Similar
Stories
Content from our friends over at The Texas Tribune
Friday, July 29, 2011
Fees for Texas students redefine “free” public school
Keller ISD is now charging for busing.
As cash-strapped public schools attempt to squeeze every possible dollar out of their budgets, an unpleasant reality awaits parents: They will most likely have to pay for programs and services that schools once provided for free.
Consider Keller Independent School District just north of Fort Worth, where students who ride the bus will now pay $185 each per semester. Rather than scrap busing altogether after voters rejected a property tax hike in June to make up for lost state revenue, the district opted to institute fares.
The $4 billion cut in education financing at the state level for 2012-13 means these extra charges will become increasingly common. “We’re going to see districts charging fees for things that they have always been able to but just haven’t chosen to in the past,” said David Thompson, a former general counsel for the Texas Education Agency who now represents school districts.
Across the country, such fees also threaten to draw lawsuits — like the one affiliates of the American Civil Liberties Union in California filed in September against what it called the state’s “pay to learn” public schools — about what it means to provide a “free” public education under state constitutions.
Texas law gives districts broad authority in deciding what fees to charge students. There is one firm boundary: If it is an expense related to an activity or item required for a course grade, like textbooks, districts cannot charge for it. Basics like pens, erasers and notebooks do not count, and any charges related to activities or services where participation is voluntary — extracurricular activities, class trips and, yes, transportation — are fair game. The district must also have a process to waive or reduce fees for students who cannot afford them. Keller ISD, for example, will charge $100 each for students who qualify for free and reduced lunches.
Michael Griffith, a school finance expert with the Education Commission on the States, said that while fees for extracurricular activities had been on the rise since before the economic downturn, more schools are now exploring ways to pass on basic costs to parents.
“We see a lot of evidence now that there are districts and schools pushing the line,” Mr. Griffith said. That can often happen in letters home, he said, with teachers implying to parents that certain supplies are required and that students can’t show up without them.
Charging fees can also hurt poor students, especially those whose families just miss qualifying for a waiver, said Caroline Holcombe, a research analyst at Children at Risk, a Houston-based advocacy group.
“It’s likely money families just don’t have,” she said. “And if they are choosing between the next meal they are going to put on the table, whether they are going to buy fresh fruit and vegetables, and whether they are going to allow their kids to spend time after school at an activity, that’s a tough decision.”

Pegasus News Content partner - The Texas Tribune
Nearby stories
- Four cities break ground on joint-use jail and animal shelter facility in Keller
- Restaurant review: Tiny Cake Shop Cupcakes will have you begging to turn the car around for more
- Restaurant review: Keller's Sugar & Frosting cupcakes hit and miss in equal measure
- Sugar & Frosting is a new bakery in Keller
- UPDATED: Glenn Beck rents $4 million home in Westlake
Faved or commented on by...
Latest Contests
Latest comments...
Local chef, reality TV celeb Rachel Brown found dead
The previous comment has been removed for violating this website's Terms of Use.
5-year-old from Richardson featured on So You Think You Can Dance Tuesday night
I loved it! They expressed so much through dancing! So, so powerful! Then i accidently erased the sh
razorphreak, anonymous:
If no one is willing to question when an ISD spends far more for sports than for education, when school board salaries go into the millions because somehow they are convinced that you have to pay to have the best, our priorities are completely out of whack. Anyone really think a superintendent is actually worth 500K+ a year, especially in school districts where few if any citizens make anywhere near that (by the way, how have those folks been working out)? Anyone really think high school football needs to be played in a stadium that can hold more than 5,000? Anyone really think schools themselves have to be pictures of architecture wonder? Does every school need indoor facilities for sports that rival the pros?
School districts are like every other typical government entity at this point - spending far too much and justifying it with "it's for the kids."
With grades and test scores in the dump, they are first lying to us and second taking full advantage that most tax payers are apathetic to what's really going on.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Jason Rice, verified:
It's always interesting to hear arguments against property taxes and school costs. The prevailing hue and cry is "It's no MY kids in school?"
Let me assure you that these same kids are the ones that will look at your life support system costs with the same nonchalant analytically distant eye. "It's not MY iron lung."
Saving money like crazy.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Jason Rice, verified:
... and I hail Razor's criticism of professional sports in public school disguise.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Clay213, anonymous:
I think people would be more willing to pay infinite amounts of property taxes if they were not being soaked to pay for what basically amounts to free day care for little criminals that should be sent to labor camps not public schools.
DISD = Billion dollar a year failure
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
What do you think?