Jump to: site navigation, content.

Local stuff that matters to you.
Did you know about Materials & Meanings at Dallas Museum of Art today?
News & events for
Sunday, November
22

Content from our friends over at North Texas Daily

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Same-sex Homecoming bill at University of North Texas left to student vote

8

SGA student Sen. Talya Paeglis, an accounting junior, explains why she voted “no” to a bill that would allow same-sex and gender-neutral couples to run for positions on the Homecoming court. Paeglis represents the College of Business in the student senate.

Melissa Boughton / North Texas Daily

SGA student Sen. Talya Paeglis, an accounting junior, explains why she voted “no” to a bill that would allow same-sex and gender-neutral couples to run for positions on the Homecoming court. Paeglis represents the College of Business in the student senate.

— Students will soon decide whether same-sex or gender-neutral couples have the right to run for Homecoming court.

After weeks of controversy centered on the Student Government Association’s rejection of the same-sex Homecoming bill, the student senate approved a referendum during Wednesday’s meeting allowing students to vote on the issue.

“I would like to put faith in the student body,” SGA president Dakota Carter said. “I think this is an issue that needs to be decided by them, because they’ll be affected by it, and I think they need to express their opinions.”

The referendum will be held sometime in mid-November.

The change comes after Homecoming court winners were announced Saturday.

If students vote “yes,” the senate must pass the bill before the end of the spring semester. The referendum would allow same-sex couples to run for Homecoming court in fall 2010.

If students vote “no,” the senate will not consider the bill until summer 2010 at earliest.

April Murphy, English literature graduate student, spoke at the SGA meeting in hopes to work with the student senate on creating a new bill to eliminate discrimination at homecoming for same-sex and gender-neutral couples.

Melissa Boughton / North Texas Daily

April Murphy, English literature graduate student, spoke at the SGA meeting in hopes to work with the student senate on creating a new bill to eliminate discrimination at homecoming for same-sex and gender-neutral couples.

The senate members debated the wording of the resolution, but the final version made the students’ vote binding on the SGA.

The resolution was approved 22 to 1, but students who attended the meeting expressed mixed opinions.

Davlin Kerekes, a social work senior, said she disagreed with the idea of the referendum.

“Equality is not something to be voted on at all,” said Davlin Kerekes, a social work senior. “The rights of a minority should not be put to the vote of the majority.”

English graduate student April Murphy spoke up several times at the meeting and said she was pleased with the senate’s decision.

“We came here with a lot of disparate groups with a lot of tension, and we opened up a discussion and dialogue, and through it we came to a solution that we can agree with,” Murphy said.

Speaker Pro Tempore Jessika Curry was the only student senate member to vote against the referendum.

Curry said she didn’t agree with its binding condition.

“There’s a lot of student body turnover,” she said. “There will be thousands of students gone and thousands more come before we can consider any new legislation and I don’t think that was the best way to achieve the same result, but I do encourage everyone to vote.”

Sen. Meghan Hudec for the college of public affairs and community service voted for the resolution and said she would work to get her constituents involved.

“It gives students a chance to say what they want, which is what we’re here for, to be their voice,” she said.

The senate also confirmed Jerrod Ballard, a criminal justice junior, as an SGA Supreme Court justice.

The SGA supreme court struck down a bill on Oct. 20 that made it more difficult for students to vote senators out of office.

The senate complicated the removal process at a previous meeting after outraged campus groups protested the rejection of the same-sex Homecoming bill.


Pegasus News content partner - North Texas Daily


  • Staff
  • Verified User
  • Anonymous

Mob rule should not determine basic civil rights.

John McClelland Verified

4 weeks, 1 day ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

I agree civil rights should not and really never been determined by popular vote. Majority votes (based on polls at the time) would have defeated women's right to vote, black right, interracial marriage to name a few.

While I too disagree the popular vote path exemplifies lack of spine from lawmakers, I'm hopeful the younger generation is arguably less encumbered to vote based on the "tradition" of discrimination.

snowboard9 Anonymous

4 weeks, 1 day ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

I look at it this way. We are just forms of energy resting in the sea of our creator's energy. I would never be so bold to look upon another form negativity, but can only acknowledge the unique and equal gift of life within.

tetsujin28 Anonymous

4 weeks, 1 day ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

<i>I look at it this way. We are just forms of energy resting in the sea of our creator's energy. I would never be so bold to look upon another form negativity, but can only acknowledge the unique and equal gift of life within. </i>

I'd love to look at it that way if I could puzzle out what the hell you're trying to say.

Pavel Lishin Verified

4 weeks, 1 day ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Quit the fence straddling.

Elect the King of the Bean and get on with it.

Why do you need two?

If it's all equal... one is friggin' plenty to fulfill one of the most inexplicably stupid academic traditions in the history of opposable thumbs.

Jason Rice Verified

4 weeks, 1 day ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

The way I remember it at UNT, same sex 'couples' was redefined daily. It's the best part of college (sorry mothers); rotating the bedroom crops.

*Meanwhile back in the academic jungle, I didn't learn what 'gender neutral' meant. But I did that time when I watched Jerry Springer and watched that' plumber's face when his 'bride' confessed that she was, in fact, a man.*

Bottom (or top) line for me: if anyone really cares about Homecoming Queens and Kings(?!) by all means let's define that any way one wishes. And per same-sex homecoming candidates and their potential role for alums; it might jog the memory of those once-young male student bodies of that night at the frat house when they woke up with Donny (and Eric). Perhaps reminding the collegiate-males-of yesteryear unfaithful... when they get too doctrinaire in the course of their golfing game played with let's-pretend middle-aged gay-bashing buddies.

Rawlins Gilliland Verified

4 weeks ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Didn't there used to be a similar prohibition against "interracial" couples?

chriss Anonymous

3 weeks, 2 days ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

Well, but that was obviously a good idea. I mean, just look at them - they're animals! They treat each other like garbage, have no respect for themselves or their fellow man, and their only ambition in life is to eventually lounge around and do nothing.

White people are stupid, and shouldn't even be allowed to date themselves, much less other races.

Pavel Lishin Verified

3 weeks, 2 days ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

Email Print Comment Tell us your story

See more stories in:


Quantcast