Similar
Stories
Content from our friends over at Star Local News
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Injunction filed against Garland gun range by Rowlett
There are have been three incidents of bullets hitting nearby homes in the past two years.
A gun range in the city of Garland is in the crosshairs of the city of Rowlett after three incidents involving bullets endangering the lives of its residents have occurred within the last two years.
“We have filed for a petition for injunction against the gun range,” said Lynda Humble, city manager. “We filed the petition on Thursday and the gun range owner, James Day, was served at his home on Friday. We have moved very quickly and aggressively to make it happen.”
Rowlett police were called to two homes on Jan. 16 after homeowners complained their homes were hit by bullets. The first complaint was called in at approximately 7:03 p.m. for a residence in the 3000 block of Duchess Way and the second at 7:32 p.m. for a residence in the 3200 block of Fair Oaks Drive.
According to Lt. David Nabors, head of the criminal investigations division for the Rowlett Police Department, the bullets recovered were from a high-powered rifle. He said that the bullets recovered could have easily traveled the distance from the gun range to the homes they struck.
“They still had enough velocity to penetrate several walls within the residence,” Nabors said.
The two incidents last week are the second and third within the last two years. In June 2010, Rowlett resident Michael Domin was injured when a bullet struck him while he was working in his backyard. At the time of that incident, two additional bullets were recovered from his residence. Domin told emergency personnel that it felt like he had been shot. He stated that at the time of the incident he was alone in his yard and had not had any altercation with anyone. When medical personnel arrived at the scene they found that Domin had a gunshot wound to the back. He was transported by ambulance to Medical Center of Plano where he underwent immediate surgery.
“Essentially the way the city is viewing this is that when Michael Domin was injured it was an isolated incident. All of the information from the investigation came back inconclusive,” Humble said. “In the most recent incidents we had bullets entering homes. Our residents ought to feel safe in their homes. They should not have to worry about being struck by a bullet while they are sitting in their easy-chair watching television.”
The city is taking action to prevent any future incidents from occurring. It has filed an injunction on behalf of Janine and David Bowman, whose home was struck last week, seeking to have the Garland Public Shooting Range shutdown until it can determine the cause of the stray bullets and proper corrective action can be taken to avoid future issues.
The city believes there is enough evidence to suggest the bullets came from the gun range.
“In all likelihood they are coming from the gun range,” Humble said. “Our number one concern here is public safety. Our residents deserve to feel safe in their homes. That cannot happen when we have bullets entering exterior walls. We filed the injunction in hopes that the judge will require Mr. Day to operate a safe gun range that does not endanger Rowlett residents. This is not an effort to put him out of business; it’s truly a public safety issue.”
A hearing on the injunction is scheduled in the 95th District Court in Dallas on Feb. 7.
“We would hope to have the entire neighborhood present at the hearing to show the judge the seriousness of their concerns,” Humble said.
The city is also trying to get the help of the state to ensure public safety as well. Humble said that the Rowlett Mayor Todd Gottel has been in contact with the attorney general’s office and plans to meet with them about picking up the legal suit against the gun range on behalf of the residents of Rowlett.
“Mayor Gottel contacted our legislative delegation to get us a meeting with the attorney general in hopes they will pick this suit up,” Humble said.”If the attorney general picks up the case then that will carry some significant weight and show the seriousness of the situation.”
The city itself cannot be named in the suit because of Senate Bill No. 766 that was passed during the last legislative session. It prohibits cities from suing gun ranges but allows for private individuals whose property lies within the affected area or the attorney general to file a lawsuit against them.
“We have asked some residents in the neighborhood if they wanted to be involved in the suit against the gun range and the Bowmans agreed to be named as the plaintiffs,” Humble said. “Their home was one of the ones struck by bullets last week. One landed in their child’s bedroom so you can only imagine what might have happened had their child been in there.”
Rowlett police are still investigating the incidents to determine the definite origin of the bullets and how the incidents occurred. Anyone with information in these incidents is asked to contact the Rowlett Police Department criminal investigations division at 972-412-6215.

Pegasus News Content partner - Star Local News
Related stories
Nearby stories
Faved or commented on by...
Latest Contests
Latest comments...
Boots on the ground: Your guide to tornado disaster relief benefits in DFW
Here's a last-minute one for Wednesday night: Enticed, a shaved ice food truck, will be donating 100
UPDATED: Craft brewing overhaul gets final approval
Sorry, but I don't suffer fools gladly. Have a nice day.
Dallas-based Pecan Lodge is Texas Monthly's second-best barbecue joint, sort of
It's good and the hoi-paloi likes it, so the stiffs who insist on "redecorating" Dallas to suit thei
transspec, anonymous:
The Garland range has been in operation for over 40 years. Why, all of a sudden, have bullets been falling from the skys into a neighborhood over a mile and a quarter away? Sounds awfully fishy to me. Could it be a bunch of folks that don't like guns trying to cause trouble for the range?
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
nuofyourbiz, anonymous:
Why would anyone buy a home located so close to an outdoor gun range?
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
mrduckssar, anonymous:
Does seem fishy that "all of a sudden" there is a problem...That being said, anyone shooting a gun is responsible for the bullets. That makes the shooter the issue and not the gun range.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
firehazard9, anonymous:
If you think there are no stray bullets coming from that gun range get your fishing pole and head down stream of pleasant valley on rowlett creek spend 10 minutes there on Saturday afternoon and then say this is all made up. Do you have bullets flying in your Windows I dont.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
damn yankee, anonymous:
> Why would anyone buy a home located so close to an outdoor gun range?
yeah, it's those idiot home-owners' fault! Thank god someone is here to knock some sense into those of us who don't want bullets falling on our heads for some reason.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Clay213, anonymous:
The round in the 2010 incident was a .22
That is about as far away from 'high powered' as you can get without getting into BB territory.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Odenihy, anonymous:
If you don't want bullets falling on your head, it might be a good idea not I buy a house down range from an outdoor shooting range. The range was there before the neighborhood. There are all sorts of things I wouldn't want to live in close proximity to, so I won't buy a house near them. I won't buy a house near something dangerous, then try to get it shut down. I especially would not put my children in danger by moving down range from an outdoor gun range.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Clay213, anonymous:
The fact people seem to be missing is that there is no proof or even evidence the rounds are coming from the range. It's all just speculation.
The physics would imply otherwise
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
BrimstoneBroker, anonymous:
"The Garland range has been in operation for over 40 years. Why, all of a sudden..."
Couple of possibilities or both, perhaps... (1) They're a bunch of liars. None of the examples shown on TV came from that range. Some didn't even look like damage from any type of gunfire. (2) Texas has been inundated with a bunch of lousy, stinking outsiders. {What used to be called Yankees.} Most of them are wimpy pyssants that have no respect for other people's culture and values. Part of the Texas Culture is firearms, target practice, and hunting. Respect it, or get the Hell out of Texas. You will not like it here, because your crappy way of thinking will always lose out.
So, take your lousy lies and I-30, go home, or sit down and shut up.
I would like to have put it less bluntly, but that never works.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
damn yankee, anonymous:
> {What used to be called Yankees.}
Hey! We prefer the term Canadian Americans!
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
Jason Rice, verified:
We still call 'em Yankees.
"Canadian Americans" ticks off both sides of the canal up there.
Link to this comment | Suggest removal
What do you think?