Tuesday, September 16, 2008 , Updated
Arlington to vote Tuesday on turning methane into cold hard cash
The City of Arlington already has a system in place that captures the methane gas from its landfills and channels it to help power the Village Creek Wastewater Treatment plant. This means the city has been earning "carbon credits," which in turn can be sold on the Chicago Climate Exchange to companies that can't meet clean air goals. The city will vote today on whether to enter a contract with Element Markets, who will sell their carbon credits for them on the exchange. Basically, Arlington is selling their cleaner air to companies that either suck at or don't want to deal with pollution control.
Posted by Laura S.
Email
|
Print
|
20 Comments
|
Contribute
|
- »UT Arlington assists in world's largest scientific experiment
- »UT Arlington physicists research, explain development of oxygen
- »Landscape Architecture at UT Arlington ranked in top 20 nationally
- »North Texas students save money and escape paperback extinction with textbook renting
- »Cowboys Stadium and city of Arlington break record for largest CPR event
-
»TxDOT hosts event to entice small, minority, and women-owned businesses toward Arlington road projects
-
»City of Arlington will use Cowboys Stadium for world-record CPR training attempt
-
»Arlington council member to chair Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition
-
»News of Fort Worth sewer overflow reported by Arlington officials
-
»City of Arlington schedules public meeting to discuss Bowman Springs Road project
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
a deal
|
a pet
|

Dallas Spohn, says:
Hey, I just bought a hotel on Pennsylvania Ave. Can I pass go and collect $200? The carbon footprint is a load of hohaha. Unless you explain it to me better than the Al Gores of the world can.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Chris Kidd, says:
When I first read the headline, I thought they were going to crush some meth labs and create energy from that....Probably more than Spohn has done, as he also likely prone to tossing out lit cig butts on the highway and kicking puppies in his freetime ;)
Seriously, at least Arlington is taking a forward step in preserving the environment. Footprinting is a very real thing and quite frankly, we shoulld all take notice.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
I really enjoy kicking puppies. May not toss cig butts out the window. But I do enjoy a good puppy kicking :) I can see your reasoning to taking the piss out of me but chrisdanger, can you even explain to me what the carbon footprint is? or are you just jumping on the band wagon because that’s the "cool" thing to do? look, I have no problem with Arlington doing something environmentally friendly. But, I think there are other things they can do that is more worth while. I am on the fence about the carbon footprinting thing. I can be swayed if you explain it to me. now I am off to kick more puppies.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Chris Kidd, says:
Spohn, yes I do : A carbon footprint is a measure of the impact human activities have on the environment in terms of the amount of greenhouse gases produced, measured in units of carbon dioxide.
I never really have been one to be a cool kid, always did my own thing. I also agree theres bigger things arlington, heck this whole area, can do to make it a more healthy place to live. For one, im a huge proponant of making our skies around here cleaner, esp. in the downtown areas. One way is to reduce the amount of vehicles allowed in the city centers and areas around. One thing we should try is a congestion tax, which has been done successfully elsewhere. Its been proven to lower carbon emissions, as well as making the cities it has been implemented in better places to live.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
jtmbls, says:
Oh the money that is going to be made from all this hype. The day I start emitting more greenhouse gases than a cow is the day I will start paying someone to plant trees somewhere to make up for my existence.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
xdavidwattsx, says:
Let's not confuse a carbon footprint with trading or buying carbon credits. We all have a carbon footprint - or energy impact on the earth - if you will. I think that is very real and very legitimate for us to be concerned with.
That said, trading credits on a market seems to be nothing more than a shell game. I think buying and selling credits are a colossal waste of money and I don't see how they are a legitimately impacting energy consumption.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
jtmbls, says:
Who's confused? One has to know what their carbon footprint is before they can calculate how many credits they have or owe. Or do we just guess?
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
Ok, so it's an individual human existence that is measured, If I buy a polluting paper mill, does that add my personal footprint or a collective footprint? And I would like to know who spent money to do the research to come up with this? It’s not something I would choose to spend my hard earned money on. I would like to know who did though. Testing how much my fart would pollute the world. What, with project earth increasing phytoplankton in our oceans to filter more carbon dioxide than ever before. Does things like this counter the carbon footprint or is that kind of stuff not factored into the equation? because it doesn’t create that much of a national scare as global warming? And the facts that this yokel looks at is, It hasn’t been this cold in Sept since the early 1900’s How many times have we had an ice age on this planet? 3? 4? The planet changes like the tides in the ocean.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
xdavidwattsx, says:
I think you just combined 35 semi-related topics into one.
For the sake of not opening up a huge can of worms, the idea is (at is simplest core) to analyze how much energy you consume and try to reduce it. It's not too hard to figure out that out. You can tangibly measure how much gas you use, electricity you consume, how much plastic you buy and recycle. You also have a fair idea of where that energy came from.
While it can get more complicated than that, them's the basics.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
So, turn off a light once in a while, don't waste stuff, put your recyclables in the recycle bin. Don't drive when you can walk. I thought we were already doing stuff like that? why complicate it? And no, you can not get an accurate measure of it. Maybe a household tally would be close to accurate. Maybe a controlled city, but a nation? the world? You going to tell me you know exactly the amount of pollution that china is producing? south America?
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
xdavidwattsx, says:
If everyone was minding their energy impact then we wouldn't be talking about it.
People still buy Hummers, still drive when they can walk, still don't properly inflate their tires, still leave lights on, still try to cool their house to 72 in the summer, still buy too much bottled water, still use plastic grocery bags, and many still don't know what a CFL bulb is.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
jtmbls, says:
Oh but don't leave out the part where you can send money to an organization to offset your footprint. They will plant trees in some part of the world you will probably never see and all sorts of other things to make up for you being such a gluttonous American slob.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
exactly, they are not.. So how can you put a value on something that you can not measure world wide (you would need a world wide control measurement to start from)? jtmbls has it right... it's a guess. So don't spin out of it. like I said before, I am on the fence about this subject. Explain to me how it works.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
thats sweet jtmbls. do you get little pictures in the mail to tell you how well your tree is growing up? I smell a gimmick that I could possibly get into. If there are really that many guilty feeling suckers, then I can be a very rich man before I die. I'll have to get lessons from my moms on how to perfect the "guilt trip" first.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Chris Kidd, says:
Im of the belief we're all responsible for our planet. I myself quit driving recently and ride my bike to work. In ddition, I also started using CFLs in my lights sometime ago and cranked up my AC to 78-80 degrees while I was at work during the summer, which has saved me a decent amount of cash on my electric bills.
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
luniz, says:
you already said it Spohn, the idea is to correlate carbon credits units of carbon dioxide directly into dollars. Otherwise there's not any way to encourage corporations to reduce emissions. Corporations exist solely to return dollars on dollars invested, there's no reason to expect them to do anything to reduce carbon emissions unless they can either make or save money doing so. If you believe reducing carbon emissions to be a worthwhile goal, you necessarily believe in "monetizing" them (unless you're opposed to the existence of corporations in the first place).
You don't need a "world wide control measurement"...it's valuing the carbon produced or removed, I don't know the details of how they do that, I suppose it would be interesting to know.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
xdavidwattsx, says:
"So don't spin out of it. like I said before, I am on the fence about this subject. Explain to me how it works. "
Spin out of what? I'm not spinning anything. My point is simply that people should be cognizant of their energy usage and it's relatively easy to reduce it yourself without spending money on energy credits.
I'm not trying to be responsible for some guy in China. I'm trying to be responsible for my usage here in Texas. That's all I can measure and control.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
I don't think you can govern what a company can emit in their emissions. Since it takes different processes to produce different products or services. If you reduce their emissions then you reduce their productivity which reduces their profit. If they can not reduce their emissions then they have to pay which also reduces their profit. Or it’s not fair. I don't have a problem with the free market idea of carbon credits. But some companies emit more than others to produce goods that we all use. It's not regulated. last time I checked, there are things like trees and algae and the things that naturally convert co2 back to o2. There is a stat I read that 95% of carbon emissions occur naturally. Given this was in 2000-02 or around there. I agree that people should conserve energy, look for cleaner energy, that’s common sense. But how, in a logical mind can you give a value to something that can not be accurately adjusted? Then have the nerve to profit from it?
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Dallas Spohn, says:
wanted to add a thanks to luniz for making the most sense to me. But also adding, who is it that put a value on carbon produced or removed?
Verified
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
xdavidwattsx, says:
"I don't think you can govern what a company can emit in their emissions. Since it takes different processes to produce different products or services. If you reduce their emissions then you reduce their productivity which reduces their profit."
The ability to make a profit shouldn't trump the ability to breath clean air. The government's role should be to regulate a middle ground that protects clean air and provides an opportunity for a company to profit.
Anonymous
1 year, 2 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal