Content from our friends over at North Dallas Gazette
Monday, March 9, 2009
Local lawmakers concerned with youth’s health, education, safety
Since the Legislature’s committees are now fully active, politicians in Austin are focusing on gaining support for bills as they come up for consideration. Representatives from the Metroplex were especially busy this past week.
On Monday, March 2, Representative Vicki Truitt of Keller presented her bill, House Resolution (HCR) 54 to the House. HCR 54 is generally referred to as the “porn free internet” bill.
The resolution would not change any Texas laws, but, if passed, would put pressure from the Texas Legislature onto the U.S. Congress to pass the Internet Community Ports Act (ICPA).
The ICPA, a bill getting much attention in Washington D.C. and being endorsed by other states, has yet to be presented to the U.S. Congress. The purpose of the ICPA would limit access to and regulate adult content via the internet; it is aimed at limiting the exposure of children to such content by helping parents monitor and control what content their child will see or be able to find on the web.
If Texas adopts this resolution, the ICPA will gain more momentum to be passed when presented to Congress.
HCR 54 has been referred to the Technology, Economic Development, and Workforce Committee. Some testimony and public hearings were held last week in regards to the resolution, but as of Friday, March 6, HCR 54 was left pending in committee.
On Thursday, March 5, Dallas Representative Helen Giddings presented her bill, House Bill (HB) 1807. HB 1807 is designed to protect Texans who work in the construction industry and pertains directly to crane operators, inspectors, riggers, and signal persons.
Her bill suggests Texas require these workers to be certified and licensed by the State and by the National Commission for the Certification of Crane Operators (NCCCO). By overseeing the licensing and complying with NCCCO standards, she feels construction sites will become safer work environments.
The bill has been referred to the House’s Licensing and Administration Procedures Committee, and, as of Friday, March 6, is not scheduled for any type of hearings or public testimony.
Carrollton Representative Burt Solomons brought attention to his bill, HB 1310, on Friday. HB 1310 suggests minors have limited access to indoor tanning beds. Specifically, the bill would require a parent’s knowledge, consent, and accompaniment, along with a physician’s note stating the maximum amount of overall time or number of sessions the minor is allowed to have. The goal of the bill is to reduce premature skin cancer and protect the health of Texas youth.
HB 1310 was referred to the Public Health Committee and, as of Friday, March 6, not scheduled for any reviews.
Area Senators were also busy this week. Senator John Carona of Dallas announced his bill, Senate Bill (SB) 1256. The bill would create “No-Gang Zones” around places where children frequent, like schools, parks, youth centers, and playgrounds. SB 1256 purposes harsher penalties for people convicted of involvement in gang activities near these purposed “No-Gang Zones.”
As of Friday, March 6, SB 1256 has not been referred to any committee or scheduled to be considered on the Senate floor.
Plano Senator Florence Shapiro also presented two of her bills this week.
On Wednesday, March 4, she presented SB 175 to the Senate Committee for Higher Education; Shapiro is also the chair of that committee. SB 175 would limit the number of freshmans a university can accept under Texas Top 10% Rule.
The Top 10% Rule, passed in 1997, guarantees any applicant to a university admission if the student finished high school within the top 10% of their class. Universities are now finding most incoming freshman classes are primarily admitted under the Top 10% Rule. Without a cap, freshman classes fill faster and lack diversity, ultimately taking away from the students’ university experience and learning opportunities. Additionally, since they are required to accept all top 10% applicants many universities are becoming limited on space.
After hearing testimony from various University of Texas officials, SB 175 was passed by the Senate Higher Education Committee to the Senate floor for further review.
On Thursday, March 5, Shapiro also presented SB 3. SB 3 purposes overhauling the accountability of public school systems. She suggests eliminating the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills, or TAKS test, and base accountability on a two tiered ranking system – accreditation and overall district distinction. The accreditation tier would consist of student achievement, college preparedness, and workforce skills and readiness at the time of graduation, and district distinction would consist of student achievements, fine arts programs and opportunities, and general language skills and programs.
SB 3 will be heard by the Senate Education Committee later in session.
More committee meetings and bill presentations are scheduled this week for both the House and the Senate.

Pegasus News content partner - North Dallas Gazette
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
-
»State representative addresses Propositions 2 and 3 on constitutional amendments ballot
-
»Voters guide: Proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution for November 3 election
-
»TxDOT online project tracker shows congestion on Dallas-Fort Worth roads
-
»New Texas traffic, criminal laws set to go into effect September 1
-
»Eric Johnson, potential opponent for Texas Rep. Terri Hodge, reports $60,000 raised for race


So if HCR 54 passes, they'll what - glower at Congress for awhile? What does "putting pressure on" mean?
And doesn't the presence of "No-Gang Zones" with tougher punishment imply that there are "Pro-Gang Zones" where gangsters are encouraged to, uh... I don't really know what it is they do. Do they still do the little menacing dance thing? Or do they just shoot each other?
Pavel Lishin Verified
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
I love weakening the "top 10" policy because "it hampers diversity." You mean "some of the top performers but mostly just people that look different." Heck, since their only purpose any more is to play football and make money off logo licensing, what the heck are they doing pretending to use grades for selection anyway?
Pavel, the "menacing dance" is still a primary function of gangs and “No-Gang Zones” are easily affected with hormone repellents you can pick up at the Vet. So things are "a bit more" illegal there and that should fix it.
That should easily balance out the tens of millions of dollars of marketing and merchandising of "gangsta" type products and culture these kids are exposed to daily. Thanks Disney, Nike.
Jason Rice Verified
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
How does the "Top 10" policy hamper diversity? Are you saying the "diverse" are not smart enough to make the cut?
The rationale for this stupid law is absurd
Catbird Anonymous
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
As a high school senior who is not in the top 10% but still has a GPA of over 100, I must respectfully disagree with both assessments of the new Top 10% policy. In my opinion, this would only help to improve the unfair nature of the college admission process. It is very close minded to assume that “diverse” has only one connotation-whether the others are implied by the lawmakers or not, the unintentional inclusion of a greater number of well-rounded, creative students can only be seen as a benefit. Especially since the top 10% policy has always been unkind to those who which to focus on electives while still maintaining remarkable grades in academic courses. I know numerous hard working, intellectual individuals who are not in the top 10% for various reasons such as late arrival to Texas schools, ridiculously unjust ranking systems, and overbearing parents taking their children out of weighted Pre-AP or AP courses that improve rank (so as to relieve stress); more often than not, these honest, determined pupils are much more deserving of their desired education path than the sometimes dishonest, ungrateful students who wind up in the cherished top 10%. [It should be noted that I am by no means referring to all top 10% students nor am I referring to all bottom 90% students; I am only sharing what I have observed in my own high school. It should also be noted that I personally have no desire to go to a school in Texas. I am just eager to share my views and rant about a situation that has continuously irked me over the last couple of years.] So as to be somewhat brief, because after all "brevity is the soul of wit," this law is not absurd at all. Grades should never be the sole reason you get into college. Contrary to what most people believe, individuals cannot be transfigured into numbers; whether the digits combine to form a bank statement, a weight, or a grade, the attempted representation is never the entire portrait of the complex individual that is to be understood.
kayli_anne Anonymous
6 months, 1 week ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal