himself as a "friend of the playwright" doesn't even bother to mention the playwright's name when writing a review.

Truth be told, Jason Wright's feelings are hurt. He feels slighted because his writer's group, "Write Around Here" wasn't mentioned in the program for Losing Daniel.

Like the four year old who throws a fit when he doesn't get his way, Mr. Wright's (or perhaps I should say "the critic's") tantrum takes the form of a vicious review that, in no way, represents that which he seeks to critique.

I'm not sure what play he attended Friday night, but I do know it's not the one he reviewed. Had it been, his review would have reflected the truly moving, well-acted, and artfully crafted dramatic piece that I, and everyone in the theater with the exception of Mr. Rice, thoroughly enjoyed.

As the saying goes, "those who can't do, teach." And those who can't write become critical of those who can. And that's the Final Word.

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

Travis Bush Verified

Jason Wright and Jason Rice are the same person?

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

FinalWord Anonymous

Yes. In the same way he fails to mention the playwright's name, so to do I fail to mention "the critic's" name correctly (i.e., when I mention is it at all).

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

Mark-Brian Sonna Verified

I am one of the reviewers for Pegasus. I was going to review this play, but I was unable to due to some other commitments.

I can see the predicament Mr. Rice found himself by simply reading his review and knowing that he was friends with Lon Rogers the playwright. I've faced this too quite a bit.

I agree that he failed to mention the playwrights name and it is important, but to me it reads as an oversight versus as an intentional act/bias. This said, because the theatre community is so small I as a critic have found myself in the unenviable position of having to give a negative review or mixed review to a fellow collegue. Or on the other end of the spectrum I give glowing review to a collegue. Regardless of my affiliation, my good review or bad review will get critiqued as being biased because I know the person. By now it seems there are fewer people I don't know in the theatre community then I do know. So what to do? Give your honest opinions, mention your possible bias so the reader can be aware, and be as objective as possible. In these three areas, from reading this review Mr. Rice's review succeeds. Why? In most of his objections he is very detailed, he mentions specific things.

I know Mr. Rice and consider him a friend, but the one thing I can say about him is he is honest in his opinions, ther isn't a malicious bone in his body. I know he's heaped praise on me in the past, but he has also pointed out flaws. I didn't always agree (though I did at times, darn it!) with his "negative critiques". I also know from personal experience that his opinions were sincere, honest and well expressed. If I'm going to take the good praise, I must take the negative.

Even though this review isn't overall positive. I am much more intrigued in seeing this play based off of this review, AND the susbsequent comment listed.

Whenever I see responses I am always curious to know the relatioship of the writer to the production: an audience member? Involved with the theatre? friend of the Playwright? First time theatre patron? Regular? I also love reading a detailed counterpoint to the review: why something specific worked or didn't work, etc.

Mark-Brian Sonna

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

Travis Bush Verified

"In the same way he fails to mention the playwright's name, so to do I fail to mention "the critic's" name correctly"

Like the four year old who fell off the short bus?

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

ThatPorterGuy Anonymous

One must wonder why FinalWord feels free to criticize Mr. Rice's criticism so intimately while hiding in the shadows. At least Mr. Rice had the courage to sign his name to his words. You apparently do not.

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

ThatPorterGuy Anonymous

..and not wanting to be accused (rightfully so) of sniping from the shadows myself.

Joe Porter

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

jtmbls Anonymous

Perhaps Jason subconsciously didn’t want to put his “friends” name on a less than glowing review. I think I might be thanking him.

Well done Jason and no easy task, I am sure. I found your review to be both thoughtful and thorough. And the good news is that there didn’t seem to be much that couldn’t be worked out by the end of the run, no?

So, quit with the sour grapes and get back to work! Geez, you theater people are sooo dramatic! ; -)

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

Carol Rice Verified

Maybe Jason's omission of Lon's name in the review was just a reflection of the playwright's missing bio in the play's program. One would think with all the other people TDM thanked, coupled with nearly two pages of rambling from the company's artistic director, that they'd have room for a bio from the LOCAL playwright whose work they were debuting. Maybe there's a pattern there....

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

EnterStageLeft Anonymous

Perhaps Jason (and others) are rightly offended because Teatro delle Muse feels the need to state on their website: 'Teatro delle Muse has no connection or affiliation with a local “writers symposium” known as Write Around Here. Productions undertaken by Teatro delle Muse are selected independently of that organization'

1 year ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )

Post a comment

(Requires free PegasusNews.com account.)


(Forgotten your password?)

:

:

Today

Candlelight Vigil for Soldiers at Fort Hood Just a day before Veteran's Day, UT-Arlington students remember the soldiers wounded and killed at Fort Hood on Thursday. The public is invited to share this somber event with students. More info

Latest comments

See more recent comments

Latest reviews

See more recent reviews


Quantcast