Jump to: site navigation, content.

rickfred8988

Joined Nov. 5, 2012

0
reviews
3
comments
0
favorites

Comments

  • 6 months, 2 weeks ago
    rickfred8988's comment on:

    Mormon Church establishes new stake in Heath

    swztnpwag-FARMS is not considered objective research. What are your other sources-FAIR and SHEILDS? That is like me sending you to talk to Sandra Tanner-while she is correct, you would not consider her a reasonable source of information. You can call me names all you want-but there are plenty of places to find out the truth of what I have said. As long as you are only getting your information from places like FARMS and SHIELDS you will continue to be misinformed. Have a nice day.


  • 6 months, 2 weeks ago
    rickfred8988's comment on:

    Mormon Church establishes new stake in Heath

    Unfortunately the Book of Mormon doesn't hold up to any scrutiny. Any objective examination shows that it is a 19th century creation. That is why there is a mass exodus of people leaving Mormonism. A Mormon leader even spoke on that topic at Utah State. Have a great day.
  • 6 months, 2 weeks ago
    rickfred8988's comment on:

    Mormon Church establishes new stake in Heath

    The unfortunate part that you fail to mention in this article is that the "history" in the Book of Mormon never happened. Unlike the Bible where one can actually visit historic sights, the Book of Mormon can not produce a single one. Any Mormon that wants to dispute that can look at his/her own church and see that they can't even agree where the Hill of Cumorah is (New York or Central America). I would love to see a Mormon map-but you can't have one when there is no actual location for the events. There is not a single piece of historical, archeological, anthropological, linguistic, or genetic evidence to support any event in the Book of Mormon. Unlike the Bible, that while having a few holes, is being constantly and increasingly supported every year.