Jump to: site navigation, content.

Local stuff that matters to you.
Did you know about Claud Hardrickplaying at brooklyn Jazz Cafe today?
News & events for
Thursday, December
10

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Study finds Dallas-Fort Worth women suffer disproportionately from poverty

Neiman Marcus was unavailable for comment.

— Women in the Dallas-Fort Worth region are more likely to live in poverty, less likely to own a home, more likely to earn less and less likely to get as far in their careers with equal education than their male peers, a new economic security study from the Dallas Women's Foundation finds.

Strange, considering just how many oil heiresses call Dallas home

Photo not provided by the Dallas Women's Foundation

Strange, considering just how many oil heiresses call Dallas home

The report, the Dallas Women's Foundation Economic Security Indicators, was compiled by the foundation from publicly available data to present an objective portrait of how women are faring in the Dallas-Fort Worth community. The study, which will be the first of its kind to be updated annually, reveals that women, particularly those heading households alone, struggle against a complex web of issues to make ends meet. A complete copy is available here.

"The Dallas Women's Foundation Economic Security Indicators reveal a deeply troubling picture of our region's women living in financial stress at a disproportionate and unacceptable rate. With women making up half our population and heading over a quarter of our households, our community as a whole can not afford to sit by and accept this as the status quo," said Becky Sykes, Dallas Women's Foundation Executive Director and co-founder.

Several themes emerged from the study:

Female-headed households are a substantial demographic segment with significant impact in our region.

-- There are 577,000 households led by women in Dallas-Fort Worth -- more than one quarter (28 percent) of the region's total. That is more households than there are in the cities of Dallas (441,632) and Arlington (128,386) combined.

-- In Dallas-Fort Worth, one out of every five households led by women -- about 128,000 total -- live below the poverty line. That is about as many households as are in the city of Arlington (128,386).

-- Female-headed households are three to four times more likely to live in poverty than households led by married couples and by men.

-- Only 36 percent of women participate in full-time, year-round jobs, which are most likely to open doors to higher wages, health insurance and group retirement plans. In contrast, 57 percent of men participate in full-time jobs.

Source: Dallas Women's Foundation



  • Staff
  • Verified User
  • Anonymous

Pavel Lishin, says:

What's the definition of poverty line again?

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Erin Rice, says:

Pavel, also known as the poverty threshold, the poverty line is, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_line">the minimum level</a> of income deemed necessary to achieve an adequate standard of living in a given country."

In order to define what the poverty line for a given country is, a number of factors are measured determining how much money it costs for a citizen to live a "tolerable" life. Things like cost of food, clothing, shelter, transportation, health care, insurance, etc. can be included. Different countries may measure a different set of factors, but those are the basics.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Scott Doyle, says:

was compiled by the foundation from publicly available data to present an objective portrait of how women are faring in the Dallas-Fort Worth community.

While there's no doubt in my mind that the Dallas Women's Foundation approached this objectively, how exactly do they determine a household to be female-headed?

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Erin Rice, says:

Census reports obtain that information, not to mention your tax form asks if you are filing as a head of household or not.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Pavel Lishin, says:

I know what <b>a</b> poverty threshold is; I was curious what it was for Dallas.

And I'm obviously too lazy to research.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Scott Doyle, says:

Erin, that's fantastic - I'm wondering how they specifically determined "female-headed household" for this study. Simply says they pulled public info...that leaves things pretty wide open, imo.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Erin Rice, says:

That's definitely not how your question was phrased, but to answer the implied question: the U.S. government defined the poverty threshold for 2007-08 as an income of $10,400 for a one-person household (higher for Alaska and Hawaii). For each additional person add $3,600.

In Dallas*, "14.9% of families and 17.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 25.1% of those under age 18 and 13.1% of those aged 65 or over."

In Fort Worth*, "12.7% of families and 15.9% of the population were below the poverty line, including 21.4% of those under age 18 and 11.7% of those age 65 or over."

*Obtained from Wikipedia, who obtained from the 2000 U.S. Census.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Erin Rice, says:

And, Scott, what I'm saying is it's highly likely that's where they pulled said information for this study. Of course, I can't say that with absolute, 100% certainty. I do know that "female-headed household" is a pretty standard term and the use of it in studies often falls along the same lines as those defined in the census reports and for tax purposes. But, perhaps it was just a little publicly obtained voodoo and witchcraft.

You guys asked questions, I'm just trying to help out. I don't have an agenda here.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Scott Doyle, says:

Stop brow-beating us with your man hate, Erin!

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Tracy Yost, says:

This study would be more meaningful if it were comparative, either to some other tx region, or other US cities..... Something a little more global, the US ranks 12th in the world (out of 177) on the United Nations gender equity development index (measures gender equality wrt life expectancy, education and earned income). Who's doing better ?
1 Iceland
2 Norway
3 Australia
4 Canada
5 Ireland
6 Sweden
7 Switzerland
8 Japan
9 Netherlands
10 France
11 Finland

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Pavel Lishin, says:

Erin, although it's easy (and usually correct) to assume that I'm retarded, I actually did know what a poverty line was. Thanks for finding the actual data, though. $10,000 a year seems so frighteningly low.

Verified

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

jtmbls, says:

No surprise here. Although, I honestly can’t remember the last time I participated in a Census. I vaguely recall someone coming to our home many years ago and then several years later, receiving the questionnaire in the mail. That was years ago and I haven’t seen one since. Another statistical depository could be the school districts.

What is shocking is this list Tracy found. Iceland, I get. They are probably so happy to see a woman they just give her whatever she wants to make her stay. But Japan beats us at gender equality? Ouch!

Anonymous

1 year, 2 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

Email Print 12 Comments Contribute

See more stories in:


Quantcast