Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Texas senate gives preliminary approval to sobriety checkpoints bill
Email
|
Print
|
Tell us your story
|
Comments (17)
|
The Texas Senate gave preliminary approval Monday to a controversial bill that would allow law enforcement to establish sobriety checkpoints in Texas. The bill, SB 298, passed 20-11 only after its author, State Sen. John Carona (R-Dallas) amended it to apply only to the state’s most populous counties and cities.
Six Republicans and four Democrats were among those casting “no” votes.
The vote broke down as follows:
Yeas: Averitt, Carona, Davis, Duncan, Ellis, Fraser, Harris, Huffman, Lucio, Nelson, Nichols, Patrick, Seliger, Shapiro, Shapleigh, VanideiPutte, Watson, Wentworth, West, Zaffirini.
Nays: Deuell, Eltife, Estes, Gallegos, Hegar, Hinojosa, Jackson, Ogden, Uresti, Whitmire, Williams.
The bill gets its third and final reading in the Senate Tuesday before moving on to the House.
Legislation similar to Carona’s has been introduced almost every legislative session since 2003. Texas is one of only a handful of states without sobriety checkpoints–to the chagrin of MADD and other special interest groups.
Texas’ ended its brief practice of sobriety checkpoints in 1994 after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals deemed them illegal unless specifically authorized by the state legislature.
We’ve commented several times on why sobriety checkpoints are a bad idea, and think it is worth noting again:
There are a lot of reasons that sobriety checkpoints are a bad idea. For one thing, they are ineffective–they often catch no one driving drunk while costing taxpayers as much as $10,000 per checkpoint. Since they are highly visible and publicized, habitual and more dangerous drunk drivers can easily avoid them.
In addition, they can cause a lot of problems for low-income drivers. For one thing, at such a checkpoint, you can bet they aren’t just going to be asking you to blow. They’ll be asking for insurance, registration, looking at every tail light, and trying, generally, to write as many tickets as possible.
This puts millions of low-income Texas drivers at risk of losing their vehicles and having to pay thousands of dollars in fines and fees when they weren’t even driving poorly. For example, if a poor Texan’s vehicle registration or inspection expires in between paychecks, they may have to wait until they get paid to get their car inspected or pay for their vehicle registration. While that driving around for a week with an expired MVI or license plate harms no one (after all, the state is still going go get their money) the ticket the low-income driver gets will harm them.
Pegasus News content partner - Grits For Breakfast
Related stories
- Denton police may not use sobriety checkpoints (April 13, 2009)
See more stories in:
Find...
Latest comments
- FOOD_FOOD on Nana's Kountry Kitchen in Grapevine is proud of its chicken-fried steak: THIS RESTAURANT DOES NOT HAVE A SIGN OUT FRONT YET!!! LOOK FOR A SIGN THAT SAYS “GRAND OPENING” AFTE...
- John McClelland on In which my cynicism about Dallas County taxes is proven at least partially wrong: School bonds that everyone keeps passing :)...
- John McClelland on T. Boone Pickens pushes his energy plan to packed house at UT-Dallas: I hate to, but have to agree with him. But I think he should invest more in solar tech too. Gas dril...
- zainypagan on The Biggest Loser week 8: Tracey takes the long way home: Alex with all due respect many of us do find D.C. to be very exciting. I have never been to Bora Bor...
Latest reviews
- Billusa99 on Pappas Bros. Steak House: Agent 99 and I had dinner here last week for our anniversary and it was stellar! The somm. we had re...
- Colby Walton on El Taco H (Grapevine): Tried this Grapevine strip center taqueria for the first time tonight, after seeing it mentioned in ...
- lindabear1 on Banana Leaf Thai Cuisine: We live in Garland and this is “way up there”, but we had a coupon! Now we will go back again becaus...
Comments
duispy Anonymous
Texas needs to get ready for these checkpoints by joining www.DUISPY.com. We comb the internet for DUI checkpoint notifications every 30 minutes and send the ones in your area to your cell phone. Join now Texas. The law has passed.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Alex Bentley Staff
Law hasn't passed yet, duispy -- it's just been given preliminary approval.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
alexander troup Verified
HOW ABOUT APPLE JACK APPLE CIDER...A/T, farm boy..
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Marcquis Giddings Verified
Camera's everywhere, licence plate scanners, "DUI" checkpoints...
Lone Star State = Police State
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
Don't forget the smoking ban. The "cow tax" is just around the corner.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
That's the one you're really worried about right?
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
The smoking ban or the cow tax?
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Jesus Valadez Verified
What's a cow tax?
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Mike Orren Staff
Let the cows pay the cow tax.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Clay213 Anonymous
The cow tax.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
Jesus - There is a link on one of these threads here somewhere but I am too hung-over to find it.
In a nutshell, some environmentalist somewhere proposed a $175.00 per head tax on cattle to offset their carbon footprint. Since cows are supposedly the largest producers of methane gas, ironically due to the fact that they exist solely on a vegetarian diet. Or something like that.
Yes specialclay. I toss and turn at night worrying about the cow tax as I am sure you worry about the horse’s ass tax that is certain to follow.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Jesus Valadez Verified
Noooooooo, don't tax my cows! I need my cheap meat. :(
How am I going to live without my fajitas?
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
jtmbls Anonymous
I was going to say beans but then they might try to tax you! :b
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
Mike Orren Staff
Let the cows pay the cow tax.
Miko making me lol at the office is detrimental to me checking PN from work.
It was worth it. =p
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
Secondary lol of the thread: Finally, a spammer with USEFUL info...botching it by assuming preliminary approval means we've already converted. :(
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Andrew Anonymous
The argument that if a poor person's inspection or registration expires between paychecks is a weak one. Since the Texas Payday Act requires hourly employees to be paid at least 2 times a month, this in between period is 1 to 14 days. Lets say an average of 7 days.
If a cop writes you a ticket for a one week expired tag, then barring the possibility you were pulled over by Officer Powell, you were probably exhibiting an attitude problem. Also, state law allows for a maximum administration fee of about $10-$15 to dimiss that ticket if you get your car registered or inspected before the court date.
I agree with the other problems with the checkpoints, but I will not stand by when people play the minority/low income card to justify a stance. I have commented several times on this site against using that argument for justifying driving without insurance. It is the cost of owning a car.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Scott Doyle Verified
Gotta tell ya, I'm on board with Andrew here.
Vehemently disagree with the checkpoints, however playing the "poor peeps can't afford tix" card is tough to keep your poker face on since having a car is a responsibility. Driving a heap around that can't pass a simple inspection is a danger in its own right.
I stand by the ridiculous overstepping of bounds checkpoints create when it comes to probable cause. Per dfwdwi.com (lol @ URL, btw):
When cops are creating the circumstance, and go on to brow-beat people for information...if anything you say, do, hesitate to do, etc is - in their sole opinion - an indication you might be intoxicated, you're toast. Considering refusal of sobriety or breath/blood tests is essentially an automatic arrest, people really need to think twice before supporting this bill.
I'm sure DWI attorneys are lobbying for this, come to think of it. Seems they stand to gain the most, anyways. It's simply a padding of the record for cops - it's alotta money in the bank for attorneys just to get what is likely an unfounded charge dismissed.
7 months, 1 week ago ( Link to this comment | Suggest removal )
Post a comment