Similar
Stories
Content from our friends over at TheRockwallNews.com
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Oncor wants electricity customers to pay $93 million for smart meters they’ll never use
The meters are obsolete because they're not up to state regulations.
Editor's Note: An Oncor spokesperson makes a correction that the first-generation meters "are currently in use and will continue to be used for streetlights and other functions where consumer functionality of the newer advanced digital meters isn't needed." We say take it up with them.The Oncor electricity delivery company wants its residential customers to pay $93 million for obsolete “smart meters” the company ordered but customers will now never use because they’re not up to state regulations.
The issue is part of a pending Oncor rate increase which, if approved by the Public Utilities Commission later this year, will increase the average customers’ bill by over five dollars.
In January the company already began charging customers an extra $2.21 per month to pay for new meters that do comply with state regulations - regardless of whether or not they have received a new meter.
The surcharge, which will be collected for 11 years, applies whether or not Oncor customers have received a new meter. The rollout won’t be completed for three years.
Any increase would mark the second time this year that Oncor customers had been told to pay for advanced meters.
The proposal to recover costs for the obsolete meters is a focal point for opponents of the rate hike–among them consumer groups, a coalition of cities and the PUC legal staff.
“These costs should be borne by Oncor, not by ratepayers,” PUC staff attorney Patrick Peters III asserted in a rate case filing.
In an advisory ruling issued last week, two administrative law judges ruled that Oncor is only entitled to part of the amount because its meter purchases were “imprudent,” purchased prematurely and so customers shouldn’t have to foot the whole bill.
Nearly 900,000 smart meters were bought before the Texas Public Utilities Commission issued operating standards, and officials say the meters are not in compliance.
On the other hand, the company thinks their customers should pay for the meters since the equipment was designed to help reduce utility costs for consumers.
All of the smart meters are currently in use and will be replaced with new meters that are in compliance if the cost of those meters can be recovered, said Oncor spokesperson Catherine Cuellar.
The first-generation smart meters will then be reallocated and used for other projects, such as city street lights, where meters do not require the same customer functionality.
Cuellar added that the original meters were bought at the request of the state and that in order to fund the second-generation meters, the company needs to recover the cost of the first-generation meters as well. If that cost cannot be recovered, Cuellar said the original first-generation smart meters will continue to be used by customers at their residences.
“If we didn’t feel as though they were a prudent investment,” company spokesman Chris Schein said, “we would not have sought recovery.”

Pegasus News Content partner - TheRockwallNews.com
Nearby stories
- Cheer local singer Amber Carrington during The Voice viewing party
- Score a year's worth of free burgers at Mooyah's newest Rockwall location
- Female inmate in Rockwall jail hanged herself
- George P. Bush calls for change in Texas education system
- Former Hunt County constable still alive after shooting two people at The Harbor at Rockwall
Faved or commented on by...
Latest Contests
Latest comments...
UPDATED: Second Katy Trail Ice House will open in Plano in late May
Will they still serve Tex-Mex and margaritas? That was my whole reason for a visit to Bandito's at
Vote: Name the best burger in DFW
My new favorite is the green chili cheese burger on a jalapeno bun at Chimy's in Fort Worth. It's th
Oudekerk, anonymous:
"Cuellar added that the original meters were bought at the request of the state and that in order to fund the second-generation meters, the company needs to recover the cost of the first-generation meters as well. If that cost cannot be recovered, Cuellar said the original first-generation smart meters will continue to be used by customers at their residences.
“'If we didn’t feel as though they were a prudent investment,” company spokesman Chris Schein said, 'we would not have sought recovery.'”
Why isn't the State paying for them, rather than ratepayers, who are now paying for the "approved" version?
Schein apparently went to a business school where the laws of physics were suspended.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Catherine Cuellar, verified:
In Saturday's Dallas Morning News, the paper ran a correction to this story stating Oncor's first generation automated meters are currently in use and will continue to be used for streetlights and other functions where consumer functionality of the newer advanced digital meters isn't needed.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
David Goodspeed, verified:
and even though my power is still out due to the storm I bet I still have to pay my 2 bucks this month ... not to mention the double-billing last month (grumble, grumble)
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Pavel Lishin, verified:
So, is Oncor a provider, or do they just control how the electricity comes to your home? Basically, can you just switch to (shameless plug) Green Mountain and avoid the whole surcharge, as well as indirectly showing 'em who's boss?
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
What do you think?