Jump to: site navigation, content.

Content from our friends over at The Texas Tribune

Friday, December 11, 2009

Red light cameras in Texas catch more than 1 million drivers every year


The cameras have their fair share of critics, but police agencies and the insurance industry largely support them.

Jacob Villanueva/Texas Tribune

Jacob Villanueva/Texas Tribune

Next time you consider speeding through an intersection after the signal turns red, remember this: A camera might be watching.

As many as 1.2 million motorists are nabbed by red-light cameras across Texas each year, according to the latest data collected by state transportation officials.

Cameras first popped up a several years ago in Garland. Now more than 300 are trained on intersections in at least three dozen cities.

While some cities have lost money on the cameras in recent years, they've been lucrative for many others, generating, by a conservative estimate, as much as $60 million in fines. The cities share their profits — fines, less expenses — with the state, and spend the rest on traffic safety.

The Tribune did a statewide analysis and built a database application thanks to a state law, passed in 2007, that requires cities to report information about their cameras to the Texas Department of Transportation.

The agency recently published those documents on its website, allowing anyone to see the number of crashes and citations during a year-long period from 2008 to 2009 at each monitored intersection.

The cameras may be growing in popularity in some cities, but they also still spark controversy. Citizens recently voted to have them removed in College Station, for example, amid a grass-roots campaign claiming that they violate privacy rights and don't make motorists safer. There are plenty of critics elsewhere.

"My problem is down on a root level," said Paul Kubosh, a traffic lawyer in Houston who has fought the cameras in the courts and the Legislature. "They're lying to us. They know they're lying to us when they say the cameras make us safer."

But city officials, police agencies and the insurance industry largely support the cameras.

Duncanville Police Chief Robert Brown, whose city includes the intersection with the most tickets from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009, believes they make his intersections safer by raising awareness about signals.

"Obviously, there are going to be some people who are not in favor of the cameras," he said. "We made the decision to install the cameras because, at the end of the day, they make the community a safer place to travel."

The cameras typically catch motorists who cross the white line into an intersection after a light changes from yellow to red. They are mounted on poles before an intersection, not on the signals themselves, and take pictures and video footage from behind offending vehicles. State law requires that monitored intersections display signs warning drivers as they approach.

City officials in Houston say the cameras work effectively, with only a small percentage of false positives, or instances in which motorists get cited by accident. Occasionally, motorists are even cited twice. An example is if a motorist drives through a monitored intersection and causes a serious crash, receiving a traditional — and costlier — ticket from a police officer, and then later receives a camera ticket in the mail.

Most, if not all, cities require require employees to view and approve each violation before sending citations to motorists. Those who get cited can view video and pictures of their alleged violation, and they have the right to challenge the citation before an adjudication officer and, if requested, a municipal court judge. The tickets are civil violations, not criminal cases, so they don't affect a motorist driving record — and you can't be jailed for not paying.

In Houston, which has more cameras than any other Texas city, roughly 70 percent of people pay the tickets after the three-month deadline. Some motorists believe they were wronged — even if they weren't — but they just pay up anyway.

"I could have contested it," Don Cross, who received a citation from a Southwest Houston intersection. "There was a truck in front of me. I was actually through the light before it turned red."

Others just ignore their citations. (So far the city has been unsuccessful in blocking scofflaws' vehicle registrations, as the law allows, because Harris County officials have resisted the idea).

For every critic, supporters say, there are plenty of motorists fed up with red-light infractions. They just aren't as vocal in their support, said Russ Rader, spokesman for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a research group funded by auto insurance companies.

"There is this simmering controversy with red-light cameras," he said. "When you do actual public-opinion surveys, camera enforcement has a lot of support."

The Texas Tribune
Pegasus News Content partner - The Texas Tribune


Share: 
del.icio.us Digg DZone Facebook Fark Google Google Reader Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter YahooBuzz YahooMyWeb YCombinator


Sponsored Links

Scott Doyle, verified:

So are we hosed for at least another couple of years on this issue since our biannual legislature didn't get the sunset bill passed back in May/June?

iirc a lot of cities already renewed their contracts for fear of it, meaning this BS won't be gone for some time. imho anybody who thinks this isn't revenue driven needs to wake up.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

donaldson, anonymous:

OH IIHS, STUFF IT.

You know you are lying on the safety data anyhow. How many towns have been busted lying on safety stats so in the past month:

LA, CA Temple Terrace, FL Chicago, IL

People are fed up alright. WITH THE CAMERA SCAM!

Most of what RLC write have nothing to do with the plus 5 straight thru who cause the wrecks. They are right turns on red, stopping over the stop line, stopping before the stop line than pulling forward to stop again and under a second (which show the need for longer Amber times.

SO QUIT LYING TO THE READERS. The scameras will come down one day. There will be an accounting for all the questionable studies like TX DOT one (2008) and Houston one that irnoically contradicted one another!

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jason Rice, verified:

There will be an accounting for all the questionable studies

I'm with ScoDo - it IS about accounting... in the "Quickbooks" sense of the word.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Steve Thurman, verified:

Well, at this rate we'll all be eventually criminalized. Oh well. So what.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

macuser, anonymous:

www.gpsangel.com

red light camera detector. i picked up one from fry's last week.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jason Rice, verified:

OOOohhhh! Fight fire with fire......

and from a MAC user. There's a wakeup call to us geeks.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jesus Valadez, verified:

You could always just not run it.

Look, I just saved myself $100.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jason Rice, verified:

How embarrassingly low tech.

2 years, 5 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

 Find out how to share this comment with Facebook

See more stories in:


Faved or commented on by...

Latest comments...

UPDATED: Big Rich Texas' Pamela Martin-Duarte has prior felony conviction

Hey everyone - we gotta a buddy in Motor Town!!!


Dallas Morning News attacks ice cream trucks

Ridiculous volumes? Really? Jeez.

I hear the trucks at various parks in the Metroplex and they alw


Q-and-A: GCB isn't too far from real life in Highland Park

I was born and raised in Highland Park and while I knew that there were a lot of people with money,


Stay connected