Tuesday, March 10, 2009 , Updated
Dallas homeless organizations need to develop trust
More stories about the homeless:
When we have solved the problem of homelessness in Dallas, we will know it. We will not need to ticket, arrest and harass homeless people for being on the streets of our town in order to get them out of sight. They won’t need to be on the street, because they will have access to housing, social programs, and jobs which pay a living wage.
Our programs serving the homeless will not be averse to criticism, because they will be good, fair, evenhanded and effective. They will work, and, if they do not work, we will listen to those who ‘know how to,’ and we will change them. Therefore, they will be funded.
Take the example of the Stewpot. When the Stewpot puts out an appeal, people generously respond. Why? Because this is an organization which has credibility, viability, integrity and staying power. Rules are rules, and the homeless clients they serve know this; the rules are for everyone, and they don’t change every day. A client may or may not believe that a rule is fair; nonetheless, trust is built with the organization because those living in the perilous and shifting sands that street life offers know what to expect at the Stewpot, day in and day out. Donors have the confidence that their donations, in-kind and monetary, will be directed efficiently to the targeted population. There is a strong, trusted, and experienced leader at the Stewpot [Rev. Bruce Buchanan], and there is accountability among the staff to him.
Clarity. Consistency. Transparency.
Here is a conversation I had with an intelligent and well-educated ‘chronically homeless’ individual recently in response to my question, “Do you use the [homeless assistance center and shelter system]?”
“I tried it for a while, but I gave up. If I want craziness, I can get it out here [on the street]. I don’t have to go there to get it. They want me to give up whatever drugs I might want to use, but then they want to put me on their [prescription] drugs in order to sedate me into being a person who can fit into their way of doing things and be compliant.”
I am not an advocate of ‘recreational’ drugs — don’t use them or champion their legalization. I think they are almost wholly destructive. But this point of view makes sense from a certain perspective.
What is the element that is missing between this homeless individual and the organizations built to facilitate her or his getting off the street? Trust. I’m not sure I would trust the system much either if I were in his or her position, and I understand the viewpoint even from the privileged perspective of being a property owner and a taxpayer [although, as we are seeing, even these privileges are quite tenuous in uncertain times.]
But when one is utterly powerless and living on the street, it is not likely that one will give up the little power and comfort one has in order to put oneself in the hands of authorities which are perceived to be unreliable, unpredictable and whimsical in their exercise of power, at best. Not one of us would choose that, would we? Is it a character flaw to choose independent living, rough as it is, over the perception of a dangerous surrender? We have squandered an opportunity to win the trust of some chronically homeless individuals in recent months, and I hope it can be rebuilt.
“If I want craziness, I can get it out here. I don’t have to go there to get it.” A concise and eloquent statement.
When we have solved the problem of homelessness in Dallas, we will know it. There won’t be hundreds to thousands of homeless individuals living in the woods, hiding from Dallas authorities. We won’t have to dissemble, harass, prosecute, and hound people into shelters and treatment. Our programs will be open to constructive criticism, and our responses to the same will be forthcoming, measured and rational.
As my friend, David Timothy, says of his organization, the SoupMobile: “I don’t want us to just look good. I want us to be good.”
That is a goal worth striving for, and it is the only one that will succeed.
This article was submitted by a member of the Pegasus News community.

JG, says:
Considering a large number of the homeless suffer from some sort of mental illness which directly contributes to their homelessness, any obstacle would be a challenge.
A difficult situation with no easy answer for all who try to help.
Anonymous
8 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Russ Vandeveerdonk, says:
Great article, Rev. Bruce Buchanan, with The Stewpot is truly a leader. This issue will never die, because it is important. We must continue helping a fellow man, helping a fellow-American!
Verified
8 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
alexander troup, says:
I did ask this guy what was wrong with some places that are to help the homeless and he said they were behind the times in handling human welfare...I did some homework and did investigate a social service place and realized, he was right, these folks are taking care of homeless on the 1990s style and scale..
Then again, what made homless in New Orleans in 2005.....look to the right and look to the left and choose who you will judge these comming years... and hope your are not homeless......A/T, Give peace a good chance...
Verified
8 months, 3 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bumwrapper, says:
Bravo Karen! Well said.
Anonymous
8 months, 2 weeks agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal