Content from our friends over at FWCanDo
Monday, January 12, 2009
Fracking in Fort Worth: What’s that you’re smokin’?
In case anyone needs a reminder, this is what a "frack job" looks like. These pics were taken in east Fort Worth in early January, 2009, near Riverside Drive and I-30. The smoke was so dense that, at times, it obscured driving on the interstate highway.
Today, January 12, Chesapeake Energy will frack the so-called Thomas well about 1/2 mile east of this location which is in the West Meadowbrook neighborhood.
Did the City of Fort Worth warn us that fracking might be dangerous to human and animal health? No.
Did the neighborhood association send out an alert? No.
Did the state highway department issue a warning or close the highway? No.
Did the Star-Telegram send out a notice or a reporter? No.
Did Chesapeake Energy warn us that fracking involves the use of over 50 toxic chemicals that can cause cancer, endocrine disruption, neurotoxicity, skin irritations, cardiac toxicity, kidney failure, reproductive disruption, respiratory distress and developmental toxcity? No. No. Hell No!
Just what the heck is in all that smoke and dust that will float over Fort Worth Monday morning??? What exactly will our children and pets and us be breathing when the clouds roll by? Where will the dust settle?
More importantly, where are the elected officials that have allowed this to happen in our community? Do they have fracking in their 'hoods?
For a list of the toxic chemicals used in gas well fracking and other info about the dangers of fracking, look here:
http://www.earthworksaction.org/pubs/Fracking.pdf
http://txsharon.blogspot.com/2008/12/frac-water-chemicals-chemical.html
http://www.newsweek.com/id/154394
http://www.riverreporter.com/issues/08-12-04/fracking.pdf
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/05/05/fracking/print.html
Pegasus News content partner - FWCanDo
Email
|
Print
|
10 Comments
|
Contribute
|
-
»Fort Worth filmed Gasland documentary accepted to Sundance Film Fest
-
»Denton City Council approves gas drilling near residential areas
-
»Protests in Denton continue over natural gas drilling
-
»Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners completes Texas Independence Pipeline
-
»North Texans in Barnett Shale feel effects of sinking natural gas prices
|
an event
|
a restaurant
|
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
|
a movie showtime
|
local music
|
a job
|
a house
|
|
a deal
|
a pet
|
Scott Doyle, says:
Umm, this is a ridiculously broad statement: ...fracking involves the use of over 50 toxic chemicals that can cause cancer, endocrine disruption, neurotoxicity, skin irritations, cardiac toxicity, kidney failure, reproductive disruption, respiratory distress and developmental toxcity?
There are multiple fracking techniques which differ as far as risks & rewards go. While I certainly understand the general concern, blanket statements such as this should be backed up with citations and specifics for particular sites.
Verified
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
Edit: shotgunning links at the end of the article without applying them to this situation isn't exactly prudent citation. Fear-mongering, at best.
Note, I have nothing to do with anything going on out there...I simply have a basic knowledge of what goes on in fracking ops and find it extremely unfair to make such strong allegations without pointing out specifics to this site. Not doing your due diligence when reporting such allegations is reckless in its own right.
Verified
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
David Gouldin, says:
Must ... resist ... nerdy sci-fi puns ...
Staff
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
TXsharon, says:
Scott, you might have to do a little bit of reading and researching for yourself.
Dick Cheney and Halliburton Fracking in YOUR Drinking Water. http://txsharon.blogspot.com/2008/11/...
Written testimony of Theo Colborn, PhD, President of TEDX, Paonia, Colorado before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, hearing on The Applicability of Federal Requirements to Protect Public Health and the Environment from Oil and Gas Development, October 31, 2007 http://s3.amazonaws.com/propublica/as...
Anonymous
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
And? I'm not supporting whether it's safe or dangerous.
There's no discussion of whether anybody fingered is required to provide public notice, whether these risks apply to this specific type of operation, or any direct link of wrongdoing.
"I heard somewhere this ain't good and they didn't tell us, here's some random internettin' on the subject - surely a few sentences apply to us, hope you find 'em" isn't journalism (in my opinion).
As a reader, connections shouldn't have to be made by researching a list of links. The article should give me info I need to form a basic conclusion, with citations from accredited sources reinforcing the message.
Verified
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Pavel Lishin, says:
David: I was tempted, too. Just didn't know how to work it into the discussion.
Verified
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bluetattoo1, says:
Scott, Great points!
Thanks for offering up a refreshing view....
Anonymous
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Chuck, says:
I observe that a picture was provided, and a statement made regarding 'dense smoke'. I haven't seen diesel engines smoke that bad, and if they did, the smoke would be black. I suspect that what is being termed 'dense smoke' is actually water vapor. The fracturing process uses water, and the fluid is largely water on a volume basis. There are points in the aboveground equipment that are open to atmosphere. On a cool morning, the fluid will fog, just as you tend to see around stock tanks and farm ponds.
Anonymous
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
TXsharon, says:
I have frack pictures on my blog and it clearly shows substantial emissions not water vapor. Even if it is water vapor going into the air, that's pretty disturbing given what's in frack fluid.
Anonymous
10 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
tcubridges, says:
I was actually a frac engineer before being laid off at the beginning of march. The smoke seen is the pictures above is not actually smoke! It is very fine sand known as 100 mesh. Sand is used to prop open the fractures created in the earth during these jobs. In terms of the chemicals, there are very few of the chemicals listed on those links used in every job. In the Barnett Shale, the main chemicals are friction reducers, biocides, scaling inhibitors, and oxygen scavengers. I understand some people may worry about Fracing, but it's really not something to worry about. The process is under strict environmental controls and the operators such as XTO, Chesapeake, etc...take every precaution to preserve the communities they operate in.
Anonymous
7 months, 1 week agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal