Jump to: site navigation, content.

Content from our friends over at Fortworthology

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Streetcars won’t change culture of Fort Worth


Rather, it’s giving Fort Worth the ability to meet the cultural change that’s already happening in the United States.

One of the more interesting bits to emerge from Tuesday’s streetcar update to the Fort Worth City Council was observing what happened to opponents Jungus Jordan and Zim Zimmerman after HDR’s thoroughly researched, meticulously planned presentation blew holes in their earlier complaints. HDR clearly and concisely showed that the proposed Phase One would have good ridership (even using extremely conservative estimates), could be paid for entirely with TIF & grant funds (no money from the general fund, no money from residents of other parts of the city), that the streetcar competed in no way with Tower 55 or with commuter rail, and would give back to the city at a conservative estimate of four-to-one compared to its cost. In fact, HDR’s Charles Hales said something quite bold during the presentation, so much so that I actually contacted him afterward and confirmed the quote:

"The Fort Worth streetcar, on a cost-to-benefit basis, is the strongest I’ve seen in the United States."

When the presentation was finished and the councilmembers gave input, Councilman Jordan reached for a few straws and came back with this, quoted nicely by the Fort Worth Weekly:

"This is a culturally changing atmosphere for this city, and I’m not sure we should change the culture of Fort Worth from what we are now to what we are with streetcars."

Which I’m not sure even makes sense.

Charles Hales himself refuted Jordan’s statement very effectively, pointing out that this isn’t a forced change of culture for Fort Worth – rather, it’s giving Fort Worth the ability to meet the cultural change that’s already happening in the United States. There is a very real shift in many demographics back to walkable urban neighborhoods – HDR’s presentation on Tuesday included several sourced-and-referenced studies showcasing this. The streetcar helps attract and shape that kind of growth.

In addition, Councilman Jordan has been clear in his support of the Tower 55 improvements project as well as the Southwest-to-Northeast commuter rail line. Given that the streetcar would become part of an integrated, holistic transit system along with things like SW2NE and the existing TRE, one could make the case that Jordan should be opposing those projects as well, if the “culture” of Fort Worth shouldn’t change.

That’s not even getting into the historical streetcar culture in Fort Worth. Our central city neighborhoods, the ones being revitalized right now and in need of an effective neighborhood circulator, were built on the backs of streetcars. And who doesn’t have fond memories of riding the Leonard Brothers’ subway into Downtown? In many ways historically and culturally, Fort Worth is a rail town – just one that’s lost its way for a while.

It’s this “culture” thing I keep coming back to. I’d like to ask Councilman Jordan just what the “culture” of Fort Worth is? I wasn’t aware there was a monolithic “Fort Worth culture” that everybody hews to. If parts of Fort Worth differ in their culture, are they not “real” Fort Worth by Jordan’s definition? Is the “real” Fort Worth “culture” only the one expressed in Councilman Jordan’s district? That comes across a bit insulting, don’t you think?

Here’s a newsflash for Jordan, Zimmerman, and Scarth: This “culture” change is already here in Fort Worth.

It’s the culture of the Near Southside. The culture of the West 7th Street residents. The culture of Downtown, the culture of Trinity Bluff, the culture of the Near Northside, the Near Southeast, and more. While they’re all at different stages of evolution, the central city neighborhoods of Fort Worth are attracting people of this cultural shift that Jordan is so scared of. The people who embrace urban neighborhoods, bicycles, mixed-use, street festivals, and more are the same people who will embrace the streetcar. It’s not forcing change on people who don’t want it – this change is already happening. We can either twiddle our thumbs and ignore it, or we can embrace it to great economic and livability benefit – which doesn’t involve forcing it on people in Jordan’s district.

I’d like to ask him how his vision of the “culture” of Fort Worth squares with images like these.

Fortworthology
Pegasus News Content partner - Fortworthology


Share: 
del.icio.us Digg DZone Facebook Fark Google Google Reader Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter YahooBuzz YahooMyWeb YCombinator


Sponsored Links

dgk, anonymous:

I am having real issues with statements made in above article including "One would have good ridership (even using extremely conservative estimates), could be paid for entirely with TIF & grant funds (no money from the general fund, no money from residents of other parts of the city)"

The writer is ill prepared or just plain unhinged making those kind of statements.

TIF's are partially funded at the county level ... so every citizen/taxpayer in Tarrant County would waste funds on the project

"Grants" are just a sexy name for waste of citizen/taxpayer funds ... believe it or not they do not come from the fairy godmother!

Dennis Killy Arlington ... home of Jerry's world famous "Silver Cockroach", "Penthouse King" Ryan, and world capital for government morons

1 year, 7 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

rawrunner2000, anonymous:

I agree with the previous comment.

"One would have good ridership (even using extremely conservative estimates), could be paid for entirely with TIF & grant funds (no money from the general fund, no money from residents of other parts of the city)"

The fare box will fall millions short of covering operations and maintenance.

Also agree with the earlier comment, TIFs do nothing more than strip the general fund of dollars to give to special interest buddies/projects. If there was no TIF, that would be general fund dollars. So it is costing general fund dollars by just having the TIF.

Why do you think Fort Worth had such a big deficit? They have so many special interest buddies/projects using TIFs to siphon money from the general fund, there was not enough for general fund expenditures.

1 year, 7 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

tywilliams01, anonymous:

I live in "Near Southside" and I am all for the streetcar project!! If it cost us a little then fine.....long term this is what needs to happen.

Fort Worth central area has already passed that of it's counterpart Dallas and adding the streetcar with bring more good folks to the central city.

I will see you all very soon on your new "Near Southside" Streetcar!!

1 year, 7 months ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

What do you think?

:

:

 Find out how to share this comment with Facebook

See more stories in:


Faved or commented on by...

Latest comments...

Pop icon Peter Max exhibits paintings at the Crescent Hotel this summer

unlisted, humbleness is a word according to a few dictionaries, but I agree that humility is better.


Peter Max

Haha, unlisted. It has been corrected.


Pop icon Peter Max exhibits paintings at the Crescent Hotel this summer

"humbleness"??????

Um, Mr. Means (reporter), your fourth-grade English teacher is going to smack yo


Stay connected