Jump to: site navigation, content.

Local stuff that matters to you.
News & events for
Friday, December
4

Content from our friends over at Dallas Voice

Friday, January 9, 2009

Protests against Defense of Marriage Act set for Dallas and Denton

More than 1,000 people attended a Join the Impact rally at Dallas City Hall in November to protest the passage of California’s Proposition 8. This weekend, Join the Impact is holding coordinated rallies in state capitals around the country to call for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Laura McFerrin

More than 1,000 people attended a Join the Impact rally at Dallas City Hall in November to protest the passage of California’s Proposition 8. This weekend, Join the Impact is holding coordinated rallies in state capitals around the country to call for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act.

As he courted the LGBT community on the campaign trail, then-candidate Barack Obama said he opposed the federal Defense of Marriage Act — the legislation known as DOMA that prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriages and civil unions and allows states to refuse to allow such relationships legalized in other states.

Candidate Obama pledged to work for the full repeal of DOMA and for federal recognition of gay and lesbian relationships.

Now, 10 days before his inauguration, LGBT activists across the country will be coming together to demand President-elect Obama keep his promise.

Join the Impact, a direct-action LGBT rights group organized through the Internet in the wake of the passage of Proposition 8 in California on Nov. 4, has called for protests to take place in all 50 state capitals on Saturday, Jan. 10.

Join the Impact/Austin will be holding its Lone Star State gathering at 12:30 p.m. outside the Austin City Hall.

But the Dallas-based direct action group Queer Liberaction, believing that many North Texans would be unable to make the last-minute trip to Austin, decided to join the effort by staging a DOMA protest in Dallas on Saturday, too.

A second North Texas protest is also planned in Denton on Saturday.

Stonewall Democrats of Denton County and Peace Action Denton will gather on the Courthouse Square at 12:30 p.m. for the action there.

Queer Liberaction’s gathering takes place at 10:30 a.m. in the plaza behind the Dallas County Records Building, 501 Main St.

QL co-founder Gabe Coppinger said his group chose that location for the same reason the group decided to hold an event in Dallas on Saturday: “We think it is important for protests to be as visible as possible.”

Coppinger said the QL protest is likely to be at least a little bit more confrontational than some similar events. “We will have signs and we will have chants directly targeting Obama and demanding he keep his promise,” he said. “Many people think we shouldn’t be targeting him directly right now, because this [his inauguration] is such an historic time, blah blah blah. Lots of organizations say let’s wait, let’s put the gay issues on the backburner for now and let him get settled in the office and take care of issues like the economy first.

“But Queer Liberaction thinks this is an issue that should always be a top priority. There are plenty of frontburners, and we shouldn’t have to wait for our equality,” Coppinger said.

He said that the state of the economy is, in fact, one of the main reasons why LGBT people can’t afford to wait for DOMA to be repealed.

“If I lose my job, my partner can’t put me on his insurance. If he loses his job, I can’t put him on my insurance. This is a very big issue for us and for most gay couples. It’s not something we can wait for,” Coppinger said. “It’s important that we demand equality now and that we demand it directly from Obama because he is the one who promised us he would repeal this law.”

At its protests around the country, Join the Impact will be circulating copies of an “open letter” to the president-elect that will “remind [him] of the promises he made to us” and “serve as a pledge from our community that we will hold him to his promises and help him achieve them.” Organizers hope to get at least 1 million signatures and then deliver the letters to the White House.

Coppinger said Queer Liberaction will have copies of the letter at its event Saturday, too, as will those staging the event in Denton, according to organizer John McClelland.


Pegasus News content partner - Dallas Voice
The community newspaper for gay & lesbian Dallas.


  • Staff
  • Verified User
  • Anonymous

Pavel Lishin, says:

Hey, finally, a protest that the employed can attend!

Verified

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Scott Doyle, says:

More than 1,000 people attended a Join the Impact rally at Dallas City Hall in November

<a href="http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2008/sep/29/sarah-palin-dallas-visit-be-focus-protest/#c35972">I hear</a> protest counts may be subject to a decent amount of scrutiny in this town. =p

Verified

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

CitizenKane, says:

Americans overwhelmingly want to preseve the term Marriage as it means the union of a heterosexual couple, but also support full rights for the gay/lesbian community thru civil union legislation.

Why is it that extremists in the gay/lesbian community want to destroy the meaning of Marriage when they can achieve the same civil rights and protections under civil union legislation?

Anonymous

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

JW Richard, says:

Hey CitizenKane, just curious why you felt marriage needed a capital m.

Verified

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jason Rice, says:

CK - in my heart I'm with you (I can't tell ya why, it just "feels" wrong), but I keep running up against the silly logical question: "If it's functionally the same, why call it something different?"

Didn't "separate but equal" get us in enough excrement already?

Verified

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

CitizenKane, says:

It isn't a seperate but equal issue. Defense of Marriage just codifies into law what the world has all along presumed - Marriage is a heterosexual committment. Civil Union legislation will give the G+L community equal protection.

A more important question is why can't the G+L community be happy with laws codifying their civil rights under civil union legislation? It appears that extremists are more interested in destorying the meaning of marriage.

Anonymous

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Catbird, says:

My experience tells me that there are many people in the community who back this movment because they would become political persona non grata if they didn't.

It's all crap.

The universal adhesive that holds the GLBT experience in place isn't the struggle for marital love and fidelity at all. It's flat out hedonistic, taboo, sexual conduct that informs the white hot center and it always will be.

In my view, "marriage" of any kind kills the thrill.

Anonymous

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

JW Richard, says:

@Jason, it is indeed a "separate but equal" issue.

CK, you've gotta be careful with statements like, "why can't they be happy with..." in general, however especially in this case because such civil union legislation that would codify G/L civil rights hasn't been proposed, let alone passed, in most states. So it's hypothetical at best to assume that civil unions would actually be so codified state-to-state similarly to marriage.

Besides, terms like "marriage" and "spouse" are currently used and understood in existing laws and businesses (like for health benefits). In terms of having to then change laws and policies for a separate group of people, wouldn't it be more cost-efficient and less time consuming to simply, as you wrote, "de-story" the meaning of marriage to include G/L people?

Verified

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Pavel Lishin, says:

<i>A more important question is why can't the G+L community be happy with laws codifying their civil rights under civil union legislation?</i>

Why couldn't black people just be happy at the back of the bus? The view's just as good from back there.

Verified

10 months, 4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

CitizenKane, says:

Nice try, but a specious arguement.

Putting a definition to marriage isn't taking rights away, or assigning G+L to the "back of the bus" any more than defining what "Hispanic" means or "African American." Both of which are terminologies which are legally defined and used without taking away their civil rights and full and equal protection under the law.

Anonymous

10 months, 3 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

snowboard9, says:

If the government needs to be in the business of human relationships, then I'm all for civil unions as being it.

The condition is that marriage is an optional, religious ceremonial subset of civil unions.

Would you agree to that? GREAT! Let's push this bad boy through!

Anonymous

10 months, 3 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

jtmbls, says:

Why is it that extremists in the gay/lesbian community want to destroy the meaning of Marriage...?

I think it’s us heteros who have done that, not the G/L community. They want it, they can have it. And here’s hoping they do a far better job at it than us straight people have.

Anonymous

10 months, 3 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jason Rice, says:

Tumbles, I have to giggle at that with you. If the criticism of G/L relationships is a stereotyped transient nature, a &gt;50% failure rate of breeder-based contracts would scare even a 2006 mortgage seller ;O)

Verified

10 months, 3 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

jtmbls, says:

No kidding. It would be interesting to see how many divorces the people who oppose gay marriage have had yet want to preach the sanctity of the institution. Uh, huh…need a new pair of wading boots.

Anonymous

10 months, 3 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Jason Rice, says:

::how many divorces

.. or mistresses.

Verified

10 months, 3 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

Email Print 15 Comments Contribute

See more stories in:


Quantcast