Similar
Stories
Monday, March 14, 2011
Third Chefs For Farmers event at Highland Park Cafeteria is a success of sorts
If success is the freedom to throw food away, then this was quite the hit.
DALLAS Sunday was the third "Chefs For Farmers" dinner, an event organized by chef Matt McCallister and his event-planning partner Iris McCallister to raise money for a charity and emphasize the use of locally-raised goods.
Like the first at Eden's Organics farm in Balch Springs, and the second at Times Ten Cellar in Fort Worth, this took place at an unconventional venue: Highland Park Cafeteria at Casa Linda Plaza. It sold out quickly, and drew nearly 250 people who filed through the restaurant's cafeteria line where chefs from more than a dozen restaurants, including Charlie Palmer, The Second Floor, The Grape, and Maple & Motor, served cheffy-chef versions of cafeteria food.
McCallister did a broccoli cheddar soup, John Tesar did mac & cheese and fried chicken, Restaurant Ava did wild boar sloppy Joes, Smoke did a clever Salisbury steak with gravy, Parigi did Tater Tots with pork belly, The Grape did cabbage rolls, and so on. CraveDFW founder Steve Doyle was emcee, and they had "celebrity judges" such as restaurateur Gene Street. Wine was poured by sommelier D'Lynn Proctor; the glasses were a motley collection purchased at thrift stores.
Diners were called up in groups of 50. The food looked good and people seemed to like it.
I didn't eat. I was too stunned by the rampant waste. Given the nature of the crowd -- one that seemed heavy on foodies -- I was flabbergasted to see how much food got thrown away, and how little respect it seemed to show for the work the chefs did, and the very nature of the event itself, with its emphasis on farmers and reverence for food.
With few exceptions, people stuffed their trays with two, three plates of food they knew they would not finish. They nibbled on their entrees, then pushed them aside so that they could get two, three desserts, which they then failed to finish. I didn't see a single plate "licked clean."
I know some people took their leftovers to go. (In styrofoam containers, so farm-friendly.) I get that the very nature of cafeterias encourages people to take more than they can eat, and that most attendees paid their $85 plus fees and therefore felt entitled to "get their money's worth." But should getting your money's worth include the freedom to throw food away?
Surveying the parade of over-stuffed trays that exited the cafeteria line, Nanci and Terri Taylor, who publish Edible Dallas Fort Worth, chatted with Parigi chef/owner Janice Provost about portion control.
"One Tater Tot, we're only giving out one Tater Tot!" Provost said, half-joking.
Outside of the restaurant, Highland Park Cafeteria owner Jeff Snoyer stood at the door, apologetically informing his Sunday night regulars that the restaurant was closed because there was a special event inside.
"I think there's something that happens when people are confronted with abundance," he said. "But this is a good event, what they're doing is wonderful."
Nearby stories
- Photos: Happy-go-lucky crowd danced polka to Brave Combo tunes at Arboretum
- Australian Shepherd lost in Casa View Haven neighborhood in Dallas
- Travel Channel names the Dallas Arboretum one of America's top 12 botanical gardens
- Photos: Practically skip a stone on White Rock Lake from this mid-century modern's in-home spa
- Goat for the gold: Local 5K raises money for the Sudan with a humorous twist
Faved or commented on by...
Related events
Latest Contests
Latest comments...
The Flaming Lips' Wayne Coyne gives a nearly naked performance on Jimmy Fallon
He's a sexy, sexy man even at his age... YUUMMMMMYYYEE!!!!!!
Plano will reconfigure unpopular median left turn at Preston and Legacy
Fascinating stats in docs from the police chief year before last...
Realtors resort to excavating tax records to ferret out potential clients
Nah. That fad is all but gone. Thay use them thar smart phones for stuff like that nowadays, I betch
Nancy Nichols, verified:
Post of the year.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
beda50, anonymous:
I read a comment last year, made by a woman from India, who, paraphrasing, said the third world could eat well on what Americans throw away. I agree, it's shameful.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Sander Wolf, verified:
More smaller portions would have been welcome (there were already a lot -- half sandwiches of the sloppy joe, the small cup of "liver and onions," small squares of ice cream sandwich, the sorbets served one mini-scoop at a time, etc.). But when you have this many chefs participating in one event there's just going to be some extra food (and alcohol, but that's another story...).
The balance here is tricky -- more chefs creates more awareness, but also more food. To not partake at all because others seemed wasteful to me is missing the forest for the trees.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Teresa Gubbins, staff:
beda50, this was my point exactly. i'm not at all blaming the event's organizers, they did a great job on a fun, unique event. i just expected more from the crowd, i guess
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Scott, anonymous:
Restaurant Week meets Golden Corral?
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
sarah7489, anonymous:
I don't think the plates were full because people wanted to get their money's worth, I believe they were full because people wanted to try everything. That was certainly the case at my table of 6. At an event like this, with such great food & talented chefs, you never know what your favorite dish might be. Some of us finished all of the brisket while some of us finished all of the sloppy joes. All of us felt guilty about the amount of food that remained on our plates. I didn't see the to-go containers, or I would have used one. I too, would have preferred smaller portions, but that wasn't an option, and we shared the larger portions when possible. To blanket the crowd as greedy, wasteful cheapskates seems a bit unfair.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
OEsophagus, anonymous:
NOT trying every dish is an option. People don't have to eat everything they see. Restraint is greater than gluttony.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
im8603, anonymous:
Thanks for the article. This is something we need to take a look at. We will talk about this at next recap meeting. Iris
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
rdziol, anonymous:
Teresa, I think you are being too hard on the crowd. I wanted to try as much as I could out of respect for the chefs who were serving me. How can I say no to John Tesar and say yes to Matt McCallister when both of their dishes looked just as good? Could I eat it all, no, of course not. But I did try it all and I can tell you that I ate every bit of the dishes I liked the best (burnt ends from Pecan Lodge, cabbage rolls from the Grape, the wild boar sloppy joes from Restaurant AVA, salisbury steak from Smoke and Meatloaf from ZaZa). Was I sad at the amount of food thrown away, of course, but I don't think that was the crowd's fault but the nature of walking the line. You missed out on some great food.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
kindofabigdeal, anonymous:
Certainly waste is bad, but what is the genesis of the waste? If those diners had taken less food would it have ended up any less wasted by the end of the night? was there a plan to do something with the excess? Are their hips a better storage place for the extras than the trash can?
It is a tiny economy. First, the food is prepared. At this point it is a commodity with a time limit. It's obviously in excess of the needs to the people consuming it, so whether its thrown away, eaten beyond Caloric need (I'm assuming the participants didn't fast the next two days to become Calorie neutral), or left on the steaming tray, it is wasted food. That is, it is food that served no essential purpose. The only solutions are to either reroute the excess to those who can use it or to prepare less food in the first place.
With the exception of packing up take-out boxes* for future hunger, what were the participants supposed to do that would make the food less wasted?
*a good solution, though its hard to tell from your article how prominent or promoted this practice was, and whether you thought it was a good solution to the problem of waste overall.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
stoic, anonymous:
OEsophagus: idiot comment of the year. You've out-twitwillowed twitwillow.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
babydoctx, anonymous:
I didn't finish my plate because some of the offerings were just plain bad.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
flamenca1, anonymous:
PUH-LEEZE! I think the reviewer needs to not make everything so ridiculously p.c. already.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Flux3, anonymous:
It would have been worse if they were serving Highland Park Cafeteria food. What a shame that they have the original recipes but no one running the place that understands food.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
What do you think?