Similar
Stories
Content from our friends over at The Texas Tribune
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Dallas-based Komen for the Cure drops support of Planned Parenthood
Supposedly the result of a new policy that bans grants to groups under federal investigation.
Eric Schlegel
Planned Parenthood clinical assistant Nicki Bailey discusses the new abortion laws with a patient in Austin.
The Dallas-based breast cancer prevention group Susan G. Komen for the Cure has halted its financial support of Planned Parenthood, yet another blow to the family planning organization that provides abortions in some of its clinics.
Planned Parenthood alleges that Komen — which was founded in 1982 by Nancy Goodman Brinker, a former U.S. ambassador to Hungary under George W. Bush, to honor her deceased sister — succumbed to rising political pressure.
"Our greatest desire is for Komen to reconsider this policy and recommit to the partnership on which so many women count," Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement posted on the organization's website.
No one could be reached for comment at Komen for the Cure. A Komen spokesperson told The Associated Press that the funding cutoff, which will halt the flow of hundreds of thousands of dollars earmarked for breast exams, is the result of a new policy that bans grants to groups under federal investigation. U.S. Rep. Cliff Stearns, a Florida Republican, has launched an inquiry into whether Planned Parenthood has spent taxpayer money on abortions, something that federal law prohibits. Planned Parenthood has vehemently denied this, calling the investigation politically motivated.

Pegasus News Content partner - The Texas Tribune
Related stories
- Rockwall parents upset about fundraiser to help controversial Komen for the Cure
- Planned Parenthood expands screening in Dallas, Fort Worth, Tyler, Waco, Austin
- All roads lead to Texas in Komen/Planned Parenthood drama
- Komen will continue funding Planned Parenthood
- UPDATED with video: Texas Planned Parenthood clinics brace for Komen cuts
Faved or commented on by...
Related events
Latest Contests
Latest comments...
S&D Oyster in Uptown Dallas is remodeling
my first job was to was dishes, and change the grease trap, but ole herb.....he made it to where I w
Creepy rendering of Big Tex shows he's almost ready for the State Fair
gosh some honest feed back finally, I thought I was in Detroit, with such appathy these past few mon
Album review: Cas Haley runs with rhythm and soul on La Si Dah
And as we all know, Germans love David Hasselhof.
Teresa Gubbins, staff:
A "De-fund The Komen Foundation" Facebook page has been established:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/De-fun...
Also, The Atlantic does a piece on Komen's decision that explores the role of Karen Handel, who has been Komen's senior VP for public policy since April 2011. Before that, she ran for governor of Georgia in 2010 and lost. During her gubernatorial campaign, she vowed to eliminate funding for breast and cervical cancer screenings provided by Planned Parenthood.
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/arc...
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Jason Rice, verified:
These are the same folks that litigiously own the phrase "... for the cure" and generally the entire word "cure"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12...
Methinks the tail officially has control and wagging directives over the dog.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
EdWood, anonymous:
There's an interesting OP-ED on SomethingAwful.com (of all places) http://www.somethingawful.com/d/featu...
One blurb that caught my attention was "The percentage of revenue Komen sinks into cancer research - remember this is by design "For the Cure" - has declined for the past decade, from 26% annually to 19%. Breast cancer mortality has not declined in decades. Administrative expenses are on the rise and remain murky at Komen."
I've done some research into Komen in the past. You can download their tax filings from their website. Pay CLOSE attention to the amount of money used for "Salaries, bonuses and other compensation" as well as "Number of full time employed". I think you'll see the true nature of this organization
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Jason Rice, verified:
Yup Ed - you nailed it. It's a money makin' machine and that has taken the reigns.
So for every $1 I am extorted at the grocery store checkout... One Dime, One Nickel, and Four Pennies are all I'm really giving.
I'm in a Facebook thread right now where we are joking about a "Race for the Real Cure" TM
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
damn yankee, anonymous:
All charities and things of that nature spend most of their money on administrative tasks. It's a sad but true fact.
But some are better about it than others; plenty of "non-profits" are self-perpetuating entities who care more about their paycheck than they do about the cause.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Collin Gouldin, verified:
Do you have sources to back that claim up. According to Charity Navigator only about %12 of Susan G Komen's expenses are administrative.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Teresa Gubbins, staff:
Karen Handel retweeted a controversial tweet that she later deleted but you can see it here:
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/...
Also, Komen's top public health official, Mollie Williams, resigned in protest immediately following the Komen board's decision to cut off Planned Parenthood.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
EdWood, anonymous:
Well, looking at the 2011 Form 990 filing (required of tax-exempt orgs I believe), you'll see it list 280 as the "Total number of individuals employed in the calendar year 2010" (line 5) and then a little further down, it lists the "Salaries, other compensation, employee benefits (like 15) as $24,232,513
Now, I'm no math wizard but to me that looks like the average employee's compensation was $865,446.87 ?
I'm glad they're so "charitable"
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
damn yankee, anonymous:
I imagine that part of that compensation is health insurance costs, which are probably pretty steep; there's probably travel budget in there as well.
So yes, they spend a lot on their employees, but let's also not go thinking that each of them brings home seventy grand a month in cash money.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
What do you think?