Jump to: site navigation, content.

Content from our friends over at Town Square Buzz

Friday, January 11, 2013

Opinion: Let’s put a Glock in every lunchbox


Is McKinney well on its way to becoming the first police state community in the U.S.?

Moms, when packing your kids lunch tomorrow: sandwich, juice, banana and, oh yes, don’t forget their favorite Glock or AR-15, whichever they prefer.

If we want to keep our children safe, we must arm each grade school, middle school and, yes, every teenage student and their raging hormones, with a weapon of mass carnage.

Sounds outrageous?

I’m only taking the National Rifle Association’s absurd position on gun control to its logical conclusion. The NRA’s answer to gun violence is more guns.

I was not going to get into the gun control debate just yet, then I saw TSB’s story on MISD stationing swat teams (OK, OK, one officer) at each middle school.

Really? So this is what we have come to? What happened to actually educating our children? Now before you accuse me of being some left-wing, liberal nut job that’s against guns, let me be very clear. I fully support our 2nd Amendment and I believe it is our constitutional right to keep and bear arms if that is our choice as sane adults.

In addition, I come from a military family, thus we owned guns and I owned a gun awhile back. We can all agree that what happened in Newtown, Conn., was an absolute tragedy in every sense of that word. However, in our national gun debate, is the answer to our dilemma to put more guns on the street? Is this the society in which we want to live?

The NRA’s Wayne LaPierre said that to stop a bad guy with a gun, we need a “good guy with a gun.” And exactly who is this good guy? The majority of the killers in the worst mass gun violence incidents are described as "good guys" by their family and friends.

A liberal would say: What if the bad guy couldn’t get his hands on a gun in the first place?

But, is this a liberal or conservative issue, or rather an American problem?

Bringing the debate closer to home, I usually tell my under-studies that in a crisis situation, one should never knee-jerk, i.e., react impulsively. Instead, let the situation play out and get all the facts right before making a decision.

So why is the MISD knee-jerking on gun violence?

Parents who send their kids to MISD schools should be asking many questions as to why MISD jumped the gun on this issue:

  • Was there a viable threat(s) that local police and MISD did not disclose?
  • Were parents/tax payers consulted at all?
  • Who made this unilateral decision? The Mayor? School board? The NRA?
  • Was this in reaction to what happened in Newtown? Why now?
  • Who are these SROs and how were they selected? Trained? Background checks? Psychological testing?
  • What will they be looking for?

Now I am aware that last year there was a threat against a local McKinney school. There must have been a lot of "what ifs" by McKinney citizens. While there are missing details and the facts on this incident are sketchy -- I believe there was no real threat to local schools, just a lot of bravado and talk by a disturbed student. Does this warrant a declaration of martial law at all McKinney middle schools?

Because of this and other horrible incidents such as Aurora, Newtown, etc., I would like to see more involvement and concern from parents, citizens, and tax payers. They should be demanding more answers from the MISD and MPD?

But why stop there? In addition to SROs in every middle school, let’s explore some of these ideas:

  • Let’s arm every parent, teacher, and student
  • How about adding a Guns Are Your Friend course in MISD cirriculums
  • School field trips will now go to Gun Shows and firing ranges
  • Every student will take the NRA oath and be an NRA card member in good standing
  • Before graduation from the MISD system, students must be able to deliver a clean killing shot

While these ideas seem ridiculous on the surface, to the NRA mindset would they be out of the realm of possibility?

Now let me say that I am as certain as can be that both the MPD and MISD mean well and have the best intentions for the safety of our children -- they have remained diligent and have done a great job to protect the littlest of McKinney's citizens. I just believe such a move in its middle schools was not necessary. They created a solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.

The City McKinney's motto is "Unique by Nature." May I suggest that the McKinney Police Department and your MISD are well on their way to making McKinney unique as the first police state community in these United States?

Town Square Buzz
Pegasus News Content partner - Town Square Buzz

Eli is a columnist for TownSquareBuzz.com, a marketer, and published author. The views expressed in his column -- like them or not -- are strictly his. Feel free to contact Eli at TheEliHernandez@gmail.com.



Share: 
del.icio.us Digg DZone Facebook Fark Google Google Reader Reddit Slashdot StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter YahooBuzz YahooMyWeb YCombinator


lindy_olsen, anonymous:

Is this supposed to be a satire? You're aware what "SRO" stands for, correct? A "Student Resource Officer" is a, you know, police officer. I myself, as a teacher in MISD and a self-professed "left-wing liberal", am not concerned about the addition of one cop per middle school campus.

Upon further reflection, I am drawing the conclusion that this must be satire and I am being trolled. Well done?

4 months, 1 week ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

wingtipwalker, anonymous:

Calling something an "opinion" piece, to me, implies there should be some rational thought and journalistic value....this is just...silly.

4 months, 1 week ago
Link to this comment | Suggest removal

ann1968, anonymous:

But why stop there? In addition to SROs in every middle school, let’s explore some of these ideas:

Let’s arm every parent, and teacher who is legally able and willing to be armed. 
How about adding a Firearms Safety & Hunting certification course in MISD curriculums?
School field trips will now go to Gun Shows and firing ranges.
Every student will take the NRA oath and be an NRA card member in good standing.
Before graduation from the MISD system, students must be able to pass the US Army marksmanship course (or Appleseed).

Sounds like a good plan to me.

selfaaron, anonymous:

The 2nd amendment is in danger. This idiot writer is making me rethink the 1st amendment as well.

Jason Rice, verified:

I think we need two spaceships on either end of the metroplex.
We run two ads, one stating that all gun control fans and supporters of confiscation of all weapons will meet at spaceship #1. Then a second ad runs that states everybody wanting to secure their guns forever will meet at spaceship #2.

Launch both at 9:00 a.m. heading for a Exoplanet and the rest of us can celebrate with a nice brunch.

damn yankee, anonymous:

Why bother sending them all the way to an exoplanet, when you can just aim them towards each other in the lower atmosphere, and enjoy a nice fireworks show with your brunch?

I bet all the gunpowder would make it extra pretty.

What do you think?

:

:

 Find out how to share this comment with Facebook

See more stories in:


Faved or commented on by...

Latest comments...

Realtors resort to excavating tax records to ferret out potential clients

Nah. That fad is all but gone. Thay use them thar smart phones for stuff like that nowadays, I betch


Plano will reconfigure unpopular median left turn at Preston and Legacy

"Motorists should steer clear of the intersection for the first 30 days after the reversal, Cosgrove


Stay connected