Content from our friends over at North Texas Daily
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
UT Arlington student congress may end print version of campus newspaper
The Shorthorn will only be available online if the measure passes.
Students at the University of Texas at Arlington will lose the ability to read their morning newspaper if the school’s student congress passes a measure to stop the presses.
The school’s student government introduced a resolution that would restrict its student newspaper, The Shorthorn, to an online-only version as part of a series of environmentally friendly initiatives.
Any changes will require further research and discussion, The Shorthorn editor-in-chief Marissa Hall said.
The Shorthorn’s staff is working on improving the paper's website, which has fewer readers than the print version, she said.
“There’s ways to be creative online. We have to learn to adjust and work in different ways,” Hall said. “It’s not anything to get upset about at this point.”
Newspapers that go exclusively online tend to do so for business rather than environmental reasons, Neil Foote of the UNT journalism faculty said.
Newsprint is one of the biggest costs for a paper to maintain, and as ad and subscription revenues decline, newspapers have to cut back.
Other money-saving practices used by newspapers include smaller print size and narrower margins, he said.
The movement of more papers to exclusive online formats in the future will depend on whether advertisers decide they want more online ads, he said.
At present, there is still a sense from many readers that they want paper editions of the news. Readers who were brought up reading a daily print version often like to continue the tradition, Foote said.
“A lot of people like to cuddle up with a paper. How could you do that with a computer?” he said.
Former North Texas Daily adviser and journalism faculty member Tracy Everbach said the paper is not yet ready to go entirely online.
Student newspapers are different from city newspapers because they are available for pickup on campus, Everbach said.
Students are more likely to pick up a copy and read it on the way to class than they are to look up stories online, she said.
“Perhaps in the future it might be practical to have an online-only version, but I still think a paper version is vital on campus,” Everbach said.
A change to online-only content for the NT Daily would have serious consequences for the paper, NT Daily director Jacqi Serie said.
“If our print edition ceased to exist, the organization as a whole would probably shut down,” she said.
In a single fiscal year, ad revenue for the NT Daily averages $265,000 for print ads and $5,000 for online ads, she said.
If the Daily were to continue operating, staff positions would have to be completely redefined, and some full-time positions would have to be made part-time, she said.
Ad revenue for The Shorthorn could not be determined at this time.
After numerous attempts, Dakota Carter, president of the UNT Student Government Association, could not be reached for comment about the SGA’s stance on the issue.
Some UNT students said they liked both print and online versions of news, but did not feel too strongly about either.
“It depends on the setting,” Tony Steadman, an international studies freshman, said. “If it’s spur of the moment, I prefer online. Settings where there’s a long wait — definitely a newspaper.”

Content partner - North Texas Daily
Email
|
Print
|
18 Comments
|
Contribute
|
Similar stories
- 10 things to watch in Dallas for 2010
- Pegasus News' 10 most commented-upon stories of 2009
- Dallas-based Belo chief financial officer retires, replaced by another
- New management structure at Dallas Morning News not necessarily a bad thing
- Dallas band Pantera featured in commemorative issue of REVOLVER magazine
Faved or commented on by...
Find...
an event
|
a restaurant
|
a garage sale
|
a drink special
|
a movie
|
local music
|
a deal
|
a job
|
a pet
|
a house
|

Travis Bush, says:
Saves money for keg beer..
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Jesus Valadez, says:
and save trees! Yeah...
Anyways, I never see anybody read the school paper here at UTD so might as well get rid of the paper version as well.
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott Doyle, says:
You mean to tell me the Mercury isn't read cover to cover by every UTD student?
Blasphemy!
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Jesus Valadez, says:
Blasphemy indeed!
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
ch0, says:
Five sentences about UTA, and more than thrice that about UNT? Bait-and-switch!
Anonymous
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
david torres, says:
with Liberal Journalisn on the downswing, those young skulls full of mush, are seeing a drop in readership, like the NY Times. The Shorthorn was a good paper and i would grab it, just to see the ads, not so much for it's "journalisn"... just my opinion....
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
david torres, says:
i would have put Richland Paper up, against some of these university papers, too...although it was a LONG TIME AGO.
just my opinion.....
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Casandra Haynes, says:
Good! I hope other school newspapers will do this too because it will help with the "GoGreen" movement. I know here in my dorm at UNT the NTDaily just sits there until they put new papers in the stands every morning and the old ones just go into the recycling bins. Let's stop wasting paper and move to the online version!
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
david torres, says:
But if you go "online only" how much print advertising will the university/dept stand to lose? As a local business, I would rather take my chances, by a passerby grabbing the paper seeing my ad, than someone going online to read "the daily news". If it's "going green" you're looking for, there has to be other alternatives, than just dropping your school newspaper. Just my opinion...
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Travis Bush, says:
Online ads will be propagated all over the place..can't see how any business would object..probably cost less to advertise as well.
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
david torres, says:
how does online revenue get tabulated? by the number of 'hits'? I trust the print media, alot more. I think it's just easier to grab one of the remaining copies, that's sitting there, than grab your laptop, get on yourdailynewspaper.edu and see the ads. Reading the ads have more impact on me, as a consumer and as a small business owner. I would rather pay a little more to get more than the alternative. I guess i'm just old school... just my opinion...
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Travis Bush, says:
The article states that ad revenue was already declining. One imagines this has a direct correlation with the cost of printing and maintaining a paper presence. Going all online may allow the paper to offer cheaper advertising options and bring back some of that business. Just takes creative ways of making the ads work.
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Jason Rice, says:
::making the ads work.
... like hijacking the browser with Flash Crap?
(hint, hint, mister marketing genius Peg Central)
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
Travis Bush, says:
SHUT IT, JRice! I was referring to making the ads profitable for the businesses..you may now return to your regularly scheduled QQ..
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
david torres, says:
maybe the college journalism/printing dept needs to determine how much printing is necessary.Maybe a business decision/plan, before deciding to SCRAP print journalism? I didn't actually read the article...just the previous posts. MY BAD!! i just liked reading the shorthorn and Richland Chronicle (weekly) more for the ads, than the stories. I know, that's wacky, but that's me.....just my opinion...
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
arlington, says:
The article that started this discussion contains a major error: The UTA Student Congress does not have the authority to tell The Shorthorn not to publish a print edition. If the resolution passes, it will be nonbinding
Anonymous
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
david torres, says:
Can the governor veto it? <g></g>
Verified
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
bessalvarez, says:
To Whom It May Concern:
Thank you for taking an interest in UT Arlington Student Congress resolution 09-15. I would like to take some time to share with you some information about this resolution.
Resolution 09-15 is one of three sustainability resolutions that I authored during the summer of 2009. They were introduced to Student Congress in the beginning of the fall semester at UT Arlington, as that governing body does not meet during the summer.
I am no longer a student at UT Arlington, nor am I currently affiliated with the UT Arlington Student Congress. In fact, the only person that may officially speak on behalf of the UT Arlington Student Congress is the President of Student Congress. Any person, whether they are a member of the UT Arlington community or not, can author a resolution, but only a Student Congress Senator may sponsor and introduce it. If a resolution has a sponsor and has been introduced, Student Congress is obligated to research it.
This does not mean that all or even the majority of members in Student Congress agree with or support it. Furthermore, if the Student Congress passes a resolution, that resolution and all related research are then forwarded to various administrators and finally the University President. Student Congress acts as the voice of the student body, but the ultimate decision rests with the University President.
I would encourage everyone to read the resolution carefully and let the language speak for itself. The intent behind this resolution is not to put any student or staff member out of a job, infringe on the freedom of the press, create a controversy, or draw any negative attention to the University.
During the 2008 – 2009 academic year, I had the privilege and opportunity to serve on the Student Service Advisory Committee (SSAC), to which I was elected by the UT Arlington student body. This committee, composed of nine (some elected and some appointed) students, is charged with sitting in on budget presentations for various student service oriented departments (including Student Publications) and ultimately recommending to the University President how to appropriate the nearly six million dollars of student service funds.
After serving on this committee and learning about the sustainability initiatives at UT Arlington called “Mavericks Go Green,” I wrote resolutions 09-15, 09-19 and 09-20.
I would like to thank the Executive Board of Student Congress and the staff of Student Governance at UT Arlington for fielding all related questions about resolution 09-15. I know that it has been a busy couple of weeks and I sincerely appreciate all of your hard work. I commend and recognize these individuals who work tirelessly every day to better the University of Texas at Arlington to the best of their abilities.
At the end of the day, if all these resolutions accomplish is discussion of waste reduction at UT Arlington, I will consider them successful. There are many ways to “go green” and I hope you keep my humble suggestions in mind.
Thank you for your time and GO MAVS!
Sincerely,
Bess Alvarez
Proud Maverick Alumna and avid reader of The Shorthorn
Anonymous
5 months agoLink to this comment | Suggest removal
What do you think?