Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Lancaster ISD withholds superintendent’s paycheck, continuing a relationship that should’ve been severed
LANCASTER So, according to the settlement agreement, Larry Lewis and Lancaster ISD were to be done with each other by the end of July this year.
Is it over?
Sadly, it's never that simple.
Less than two weeks before the July 31st final termination date, the school district found reason to take a new action. The last July paycheck to Lewis was withheld. This was because, as the district saw it, Lewis had violated the settlement agreement. He had a new employer. The settlement agreement (below; see page 3) clearly anticipated the possibility that Lewis would find a new job and set out the next steps. Those steps included providing written notice and an immediate resignation.
Settlement agreement
Letter of Explanation for Recommendation of SettlementThe school's attorneys had documentation (probably something like the file below), showing Lewis had begun working with AFLAC insurance in December of 2008). Since Lewis had not provided this information nor resigned, the district was withholding his last paycheck. (It is not clear how the district decided not to attempt recovery of payments made earlier.)
Larry Lewis's license
Lewis LicenseLewis and his attorneys responded in early August. This already dragged the LISD/Lewis relationship out past the anticipated July 31, 2009 separation date. Lewis's attorney provided a series of documents, represented to be from 2007, indicating the Lewis/AFLAC relationship was "old news." And in a followup, Lewis's attorney warned he would be sending the district an invoice for his time and effort, as the "prevailing party" in the dispute.
The payment records for the school district's current fiscal year show they were still paying Lewis as late as August 25th. But even beyond that, Lewis asserted a claim to even more payments owed him, to cover his costs associated with his health insurance benefits.
So, at present, the relationship and disputes appear to be ongoing.
It's perhaps worth a look back at the "old news" regarding Lewis's relationship with AFLAC. According to records provided by his attorneys, Lewis approached the board about a "consulting" position with AFLAC in October, 2007.
This is the context for the request Lewis made 1 October, 2007.
For context, let's review 2007. The year opened with questions about finances, audits, and the district's Chief Financial Officer, Eugene Smith. By summer, a controversial, and possibly money-saving proposal for a "four-day week" was being widely discussed. Academic and Financial ratings from TEA dropped in August of that year. On September 27, 2007 the Texas Education Agency had announced intentions to come audit Lewis's books.
And Eugene Smith learned he was about to be arrested for embezzlement from his previous employers.
According to a letter written by former Lancaster ISD trustee Russ Johnson, (released by Lewis's attorney Rich Hill, below), Lewis asked the board for permission to take on a second job in his spare time. According to Johnson, this happened during an executive session scheduled for hearing an employee grievance. (State law, as the district notes, calls for such permission to be discussed and approved in open session -- see the Education Code chapter 11, paragraph(e).)
Letter from former Lancaster ISD trustee Russ Johnson
July Johnson LtrJohnson's 2009 letter is reinforced by a similar letter (below) by former trustee Sue Mendoza. This is odd, because according to the district's records of that board meeting, she was not there that evening. She, of course, did not vote regarding the executive session, either.
Letter from former Lancaster ISD trustee Sue Mendoza
July24 Mendoza LtrAnother letter from former trustee Shelia Stanmore is, reputedly, also claiming similar recollection. The letter is being reviewed by the state attorney general to determine whether or not it may be released.
Another letter released this summer via Lewis's attorney is apparently dated October 5, 2007. This was from former Lancaster ISD board president Ed Kirkland, below. It reads "Pursuant to the provisions outlined in your Second Amended Employment Contract, this letter shall serve as written consent from the Lancaster Independent School District, Board of Trustees for you to provide consulting services to American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus ("AFLAC")."
Letter from former Lancaster ISD board president Ed Kirkland
KirklandPemission2ndContractLewis's "Second Amended Employment Contract" (the first document below) was superseded in March 2008 by the "Third Amended Employment Contract" (the second document below).
Larry Lewis' Superintendent's Contract, 2006-2007
LewisSupContract06-07Larry Lewis' Superintendent's Contract, 2008-2009
LewisSupContract08-09The October 2007, permission to "consult" with AFLAC is offered as evidence that the December 2008 licensing contract with AFLAC was, or should have been known, to the current board during their settlement negotiations with Lewis. The letter from Ed Kirkland appears to be key to the matter.
Email
|
Print
|
Comment
|
Tell us your story
|
- »State approves funding for Lancaster Municipal Airport
- »Lancaster teens throw a temper tantrum when theater won't let them in
- »Cedar Valley College’s Family Music Theatre reveals 2009 spring musical
- »Cedar Valley College awarded $400,000 from U.S. Dept. of Education
- »'Subway' robber arrested in Lancaster

Note the date of Russ Johnson's letter: July 25,2009. Note that all letters were written around that time. Given that they were not recorded in a systematic manner when the event occurred, they do not qualify as business records. Past recollection recorded? Maybe, but would they have even known the details if their memory hadn't been revived with some suggestions? I hardly call those letters credible. A jury would see right through them. Care to guess who asked him to write the letter? Note the people who wrote letters. All Lewis supporters. No one who was not a Lewis supporter wrote a letter acknowledging the disclosure was made. Interestingly, since the matter wasn't posted on the agenda as an executive meeting, the letters all indicated admissions that the Open Meetings Act was violated. What does that do for their credibility? Then, when Sue Mendoza says she attended a meeting that the minutes say she didn't attend, we really have to wonder what her motive is. Do they really expect us to believe they remembered what happened in an executive session two years ago?
This doesn't pass the smell test. I really don't understand why the district didn't call Lewis' attorney's bluff.
Anyway, this points out something. It wasn't about the children. It was about finding a school district with some school board members who could be taken advantage of by a man with an inflated ego. The wishful thinkers of whom I speak are Nannette Vick, Russ Johnson, Sue Mendoza, Rick Glover, Marie Elliot, and Shelia Stanmore. Thank goodness, they are all gone from the board, and may they never return.
It looks to me like they are circling the wagons. Truth doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is that they save their so called Messiah. They are blind and they are blinded by a man who used a PhD to establish instant credibility.
This whole thing has convinced me that a PhD isn't worth much any more. Nobody is worth a premium salary merely because he has a PhD. If you want to lead a school district, show me several years of teaching in the classroom in a core subject like English, math, or history, with excellent results. Don't come here with flashy clothes and an extravagant lifestyle and expect me to bow and scrape. Our so-called Messiah (sent from God for the children) was not a model to anyone as a scholar, as a leader, or as a citizen.
That he would threaten the school district with litigation on such flimsy evidence is not a good reflection on his character or his true intent.
Interestedcitizen5 Anonymous
1 week, 5 days ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal